ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 May 2012, 12:24 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
Ultimate Response to “Why did you spend so much $$$ on Rolex?” Thread
Clearly, we all love Rolex, and we also know that a lot of people think we’re crazy for spending thousands on a watch. I’ve seen several threads about how to respond when someone asks us why we bought Rolex, and the answers are typically pretty general: the history, workmanship, quality, design, durability, etc. I thought it may be nice to have a thread where we go into more detail so our members can have an intelligent response to the loaded question many of us are bound to hear.
I’m going to make a list of traits on why I think it’s worth it to own Rolex and then try to go into a little detail. Movement: Rolex doesn't use a battery to operate. It uses over 150 moving parts, and when serviced on a regular schedule it keep time well after you're dead and buried. Every aspect of the construction of a Rolex is done in-house to ensure precision quality. Materials: Rolex uses 9904L steel, which is highly corrosion resistant and virtually scratch proof. The gold in Rolex is solid 18k gold. Resale Value: Some Rolex models you could buy used, wear for a couple of years, and sell it later for a profit. Not many items hold their value like a Rolex Durability: The Rolex hairspring is not affected by magnetic fields and is 10x more resistant to shocks than the average automatic watch.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
16 May 2012, 12:38 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
I've loved the Rolex brand since I was a child and spotted my first Submariner in an AD window. When I finally bought my fist one (5513) in the late 70's I new nothing of all the fine traits you've listed.
Now as a more educated WIS these traits are all great bonuses, but I'd still own a Rolex without them. |
16 May 2012, 12:40 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: David
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Deep Sea 116660
Posts: 495
|
How about the over-engineering? Despite the fact that I'll never dive 2 miles, I find value in the fact that my watch is designed to take the pressure of a 2 mile submersion.
|
16 May 2012, 12:46 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
|
Because I can....
I can wear them everyday... I can use them in sports or dressier situations... I can get them wet.. and if I feel like it.. I can sell it at almost no loss after years of use..
__________________
Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers.. |
16 May 2012, 12:48 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
16 May 2012, 01:17 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Leo
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: 16610LV 116610LV
Posts: 989
|
|
16 May 2012, 12:48 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
|
Rolex is just the gateway into real masterpieces like Patek, Vacheron, and Audemars... If someone has to ask you that question then they have no idea what our hobby is all about...
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung |
16 May 2012, 01:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Sam is right about me. I've spent the 7-10k on each Rolex before because I wouldn't spend the $30k+ to play with the big boys. Still a few more weeks of waiting until I'm really called an idiot for my AP. IMO buying watches is no different than being a member at an exclusive CC, taking tons of vacations, buying cars, hunting trips, etc.
|
16 May 2012, 01:09 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Nate
Location: Pottsville, PA
Watch: Sub-c LV, GMT's
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2012, 02:47 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
16 May 2012, 03:07 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Adam
Location: Chicago
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 265
|
I started looking at Patek. Where does the addiction end? I like Rolex but think there is a Patek in my future.
|
16 May 2012, 12:49 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
|
16 May 2012, 12:48 AM | #13 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
|
16 May 2012, 02:02 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
This is the opposite of what I was looking for
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
16 May 2012, 01:05 PM | #15 | |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Quote:
If you have to come up with justification for the way you spend your money, you should question your choice of people that surround you. So rather than trying to find justification on why you spent that money on a Rolex, think about your rebuttal to someone that responds to your bullet pointed list with these simple facts: There are more accurate watches that cost less. There are automatic watches with equally reliable movements that cost less There are watches that have as much heritage that cost less "Because I can" certainly starts to look like the most appropriate answer after you realize that those great things that make Rolex a Rolex don't mean anything to a non-wis |
|
16 May 2012, 03:49 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
|
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds |
16 May 2012, 12:56 AM | #17 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
904L is definitely not scratch proof but is more corrosion resistant than the more commonly used 316L because of a higher nickel content. 316L is harder and more scratch resistant than 904L.
