ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

bycrom · 23 November 2012, 06:22 AM

Just a quick note, a week ago I had some concern about my brand new 116610LN's accuracy when being used during active use.

I set it to http://www.time.gov seven days ago and have been wearing it 24x7; to the gym, bike rides, yoga, wrestling with crazy 8 year old kid :-), and it is off now by less than 1 second positive.

Very impressive.

So that thread, which I will update with this threads results, was definitely user error IMHO.

rolexperfect · 23 November 2012, 06:41 AM

Uff. Good to know then! Thanks for reporting about it. I'll be getting mine in two more weeks

mjclark32 · 23 November 2012, 07:09 AM

Good to hear, wear it well!

joe100 · 23 November 2012, 07:14 AM

Not bad at all.

Hairdude1 · 23 November 2012, 10:37 AM

brkanand · 23 November 2012, 10:39 AM

So we have yet another satisfied member. Good to know and thanks for sharing

financeman · 23 November 2012, 11:41 AM

Most of the time it is operator error on a new watch. Glad it worked out for ya

Trouble15 · 23 November 2012, 01:14 PM

Very nice

Bulldurham08 · 23 November 2012, 01:19 PM

Good update! Glad to hear it has worked out well for you!

tdegroot · 23 November 2012, 01:23 PM

I've got a 14060m and a SubC. I also have observed that whatever one that I happen to wear "constantly" seems to keep better time.

seand442 · 23 November 2012, 01:23 PM

Sounds like a keeper.

mmmk604 · 23 November 2012, 02:33 PM

That's incredible...mine is around -1s/day

I'm still happy with it. My new DJ was +4s /day

p_mcgee · 23 November 2012, 02:34 PM

Mine's inside +1 sec/day. Not sure how Rolex does it but simply awesome.

boywondergq1 · 23 November 2012, 03:10 PM

Ahhh that's good to hear and makes a heck of a lot more sense! Glad that all is settled now and you must feel awesome!

HRV · 23 November 2012, 03:14 PM

Htab · 23 November 2012, 03:36 PM

Nice

23 November 2012, 06:22 AM	#1
bycrom "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: 116610LN Posts: 156	New 116610LN <+1 sec a week Just a quick note, a week ago I had some concern about my brand new 116610LN's accuracy when being used during active use. I set it to http://www.time.gov seven days ago and have been wearing it 24x7; to the gym, bike rides, yoga, wrestling with crazy 8 year old kid :-), and it is off now by less than 1 second positive. Very impressive. So that thread, which I will update with this threads results, was definitely user error IMHO.

23 November 2012, 06:41 AM	#2
rolexperfect "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: around the world Watch: 116506 Posts: 1,370	Uff. Good to know then! Thanks for reporting about it. I'll be getting mine in two more weeks __________________ “buy what you like, and be done with it“

23 November 2012, 07:09 AM	#3
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Good to hear, wear it well! __________________

23 November 2012, 07:14 AM	#4
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	Not bad at all. __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

23 November 2012, 11:41 AM	#7
financeman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Heath Location: Lawrenceburg KY Watch: Submariner Posts: 3,982	Most of the time it is operator error on a new watch. Glad it worked out for ya __________________ “You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin

23 November 2012, 10:37 AM	#5
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156

23 November 2012, 10:39 AM	#6
brkanand 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: DrK Location: India Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk Posts: 7,052	So we have yet another satisfied member. Good to know and thanks for sharing

23 November 2012, 01:14 PM	#8
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,884	Very nice

23 November 2012, 01:19 PM	#9
Bulldurham08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Kyle Location: PA Watch: 116610LN Posts: 404	Good update! Glad to hear it has worked out well for you! __________________ Rolex Datejust II 116300 (new watch swagger in full effect)

23 November 2012, 01:23 PM	#10
tdegroot "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: Wisconsin, USA Watch: 14060M & SubC Posts: 243	I've got a 14060m and a SubC. I also have observed that whatever one that I happen to wear "constantly" seems to keep better time.

23 November 2012, 01:23 PM	#11
seand442 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Earth Watch: 116610 Posts: 3,455	Sounds like a keeper. __________________ NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.

23 November 2012, 02:33 PM	#12
mmmk604 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Canada Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,594	That's incredible...mine is around -1s/day I'm still happy with it. My new DJ was +4s /day

23 November 2012, 02:34 PM	#13
p_mcgee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,150	Mine's inside +1 sec/day. Not sure how Rolex does it but simply awesome.

23 November 2012, 03:10 PM	#14
boywondergq1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 792	Ahhh that's good to hear and makes a heck of a lot more sense! Glad that all is settled now and you must feel awesome! __________________ "Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes." - Oscar Wilde

23 November 2012, 03:14 PM	#15
HRV "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Andrew Location: johannesburg Watch: ROLEX Posts: 4,407

23 November 2012, 03:36 PM	#16
Htab 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Dad Location: USA Watch: To many Posts: 1,389	Nice

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)