ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 January 2013, 04:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 21
|
Rolex accuracy
Whats is the Rolex aceptable accuracy?
|
5 January 2013, 04:42 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
The COSC spec for all movements of the Rolex size is that at time of testing the bare uncased movement performed to a AVERAGE of between -4 to + 6 seconds over any 24 hour period.Myself not too anal about time but as long as they keep around the COSC spec thats fine for me.Last time a checked my wearing watch was around two weeks ago then it was less than a minute fast.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
5 January 2013, 05:00 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Marbella
Watch: Exp 216570 Polar
Posts: 357
|
Ive found it varies a lot depending on what youre doing (how active), if the watch is off the wrist, the ambience temperature, how wound the spring is etc. I generally get between what padi says, -1 to +4 per day on average. If I keep fairly still, and the watch is fully wound, it seems almost at +/- 0!
|
5 January 2013, 06:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Porto and the UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 176
|
my 6 day old makes between +1 and +2 per day, and -1 overnight on the dresser crown down
happy with that, but it matches standard grade eta 2824s I own... |
5 January 2013, 07:55 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
My 1-year old Cal 3135 has, from day 1, been steady at +0.7 sec/day on a winder at night and when worn all day.
That's 20 seconds per month. All buy the highest grades of quartz territory. |
5 January 2013, 08:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
|
My GMT IIc usually is between 1.0 - 1,5 seconds off per 24 hours.
Lately I have not been wearing it (got an Omega for Christmas). It has been laying flat face up all the time and I have manually wined it every morning. Just for kicks I have measured it against the atomic clock and it's been consistently less than 0,5 seconds off per day! That's really insane accuracy even for Rolex For your question: Even though Rolex is guarantied to keep within the COSC-standard I believe the COSC-standard is somewhat dated. You should expect (a modern) Rolex to keep well within that. If not I would have it regulated.
__________________
Bård |
5 January 2013, 07:57 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
What Padi said...
AVERAGE of between -4 to + 6 seconds over any 24 hour period |
5 January 2013, 08:10 AM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Acceptable to who and acceptable for what ???
I don't care what the COSC specs are, I will get any Rolex I own regulated if it gets out by 5 seconds fast or 2 seconds slow in 24 hours.. I prefer them to be around 2 seconds fast or better...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
6 January 2013, 11:59 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
x2.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
5 January 2013, 08:24 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
-4 +6, my sub is a bit fast, +3 or so
__________________
|
5 January 2013, 09:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ & FL
Posts: 168
|
Of all the watched I have owned, Rolex keeps the worst time.
A $5 Timex I won in college kept the best time. |
5 January 2013, 08:47 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
So will most any other quartz watches no matter the make or price.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
5 January 2013, 10:44 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
|
It's meaningless to compare an electronic quartz-watch to any mechanical watch. You don't buy a mechanical watch solely for accuracy
__________________
Bård |
5 January 2013, 08:49 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
2 February 2013, 12:42 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Dan
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: Rolex Turn-O-Graph
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
Since then I have reset the watch every morning when I come into the office. On travel days, I just stop the watch for 8 seconds. Also, I am testing different "resting" positions, and I'm within COSC (+4) when I store the watch crown down at night. Next week I will try crown up. |
|
5 January 2013, 09:06 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: australia
Posts: 49
|
I still dont understand..
So say a watch is fast 2 seconds a day then when worn for a month it would be a whole minute out? Is this acceptable by cosc standards? or should it only ever be either -4 or + 6 seconds and stay within these specs for say the month period? At the moment my sub c is about 6 seconds fast and i set the time 7 days ago. does this mean its running aprox 1 second fast per day? |
5 January 2013, 09:59 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Quote:
|
|
6 January 2013, 04:47 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
6 January 2013, 12:29 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
A watch that is 2 seconds a day off (+-) is 99.8% accurate. In all seriousness, if that's not acceptable then a mechanical watch is not for you. If you have a Rolex that is not running within COSC spec it can be regulated to do so.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
6 January 2013, 02:43 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
2 seconds out per day is 99.998% accurate ! ! ! |
|
6 January 2013, 03:08 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Ooopsy, I must have been spell checking my words when I should have been checking my numbers. Meant to type 99.9%. Thanks for the correction.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
7 January 2013, 01:51 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York
Watch: WG & YG DJ/Prsdnt
Posts: 572
|
|
5 January 2013, 10:17 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
My lowly pre-cert 17000 gains 2 seconds a month.
.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki" 19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 |
6 January 2013, 03:33 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Buddy
Location: Sunny California
Watch: 16610, 16750
Posts: 172
|
+4 seconds a day for me. So when I set my time, set it few minutes late... :)
|
6 January 2013, 05:09 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
I set my SS Sub to time.gov on 18DEC12 at 1934. 18 Days later (I just checked), my watch is 32 seconds fast. So, I gained a 0.5625 seconds per day, but will note that this fractional second gain occurred some time after 21DEC12, when I stopped checking my watch like a mad scientist; as of then it was deadly accurate. Is this acceptable?
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
6 January 2013, 09:19 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
Quote:
.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki" 19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 |
|
6 January 2013, 05:18 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
If I really had to know the time I'd buy I'd wear this....
|
6 January 2013, 11:57 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Or this when you lose your signal Mickey.
__________________
E |
6 January 2013, 09:21 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
As long as it's within COSC tolerance, (-4/+6 secs a day) it's fine.
If not, then it's not performing as it promised (after all, that's what SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALY CERTIFIED means) take it back to your RSC to have it regulated. |
6 January 2013, 10:54 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Connor
Location: USA
Watch: 214270
Posts: 132
|
Those arent quite the standards -4/+6
if you look that is what the watch should be at the worst at its best it should be +/-1 see http://www.chronocentric.com/watches/accuracy.shtml |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.