ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mickey® · 1 August 2012, 01:21 PM

I think I argued in the past that the SubDate is THE Rolex Submariner.

I humbly stand corrected. LOOK AT THESE PAGES OF Submariners. NOT A ONE THAT IS with a DATE.

My apologies....

Pages and pages to scroll...One pic for good measure.

http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2007/0...ough-time.html

drockadam · 1 August 2012, 01:27 PM

Either a Submariner No Date, or Submariner Date, I like them both! Though I prefer a Submariner Date, because of that nice 2.5x pearly white datewheel! Or a 1680 with a over-magnified date! But then again, a heavily patina'ed dial with a Black/Grey NATO. I love them all! Those Submariners

Sponon · 1 August 2012, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickey®

I think I argued in the past that the SubDate is THE Rolex Submariner.

I humbly stand corrected.

You have been a member of this fine forum for almost a year, and just now you bothered to read the history of the Submariner?

Better late than never

Silvio Mosiello · 1 August 2012, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sponon

You have been a member of this fine forum for almost a year, and just now you bothered to read the history of the Submariner?

Better late than never

Mickey® · 1 August 2012, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sponon

You have been a member of this fine forum for almost a year, and just now you bothered to read the history of the Submariner?

Better late than never

I've been around Rolex longer than a year and...

You missed the point but....thanks for trying!!

ecsub44 · 1 August 2012, 01:38 PM

Apology accepted!

Mickey® · 1 August 2012, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ecsub44

Apology accepted!

Thanks.

Dan2010 · 1 August 2012, 10:44 PM

Mickey, Mickey, Mickey....................

azguy · 1 August 2012, 11:14 PM

Hey, we are human.....

mjclark32 · 1 August 2012, 11:13 PM

Love the no date (the original sub), but with my short term memory loss I need the date

mikkolopez · 1 August 2012, 11:22 PM

That's a mighty nice spread of THE SUBMARINER there. TFS.

Peahi · 2 August 2012, 02:19 AM

Good to see you've come around!

I have used that AD for my iphone wall paper and my computer wallpaper forever. Yes, I am a loser!!!

Mickey® · 2 August 2012, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikkolopez

That's a mighty nice spread of THE SUBMARINER there. TFS.

Welcome!!!

AeroEngineer1 · 2 August 2012, 02:43 AM

Some of those advertisements are stunning! What a nice read.

Mickey® · 2 August 2012, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeroEngineer1

Some of those advertisements are stunning! What a nice read.

Agreed!!!
But be careful or you'll be insulted by some that you hadn't read them sooner....

broncophil · 2 August 2012, 02:46 AM

i agree... love the ND

landroverking · 2 August 2012, 02:52 AM

Am I the only one it bugs when all the Sub freaks call the Sub no date.
In the Rolex world there is the Submainer and the submariner Date.

Johny · 2 August 2012, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by landroverking

Am I the only one it bugs when all the Sub freaks call the Sub no date.
In the Rolex world there is the Submainer and the submariner Date.

x2. the sub and the sub date.

Mickey® · 2 August 2012, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcubed

Think the point is that we often say "Submariner" for the (1)16610 and "No Date Sub" for the (1)14060, when technically we should be referring to the "Submariner" ((1)14060) and the "Submariner Date" ((1)16610))

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johny

x2. the sub and the sub date.

X3

I was lost but now am found!!!

Brenngun · 2 August 2012, 07:30 AM

Well Mickey I hope this thread has been a catharsis for you. Sub & Sub Date it has been and always will be

Mickey® · 2 August 2012, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brenngun

Well Mickey I hope this thread has been a catharsis for you. Sub & Sub Date it has been and always will be

Yes..I am late to the show on this one...I will sleep well now!

Feras · 2 August 2012, 04:58 AM

They also didn't have the glide lock at that time

mcubed · 2 August 2012, 05:13 AM

Think the point is that we often say "Submariner" for the (1)16610 and "No Date Sub" for the (1)14060, when technically we should be referring to the "Submariner" ((1)14060) and the "Submariner Date" ((1)16610))

U5512 · 2 August 2012, 06:08 AM

Mickey!

Yah, true Sub doesn't have date!!! Just like the Omega Speedmaster line, the true Speedmaster is the MOON WATCH!!!

drhanson · 2 August 2012, 08:38 AM

Dang it people, now I realized that I've got to get a 114060.......one of the problems with the Sub was that it's only an occasional wearer for me and being lazy, I'd rather not have to set the date when it gets wrist time (I'd rather let a movement rest than use a winder). The 114060 solves that issue and more; without the cyclops it is more understated and might even be written off as a non-Rolex piece with a glance by an uninformed or casual observer. The latter appeals to me about as much as the former. Lastly, if one were to actually do some diving with a Sub, I'd think it would be more practical to not have the cyclops. That extra 2mm of clearance may provide an ever so slightly lower chance of bumping it on something.

nauticajoe · 2 August 2012, 08:39 AM

Love the ad. Thanks for sharing.

moviefreak · 2 August 2012, 09:42 AM

There is only submariner and submariner date....
All the people saying no-date don't know what they are talking about...

Mickey® · 2 August 2012, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moviefreak

There is only submariner and submariner date....
All the people saying no-date don't know what they are talking about...

