ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 November 2012, 05:32 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
14060m Bracelet VS 16610 Bracelet
Hi folks,
Can someone list the strong points and weaknesses of one bracelet over another? Thank you, |
29 November 2012, 05:35 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
|
clasp is the big difference for me.
|
29 November 2012, 05:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ron
Location: BayArea/SanDiego
Watch: AP
Posts: 427
|
|
29 November 2012, 06:38 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
the clasps are the same, essentially. The only real differences are the SEL and the improved Diver extension that locks into the clasp on the 93250. One can decide for theirself if that is a strength or weakness..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
29 November 2012, 09:19 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
Thank you for the info!
|
29 November 2012, 05:40 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
|
29 November 2012, 05:58 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Toronto
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 74
|
|
29 November 2012, 09:20 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
|
|
29 November 2012, 06:31 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
|
14060M bracelet never have SEL, the diver extension is more noisy, and its very comfortable :)
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.