ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
10 September 2012, 10:14 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Justin
Location: Jupiter, FL
Watch: 1530,1665,1680
Posts: 2,064
|
Gmt 1675 mk.1
This watch is supposed to be original and the serial is 1.8 Mil. I have compared the pics from Orchi's thread and think the dial is the correct MK.1 for the watch.
Do the experts agree and does everything look okay? What about the GMT hand as the red paint seems a little short? |
10 September 2012, 10:47 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex,Panerai, JLC
Posts: 297
|
JustinK, I'm no expert. However I agree the 24 hour hand appears "short" and
possibly repainted red? The dial to my untrained eyes looks okay. Best, smith one |
10 September 2012, 12:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Dial is correct, but need more pictures. What's up with the font on the insert, is that from the exposure of a shaky camera? I've seen where the red is chipping from the GMT hand before, but could also be aftermarket issue. Not crazy about the hands being off color and not matching the plots. Cant tell anything about the case without more images.
|
10 September 2012, 11:01 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Myplaceintheworld
Posts: 360
|
correct dial for that serial number. insert is ok. hands looks different patina, but it may occur. nothing wrong in my opinion.
|
11 September 2012, 12:04 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Weird effect on the insert at 2 & 4 ?
Dial looks good on quick inspection
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.