If given the choice, I would have preferred my Rolex be made of 316L |
16 May 2012, 12:57 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
Heritage.
__________________
|
16 May 2012, 01:03 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
|
16 May 2012, 04:05 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Edward
Location: Detroit, MI
Watch: 16710
Posts: 92
|
X2
|
16 May 2012, 01:08 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Franken
Posts: 437
|
The few people that know I own it look at me like I have a duck on my head. Nobody I know owns one and I rarely see one in the wild around here.
The only responses I give that doesn't bring long discussions is "because I want to" and "because I can". |
16 May 2012, 09:47 AM | #22 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Linz
Location: Perth WA
Watch: My bank balance!
Posts: 1,373
|
Quote:
I only have one other friend that owns one (apart from the new friends I've made here on TRF and enjoy a bevvy with) I don't care what people think and I don't feel I need to justify it to anyone, it just makes me feel good wearing a Rolex...'nuff said
__________________
SS Submariner Date 16610 - SS Polar Explorer GMT 216570 |
|
16 May 2012, 01:09 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Answer to thread title: Mind your own business
|
16 May 2012, 02:54 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
__________________
It's been said that money can never buy happiness which is true, but I'd rather cry while seated in the back of a Rolls Royce limousine instead crying while seated on a bicycle. |
16 May 2012, 01:23 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
|
if someone ask me that I would say:
some people like to buy expensive cars that they only use a couple of hours a day... after years of use they sell them at a huge loss just to get a new one... on the other hand.. I wear an expensive watch.. I do not wear it only a couple of hours a day.. I wear it all day.. (and it is safe with me)... and it will probably hold it's value better than other luxury items... so it is a win win situation..
__________________
Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers.. |
16 May 2012, 11:39 AM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2012, 01:23 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
Because WINNING!
__________________
|
16 May 2012, 08:57 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: nope
Location: S of Mason-Dixon
Watch: NDSub/PAM176/R1931
Posts: 262
|
|
16 May 2012, 01:25 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Quote:
They still out source manufacture of mainsprings,but with a little care from its owner then yes they are good for 50 plus years. Materials: Rolex uses 9904L steel, which is highly corrosion resistant and virtually scratch proof. The gold in Rolex is solid 18k gold Fact 904L SS yes its slightly more corrosion resistant but, fact 904L will scratch easier than 316L, its not a harder or a more scratch resistant S.Steel. And 18ct gold is 18ct gold which is 750 parts pure gold the other various alloys like copper. Durability: The Rolex hairspring is not affected by magnetic fields and is 10x more resistant to shocks than the average automatic watch. This is what the marketing tell us ,but what Rolex does not state its 10 times more resistant to what.And in the real world would doubt if the average wearer would notice any real difference over the Nivarox ones they have used for the past 40 years. Resale Value: Some Rolex models you could buy used, wear for a couple of years, and sell it later for a profit. Not many items hold their value like a Rolex Agree Rolex watches have always held there price well in the market place.But today many see Rolex watches as little more than $$$£££ and many today just wear the brand.And not many care about the Rolex history today except perhaps the WIS type,in todays world Rolex its now to many just wearing a name on a dial.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
16 May 2012, 01:29 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
I met a man at a bowling tournament this weekend who was wearing a vintage Sea Dweller (circa 1975) that was in excellent shape, except for some scratches on the acrylic crystal.
I marveled at it and showed him new 14060M and told him about my Explorer and my DJ. He gave me an astonished look and asked my why I would ever buy another Rolex when one would last a lifetime. l just smiled and said that I cannot help myself. I have this disorder and that I'm a Watch Idiot Savant, otherwise known as a Watch Nut. I think that's explanation enough for most people who think a person is bonkers for owning even one. If they're up for conversation, you can talk about history, tradition, heritage, innovation, the benevolent foundation, the involvement in the improvement of the global community, materials, value, etc., but if you go on too long, they will either fall asleep or just walk away. The less said the better. If find that most people are annoyed by Rolex watches, so it's best to let sleeping dogs lie.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.