ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mitchie41 · 26 May 2012, 12:41 PM

Hey Everyone:

I'm in the market for an AP Royal Oak. Either 15300st or 15400st.

Unfortunately, the only AP dealer in town has sold out of 15300ST models so I have no way to see if the 39mm case will fit me.

Anyone know how the AP RO fits (larger, same, smaller) compared to any of the standard 40mm Rolex models (GMT II, Sub, Expl II) as I do have those watches to compare to.

Regards,
M

dddrees · 26 May 2012, 01:07 PM

A bit but not to much smaller then the the GMIIC.

p_mcgee · 26 May 2012, 01:24 PM

15300 is slightly smaller in diameter but way thinner & less bulky than a subc or gmt2c

Fiery · 26 May 2012, 06:45 PM

Due to their very long lugs Royal Oaks generally wear larger than their diameter. After the Sub-C, when I strap on my RO 15300ST I could swear it is a 42mm watch. However, as McGee stated, it's much thinner than a Sub-C, and also you have to get used to the look of the integrated bracelet.

As for 15300 vs 15400: if you have an average sized or bigger wrist, then I'd say you should go for the 15400. However, if you have a thin, sub-6.5" wrist like me (6.3 inches here), then 15300 will be a better fit. Here's how the 15300ST looks like on a 6.3 inch wrist:

And for comparison, here's how the same wrist wears a Sub-C:

MP5 · 26 May 2012, 07:04 PM

Wow, Im kinda shocked with how big the AP looks

Darlinboy · 26 May 2012, 09:33 PM

For me, the RO 15300ST wears larger than most 40mm watches because of the lug-to-lug dimensions. The white dial version gives it even more "visual" size, IMO.

texex91 · 26 May 2012, 10:11 PM

Own Sub-C's and tried on 15300 and found it too small.

NOW, that was just because I tend to like things just a bit larger.

15300 is obviously more dressy, so it may be the perfect watch to accompany your Sub.

Still waiting to try on 15400...

kilyung · 26 May 2012, 10:17 PM

On a 6.5" wrist...

Let me know if you need more comparison pics. Hmmm. I need better pics of the 116619.

roh123 · 26 May 2012, 11:15 PM

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

kilyung · 26 May 2012, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roh123

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

That's an excellent comparo!

dddrees · 26 May 2012, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roh123

Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

Great comparison.

kilyung · 26 May 2012, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Great comparison.

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

roh123 · 26 May 2012, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

I'm afraid it's been through worse. I use my watches.

dddrees · 27 May 2012, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Yeah but I cringe when I see the Rolex crown touching the RO case.

Agree.

B. Doggy · 27 May 2012, 01:14 AM

The 15300 wears larger than my 16610, hands down. I have 7.25" wrists and think the 15300 dimensions and fit are perfect. Personally don't think I would want to go for the 41mm model. Not in the RO anyway. Would love to get a ROO some day though.

TSW · 27 May 2012, 04:25 AM

One word....Perfect!!

wrxsti · 27 May 2012, 05:37 AM

excellet choice, that is a fantastic reference that i have had my eye on for some time, wow stunning pics Mike!

KlausM · 15 June 2012, 06:07 AM

AP RO 15300 and Rolex SD 1665.

BR
Klaus

TimeOnHand · 15 June 2012, 07:09 AM

My 15300 on 6.5" wrist. Fit really well.

kilyung · 15 June 2012, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeOnHand

My 15300 on 6.5" wrist. Fit really well.

Perfect is a better description.

ydna808 · 15 June 2012, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Perfect is a better description.

mitchie41 · 15 June 2012, 10:58 AM

Thanks for all the replies guys!

TSW · 15 June 2012, 09:18 AM

AP 15300 vs 26300

B. Doggy · 15 June 2012, 11:53 AM

So which one then?

mitchie41 · 15 June 2012, 12:05 PM

I'm thinking 15400st. I managed to find a ROC to try on and I found it on the small side.

I have large wrists and I think the 15400 will fit better. Just need to wait until my local AD has them in stock.

Thanks!
Mitch

texex91 · 15 June 2012, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mitchie41

I'm thinking 15400st. I managed to find a ROC to try on and I found it on the small side.

I have large wrists and I think the 15400 will fit better. Just need to wait until my local AD has them in stock.

Thanks!
Mitch

I agree with you in many ways.

Think the larger size will start appealing to many once they see it (and it starts to replace the smaller 15300).

For the loyal RO fans, they might turns toward the 15202 moving forward, as the 15300 will be replaced by 15400.

Let us know what you think of 15400 once you try it on.

kilyung · 15 June 2012, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

AP 15300 vs 26300

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

TSW · 16 June 2012, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

As much as i do love my Daytona..it hardly never get's any wrist time.

