The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 January 2013, 04:35 AM   #1
Comissaria
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brazil
Posts: 21
Rolex accuracy

Whats is the Rolex aceptable accuracy?
Comissaria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 04:42 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comissaria View Post
Whats is the Rolex aceptable accuracy?
The COSC spec for all movements of the Rolex size is that at time of testing the bare uncased movement performed to a AVERAGE of between -4 to + 6 seconds over any 24 hour period.Myself not too anal about time but as long as they keep around the COSC spec thats fine for me.Last time a checked my wearing watch was around two weeks ago then it was less than a minute fast.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 05:00 AM   #3
Magic-Matt
"TRF" Member
 
Magic-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Marbella
Watch: Exp 216570 Polar
Posts: 357
Ive found it varies a lot depending on what youre doing (how active), if the watch is off the wrist, the ambience temperature, how wound the spring is etc. I generally get between what padi says, -1 to +4 per day on average. If I keep fairly still, and the watch is fully wound, it seems almost at +/- 0!
Magic-Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 06:42 AM   #4
adzman808
"TRF" Member
 
adzman808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Porto and the UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 176
my 6 day old makes between +1 and +2 per day, and -1 overnight on the dresser crown down

happy with that, but it matches standard grade eta 2824s I own...
adzman808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 07:55 AM   #5
DJJon
"TRF" Member
 
DJJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
My 1-year old Cal 3135 has, from day 1, been steady at +0.7 sec/day on a winder at night and when worn all day.

That's 20 seconds per month. All buy the highest grades of quartz territory.
DJJon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:21 AM   #6
bardm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
My GMT IIc usually is between 1.0 - 1,5 seconds off per 24 hours.

Lately I have not been wearing it (got an Omega for Christmas). It has been laying flat face up all the time and I have manually wined it every morning. Just for kicks I have measured it against the atomic clock and it's been consistently less than 0,5 seconds off per day! That's really insane accuracy even for Rolex

For your question: Even though Rolex is guarantied to keep within the COSC-standard I believe the COSC-standard is somewhat dated. You should expect (a modern) Rolex to keep well within that. If not I would have it regulated.
__________________
Bård
bardm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 07:57 AM   #7
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
What Padi said...
AVERAGE of between -4 to + 6 seconds over any 24 hour period
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:10 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comissaria View Post
Whats is the Rolex aceptable accuracy?
Acceptable to who and acceptable for what ???

I don't care what the COSC specs are, I will get any Rolex I own regulated if it gets out by 5 seconds fast or 2 seconds slow in 24 hours.. I prefer them to be around 2 seconds fast or better...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 11:59 AM   #9
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by tools View Post
acceptable to who and acceptable for what ???

I don't care what the cosc specs are, i will get any rolex i own regulated if it gets out by 5 seconds fast or 2 seconds slow in 24 hours.. I prefer them to be around 2 seconds fast or better...
x2.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:24 AM   #10
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
-4 +6, my sub is a bit fast, +3 or so
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 09:22 AM   #11
dssxxxx
"TRF" Member
 
dssxxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ & FL
Posts: 168
Of all the watched I have owned, Rolex keeps the worst time.

A $5 Timex I won in college kept the best time.
dssxxxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:47 PM   #12
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by dssxxxx View Post
Of all the watched I have owned, Rolex keeps the worst time.

A $5 Timex I won in college kept the best time.
So will most any other quartz watches no matter the make or price.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 10:44 PM   #13
bardm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by dssxxxx View Post
Of all the watched I have owned, Rolex keeps the worst time.

A $5 Timex I won in college kept the best time.
It's meaningless to compare an electronic quartz-watch to any mechanical watch. You don't buy a mechanical watch solely for accuracy
__________________
Bård
bardm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:49 PM   #14
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comissaria View Post
Whats is the Rolex aceptable accuracy?
have you ever been late to a meeting/missed a flight because your Rolex was not accurate?
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 February 2013, 12:42 AM   #15
VADanno
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Dan
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: Rolex Turn-O-Graph
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally Posted by esm View Post
have you ever been late to a meeting/missed a flight because your Rolex was not accurate?
No, but I did fire someone for being late to a meeting. I questioned later whether my Rolex was off, as it gains 8 seconds a day when placed crystal up at night. It was not off by the three minutes she was late. And she had just been written up earlier in the week AND the VP Ops was the presenter at the meeting.

