ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
15 September 2012, 09:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nyc
Posts: 2
|
Pitting/Corrosion to Vintage Datejust
Hey Everyone,
I just purchased a Datejust 16030 (1978-79). I took it to RSC in NY and they recommended a new case frame due to corrosion. I understand that this corrosion can compromise the waterproof ability of the watch, but this won't be for diving or even daily use for that matter. I've read that for a watch of this age, pitting and corrosion are very common. In any case, the price for all of RSC work is exorbitant and far more than I had bargained for. If I skip getting a new case frame, am I playing with fire? Should I just get the movement overhauled by a reputable watchmaker, new acrylic and a polish and call it a day? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. This forum and all its knowledgeable members have been an invaluable resource of info. Best, Ron |
15 September 2012, 11:48 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Did they recommend a new case-frame, or require a new one.. There is a difference..
If it was just a recommendation, you do not have to purchase. I probably would not in that instance. If it is a requirement, then they are telling you that your case is no longer viable for whatever reason. In that case, you need to decide what you want out of this watch.. There are very good restoration specialists, such as Bob Ridley at Watchmakers.com, who can rebuild and remachine a lost case to serviceable condition..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
15 September 2012, 01:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nyc
Posts: 2
|
The estimate said it was a requirement.
I reached out to Bob today and spoke with Barbara. Really friendly and helpful. The estimate was more reasonable than Rolex and Bob is highly recommended. Overall, what I want from this watch is a special occasion timepiece. I don't want to sink more into the watch than what I spent to acquire it, but I also don't want it to be non-functional in the next couple months or year. In your experience or knowledge of older/vintage Rolex timepieces, would I be taking a huge risk in overlooking the case-frame issue for the purposes of the watch I described? Or just enjoy the vintage watch for what it is? All of the parts are original Rolex and I really love the dial (which is the reason I purchased it). Thanks for your comments. |
16 September 2012, 01:23 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Quote:
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
15 September 2012, 02:02 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
take some before and after photos. good luck.
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.