Submarino · 15 June 2012, 02:37 PM

My 15300 (second pic) on my 7.5" wrist and the 15400 while trying it on a week ago.

texex91 · 15 June 2012, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

Mike the ROC would be a PERFECT addition to the already stunning rotation. If there were one that I would replace the Daytona with it would be the ROC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

My 15300 (second pic) on my 7.5" wrist and the 15400 while trying it on a week ago.

Hal that 15400 looks perfect on your wrist IMHO. 15300 is sharp, but comparing the two, 15400 looks more fitted to your wrist. What were your impressions between the two

26 May 2012, 12:41 PM	#1
mitchie41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Vancouver Posts: 79	AP Royal Oak 15300 Fit Hey Everyone: I'm in the market for an AP Royal Oak. Either 15300st or 15400st. Unfortunately, the only AP dealer in town has sold out of 15300ST models so I have no way to see if the 39mm case will fit me. Anyone know how the AP RO fits (larger, same, smaller) compared to any of the standard 40mm Rolex models (GMT II, Sub, Expl II) as I do have those watches to compare to. Regards, M

26 May 2012, 01:07 PM	#2
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	A bit but not to much smaller then the the GMIIC. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

26 May 2012, 06:45 PM	#4
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	Due to their very long lugs Royal Oaks generally wear larger than their diameter. After the Sub-C, when I strap on my RO 15300ST I could swear it is a 42mm watch. However, as McGee stated, it's much thinner than a Sub-C, and also you have to get used to the look of the integrated bracelet. As for 15300 vs 15400: if you have an average sized or bigger wrist, then I'd say you should go for the 15400. However, if you have a thin, sub-6.5" wrist like me (6.3 inches here), then 15300 will be a better fit. Here's how the 15300ST looks like on a 6.3 inch wrist: And for comparison, here's how the same wrist wears a Sub-C: __________________ "In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)

26 May 2012, 09:33 PM	#6
Darlinboy 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: DB Location: :noitacoL Watch: :hctaW Posts: 6,703	For me, the RO 15300ST wears larger than most 40mm watches because of the lug-to-lug dimensions. The white dial version gives it even more "visual" size, IMO. __________________ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

27 May 2012, 01:14 AM	#15
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	The 15300 wears larger than my 16610, hands down. I have 7.25" wrists and think the 15300 dimensions and fit are perfect. Personally don't think I would want to go for the 41mm model. Not in the RO anyway. Would love to get a ROO some day though. __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

26 May 2012, 01:24 PM	#3
p_mcgee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,150	15300 is slightly smaller in diameter but way thinner & less bulky than a subc or gmt2c

26 May 2012, 07:04 PM	#5
MP5 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: ATX Posts: 2,886	Wow, Im kinda shocked with how big the AP looks

26 May 2012, 10:11 PM	#7
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	Own Sub-C's and tried on 15300 and found it too small. NOW, that was just because I tend to like things just a bit larger. 15300 is obviously more dressy, so it may be the perfect watch to accompany your Sub. Still waiting to try on 15400...

26 May 2012, 10:17 PM	#8
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	On a 6.5" wrist... Let me know if you need more comparison pics. Hmmm. I need better pics of the 116619.

26 May 2012, 11:15 PM	#9
roh123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: Per Location: Sweden Watch: Gilt Rolex Posts: 2,946	Only got vintage Rolexes but hope the pic can help somewhat. On a 7,3 inch wrist

27 May 2012, 04:25 AM	#16
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	One word....Perfect!! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

27 May 2012, 05:37 AM	#17
wrxsti "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth Posts: 1,695	excellet choice, that is a fantastic reference that i have had my eye on for some time, wow stunning pics Mike! __________________ PP Geneva

15 June 2012, 06:07 AM	#18
KlausM "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Copenhagen Watch: Rolex + Posts: 105	AP RO 15300 and Rolex SD 1665. BR Klaus

15 June 2012, 07:09 AM	#19
TimeOnHand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Hong Kong Watch: Rolex Air-King Posts: 4,468	My 15300 on 6.5" wrist. Fit really well. __________________ Instagram: timeonhand1010

15 June 2012, 10:58 AM	#22
mitchie41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Vancouver Posts: 79	Thanks Thanks for all the replies guys!

15 June 2012, 09:18 AM	#23
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	AP 15300 vs 26300 __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

15 June 2012, 11:53 AM	#24
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	So which one then? __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

15 June 2012, 12:05 PM	#25
mitchie41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Vancouver Posts: 79	Hey I'm thinking 15400st. I managed to find a ROC to try on and I found it on the small side. I have large wrists and I think the 15400 will fit better. Just need to wait until my local AD has them in stock. Thanks! Mitch

15 June 2012, 02:37 PM	#29
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	My 15300 (second pic) on my 7.5" wrist and the 15400 while trying it on a week ago. Attached Images __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)