ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
23 August 2012, 12:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Utah
Watch: 16610-14000-16200
Posts: 56
|
They just look different in pictures...
I know this subject has been discussed to death, but, I shouldn't let that stop me. If folks were only able to post original theories, internet forums would needs lots less storage...
With that said, as an owner of a Sub Date, there was a small part of me that was keeping an eye open towards an upgrade to the new model w/ ceramic bezel. After spending some time with one the other day, I was left feeling really great about the watch I have. In pictures I really like the look of the ceramic bezel and larger case. In person there is just a little too much bling in the new model for my taste. It is just a little less "tool like" than the one I own. Finally, the size of the 16610 seems just right to me. That isn't to say that the 116610 isn't incredibly impressive. I've just decided that for now, it isn't for me. So... instead of new 116610... I'm going to set my sights on keeping my 16610 and finding a 14060. Isn't this a great hobby? :)
__________________
16610 A Series Sub Date, 116000 Oyster Perpetual Omega 2502.50 Co-axial Aqua Terra Omega 2541.80 Seamaster Professional Breitling SuperOcean Heritage,Seiko Grand Seiko SBGX063,Seiko SBDX001 MarineMaster, Oris Divers Date |
23 August 2012, 01:00 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Ahh, it's a relief isn't it? Meaning now you know FOR SURE that the new Sub isn't for you. Makes all the difference in the world to see pieces in real life!
|
23 August 2012, 01:02 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I like the classic 16610 and 14060's myself.
|
23 August 2012, 01:06 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 208
|
Agree. Seeing it in the flesh is a whole new world compared to just drooling over pictures on the net. The same happened to me on the 216570. Loved the picutres, did nothing for me when I saw it in the metal. No offense to those who love the 216570.
|
23 August 2012, 01:05 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: johannesburg
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 4,407
|
But you are slightly bias, I wonder if a newbie would feel the same way?
Would he rather go old school or get the latest bad boy? Glad your happy with yours |
23 August 2012, 01:16 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Utah
Watch: 16610-14000-16200
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
It is why I like the great German car makers. When you look at a new 3 Series BMW you are able to to see a whisper of a '68 2002 in them. And, if you've driven both cars, you can see the faint trace of one of the original sports sedans in the new model. When you drive a new 911 you can see in it its roots in the model from almost 5 decades ago. This is the case with Rolex. When you see the 116600 there is no doubt that it is a Rolex. My 22 year old son would certainly prefer the new model, and, maybe someday I will too. I would love a DSSD.... :)
__________________
16610 A Series Sub Date, 116000 Oyster Perpetual Omega 2502.50 Co-axial Aqua Terra Omega 2541.80 Seamaster Professional Breitling SuperOcean Heritage,Seiko Grand Seiko SBGX063,Seiko SBDX001 MarineMaster, Oris Divers Date |
|
23 August 2012, 01:59 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
I'm newbie and prefer new vs. old, that's why I went with DJII over DJ.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
23 August 2012, 01:34 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: Subs
Posts: 689
|
I'm a noob and bought 3 old school ones.
|
23 August 2012, 01:56 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Brett
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 140
|
I actually prefer the new model because of the extra bling. For me the SubC is a jewelry piece. I'll never use it for diving so the fact that it's less of a "tool" type of watch than it used to be - doesn't bother me.
That being said, I can see where Sub purists and particularly divers, would prefer the old style. |
23 August 2012, 01:59 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
|
Same thing happened to me with DD2. I was excited about the watch in photos, but ended up buying the DD in rose gold, and loving it on my wrist.
But it's nice to KNOW rather than guess. |
23 August 2012, 03:31 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Feras
Location: Bahrain
Watch: Rolex,Tag
Posts: 1,923
|
Pics always differnt. Nothing better than personaly trying the watches. Big relief
|
23 August 2012, 03:38 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
Good idea to set your sights elsewhere. Looking at your existing collection, and before you settle on a 14060, have you eliminated a GMT already?
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.