Since then I have reset the watch every morning when I come into the office. On travel days, I just stop the watch for 8 seconds. Also, I am testing different "resting" positions, and I'm within COSC (+4) when I store the watch crown down at night. Next week I will try crown up.
VADanno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 09:06 PM   #16
bjpk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: australia
Posts: 49
I still dont understand..
So say a watch is fast 2 seconds a day then when worn for a month it would be a whole
minute out?
Is this acceptable by cosc standards?
or should it only ever be either -4 or + 6 seconds and stay within these specs for say the month period?
At the moment my sub c is about 6 seconds fast and i set the time 7 days ago.
does this mean its running aprox 1 second fast per day?
bjpk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 09:59 PM   #17
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjpk View Post
I still dont understand..
So say a watch is fast 2 seconds a day then when worn for a month it would be a whole
minute out?
Is this acceptable by cosc standards?
or should it only ever be either -4 or + 6 seconds and stay within these specs for say the month period?
At the moment my sub c is about 6 seconds fast and i set the time 7 days ago.
does this mean its running aprox 1 second fast per day?
See post 2. Your watch is within COSC.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 04:47 AM   #18
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjpk View Post
I still dont understand..
So say a watch is fast 2 seconds a day then when worn for a month it would be a whole
minute out?
Is this acceptable by cosc standards?
or should it only ever be either -4 or + 6 seconds and stay within these specs for say the month period?
At the moment my sub c is about 6 seconds fast and i set the time 7 days ago.
does this mean its running aprox 1 second fast per day?
Well I would have thought that was perfectly obvious you don't even need a mathematician to work that one out.The COSC spec like I posted in the second post is that the watch should perform to a AVERAGE of between -4 to + 6 seconds a day over a 24 hour period or better.I cannot put it any plainer than that,and your watches is well inside that, remember there are 86400 seconds in 24 hours and.And no purely mechanical watch at any price or brand will keep 100% perfect time.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 12:29 PM   #19
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjpk View Post
I still dont understand..
So say a watch is fast 2 seconds a day then when worn for a month it would be a whole
minute out? YES.
Is this acceptable by cosc standards? YES.
or should it only ever be either -4 or + 6 seconds and stay within these specs for say the month period? NO.
At the moment my sub c is about 6 seconds fast and i set the time 7 days ago.
does this mean its running aprox 1 second fast per day? YES.

A watch that is 2 seconds a day off (+-) is 99.8% accurate. In all seriousness, if that's not acceptable then a mechanical watch is not for you.

If you have a Rolex that is not running within COSC spec it can be regulated to do so.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 02:43 PM   #20
DJJon
"TRF" Member
 
DJJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Ferguson View Post
A watch that is 2 seconds a day off (+-) is 99.8% accurate. In all seriousness, if that's not acceptable then a mechanical watch is not for you.

If you have a Rolex that is not running within COSC spec it can be regulated to do so.
NO NO NO NO

2 seconds out per day is 99.998% accurate ! ! !
DJJon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 03:08 PM   #21
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJJon View Post
NO NO NO NO

2 seconds out per day is 99.998% accurate ! ! !
Ooopsy, I must have been spell checking my words when I should have been checking my numbers. Meant to type 99.9%. Thanks for the correction.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2013, 01:51 AM   #22
Venusfly
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York
Watch: WG & YG DJ/Prsdnt
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Ferguson View Post
A watch that is 2 seconds a day off (+-) is 99.8% accurate. In all seriousness, if that's not acceptable then a mechanical watch is not for you.

If you have a Rolex that is not running within COSC spec it can be regulated to do so.
X2
Venusfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 10:17 PM   #23
Czechman
"TRF" Member
 
Czechman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
My lowly pre-cert 17000 gains 2 seconds a month.





.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki"

19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610

Czechman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 03:33 AM   #24
west8720
"TRF" Member
 
west8720's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Buddy
Location: Sunny California
Watch: 16610, 16750
Posts: 172
+4 seconds a day for me. So when I set my time, set it few minutes late... :)
west8720 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 05:09 AM   #25
Armyguy03
"TRF" Member
 
Armyguy03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
I set my SS Sub to time.gov on 18DEC12 at 1934. 18 Days later (I just checked), my watch is 32 seconds fast. So, I gained a 0.5625 seconds per day, but will note that this fractional second gain occurred some time after 21DEC12, when I stopped checking my watch like a mad scientist; as of then it was deadly accurate. Is this acceptable?
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Armyguy03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 09:19 PM   #26
Czechman
"TRF" Member
 
Czechman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armyguy03 View Post
I set my SS Sub to time.gov on 18DEC12 at 1934. 18 Days later (I just checked), my watch is 32 seconds fast. So, I gained a 0.5625 seconds per day
Actually your watch gained 1.78 sec per day. That's 32 divided by 18, not the other way around.





.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki"

19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610

Czechman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 05:18 AM   #27
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
If I really had to know the time I'd buy I'd wear this....

Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 11:57 AM   #28
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
If I really had to know the time I'd buy I'd wear this....

Or this when you lose your signal Mickey.
Attached Images
 
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 09:21 AM   #29
How
"TRF" Member
 
How's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
As long as it's within COSC tolerance, (-4/+6 secs a day) it's fine.

If not, then it's not performing as it promised (after all, that's what SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALY CERTIFIED means) take it back to your RSC to have it regulated.
How is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2013, 10:54 AM   #30
connorperson
"TRF" Member
 
connorperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Connor
Location: USA
Watch: 214270
Posts: 132
Those arent quite the standards -4/+6

if you look that is what the watch should be at the worst

at its best it should be +/-1

see http://www.chronocentric.com/watches/accuracy.shtml
connorperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.