I now understand. I just "grew up" with a Submariner Date so it was always THE Submariner.

submariner66 · 2 August 2012, 12:35 PM

That was an excellent thread of pictures and ads, I think I will print some of those out and frame them! Interestingly on some of the later ads they were calling the Submariner Date, a Submariner. I like the old ads where they bothered to advertise these watches. Now they only advertise the gold ones. I guess back then they were the fancier watches of their time. No?

joffrey888 · 2 August 2012, 12:38 PM

personal choice guys.....no right & wrong choices....

1 August 2012, 01:21 PM	#1
Mickey® Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Mickey® Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Swiss Made Posts: 5,801	Rolex Submariner is a Non Date watch... I think I argued in the past that the SubDate is THE Rolex Submariner. I humbly stand corrected. LOOK AT THESE PAGES OF Submariners. NOT A ONE THAT IS with a DATE. My apologies.... Pages and pages to scroll...One pic for good measure. http://rolexblog.blogspot.com/2007/0...ough-time.html

1 August 2012, 01:38 PM	#6
ecsub44 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: US Watch: Sub Posts: 3,175	Apology accepted! __________________ *侘寂 -- wabi-sabi --* acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44

1 August 2012, 11:13 PM	#10
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Love the no date (the original sub), but with my short term memory loss I need the date __________________

2 August 2012, 05:13 AM	#23
mcubed "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: US Posts: 468	Think the point is that we often say "Submariner" for the (1)16610 and "No Date Sub" for the (1)14060, when technically we should be referring to the "Submariner" ((1)14060) and the "Submariner Date" ((1)16610)) __________________ The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist 2002 Rolex Submariner 14060 1963 Omega Automatic LL6304 1953 Wittnauer Revue 2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500

2 August 2012, 09:42 AM	#27
moviefreak "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: in my house... Posts: 5,524	There is only submariner and submariner date.... All the people saying no-date don't know what they are talking about... __________________ Cheers, Eduardo Be a WIS not a WUSS... and remove all the stickers..

1 August 2012, 01:27 PM	#2
drockadam "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Pepsi. Posts: 5,749	Either a Submariner No Date, or Submariner Date, I like them both! Though I prefer a Submariner Date, because of that nice 2.5x pearly white datewheel! Or a 1680 with a over-magnified date! But then again, a heavily patina'ed dial with a Black/Grey NATO. I love them all! Those Submariners

1 August 2012, 10:44 PM	#8
Dan2010 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: South Carolina Watch: Panerai 914 Posts: 6,540	Mickey, Mickey, Mickey....................

1 August 2012, 11:14 PM	#9
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	Hey, we are human.....

1 August 2012, 11:22 PM	#11
mikkolopez "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Philippines Posts: 2,301	That's a mighty nice spread of THE SUBMARINER there. TFS.

2 August 2012, 02:19 AM	#12
Peahi "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: San Francisco Posts: 51	Good to see you've come around! I have used that AD for my iphone wall paper and my computer wallpaper forever. Yes, I am a loser!!!

2 August 2012, 02:43 AM	#14
AeroEngineer1 Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Iowa Watch: Submariner Date Posts: 114	Some of those advertisements are stunning! What a nice read.

2 August 2012, 02:46 AM	#16
broncophil "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Cali Posts: 423	i agree... love the ND

2 August 2012, 02:52 AM	#17
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Am I the only one it bugs when all the Sub freaks call the Sub no date. In the Rolex world there is the Submainer and the submariner Date.

2 August 2012, 07:30 AM	#20
Brenngun 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Rick Location: Smokin' Heaven Watch: Rolex & Tudor Posts: 3,866	Well Mickey I hope this thread has been a catharsis for you. Sub & Sub Date it has been and always will be

2 August 2012, 04:58 AM	#22
Feras Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Feras Location: Bahrain Watch: Rolex,Tag Posts: 1,923	They also didn't have the glide lock at that time

2 August 2012, 08:38 AM	#25
drhanson "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Denver Posts: 51	Dang it people, now I realized that I've got to get a 114060.......one of the problems with the Sub was that it's only an occasional wearer for me and being lazy, I'd rather not have to set the date when it gets wrist time (I'd rather let a movement rest than use a winder). The 114060 solves that issue and more; without the cyclops it is more understated and might even be written off as a non-Rolex piece with a glance by an uninformed or casual observer. The latter appeals to me about as much as the former. Lastly, if one were to actually do some diving with a Sub, I'd think it would be more practical to not have the cyclops. That extra 2mm of clearance may provide an ever so slightly lower chance of bumping it on something.

2 August 2012, 08:39 AM	#26
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Love the ad. Thanks for sharing.

2 August 2012, 12:35 PM	#29
submariner66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: John Location: New Jersey Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,139	That was an excellent thread of pictures and ads, I think I will print some of those out and frame them! Interestingly on some of the later ads they were calling the Submariner Date, a Submariner. I like the old ads where they bothered to advertise these watches. Now they only advertise the gold ones. I guess back then they were the fancier watches of their time. No?

2 August 2012, 12:38 PM	#30
joffrey888 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: philippines Posts: 194	personal choice guys.....no right & wrong choices....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)