The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 January 2013, 02:05 AM   #1
lsavoldi
"TRF" Member
 
lsavoldi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: brazil
Posts: 196
Panerai and wrist size

Hi guys,
First post on this forum.
Long time vintage Rolex collector, who have recently fell in love with Panerai.
I am looking to purchase my first one and I am a bit concerned about size.
I have a rather small wrist, 6.25, and believe the 40mm model is the most suitable.
Anyone with small wrists wearing 42/44 models ? It would be great to see some pics.
Many thanks in advance
Luciano
lsavoldi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 02:28 AM   #2
wingku
"TRF" Member
 
wingku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Wing
Location: Calgary,AB,Canada
Watch: the World unfold
Posts: 1,019
I have a small wrist and I wear a 112. I think it fits nicely and I don't really care what other ppl think as long as I enjoy it.

Physically try some models on is the best way before you pull the trigger!

Good luck!!
wingku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 02:32 AM   #3
rr-nyc
Liar & Ratbag
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
I have a smallish wrist (6.5") My first PAM was a 40mm because I thought it would look more proportionate... What a mistake. From the minute I got it, I couldn't wait until the day I bought a 44mm. Try on both but understand the the look of a Panerai is lost in the 40mm... It looks like a ladies version of the 44mm

As long as the lugs don't extend beyond your wrists, it's completely fine.
rr-nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 02:33 AM   #4
dr3ziz
"TRF" Member
 
dr3ziz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Aziz
Location: London/kuwait
Posts: 912
I have a 6.5" wrist and wear a 47 mm ,, no problems at all
it just what you are used to see on your wrist ,,,
plus i never got a negative comment on the size of my 422 all the comments where positive
dr3ziz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 02:37 AM   #5
dr3ziz
"TRF" Member
 
dr3ziz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Aziz
Location: London/kuwait
Posts: 912
Here are a couple
Attached Images
   
dr3ziz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 03:20 AM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I have a 6.5" wrist

44mm


47mm
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2015, 12:39 PM   #7
vtsnowplow
"TRF" Member
 
vtsnowplow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I have a 6.5" wrist

44mm


47mm
those look huge!
vtsnowplow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 03:33 AM   #8
opelrsx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17
I have a 6.3'' wrist.. 44mm EVERYDAY
opelrsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 03:38 AM   #9
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
I have a 6" wrist, I own few different sizes, 40, 42, and now a 47mm. It is matter of personal preference, there is no right or wrong .. It just how you like it! with a small wrist like us.... It mostly about the thickness of the watch.
Good luck!

Pam 050-40mm



Pam 336 - 42mm



Pam 448 - 47mm
Attached Images
 
skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 06:16 AM   #10
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
Six and three quarters here. I started with a 42mm 338, then after I got used to it decided to add a 44mm base Luminor, but ended up with a 233. I have tried on 47s and they no longer seem that big.



__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 07:14 AM   #11
lsavoldi
"TRF" Member
 
lsavoldi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: brazil
Posts: 196
Thanks for all inputs!
Not so sold to a 40 mm anymore
lsavoldi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 09:41 AM   #12
Rodentman
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
I have a 40mm, a 42mm and a 44mm. I am considering a 422 which is 47mm. Here are some photos.

40mm PAM241





42mm PAM392



44mm PAM176



I acknowledge that the camera angles at least in my crappy photos somewhat distorts the size on the wrist. The 40mm is not a large as it appears, but I can accept all of them. As others have said, I don't care what conventional wisdom is regarding how a PAM should look or wear. I like the 214 @ 40mm especially on the SS old style bracelet.

Frankly I am considering abandoning my quest for the 422 since I think 47mm is too large. My wrist is just about 7".
Rodentman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 February 2015, 12:40 PM   #13
vtsnowplow
"TRF" Member
 
vtsnowplow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodentman View Post
I have a 40mm, a 42mm and a 44mm. I am considering a 422 which is 47mm. Here are some photos.

40mm PAM241





42mm PAM392



44mm PAM176



I acknowledge that the camera angles at least in my crappy photos somewhat distorts the size on the wrist. The 40mm is not a large as it appears, but I can accept all of them. As others have said, I don't care what conventional wisdom is regarding how a PAM should look or wear. I like the 214 @ 40mm especially on the SS old style bracelet.

Frankly I am considering abandoning my quest for the 422 since I think 47mm is too large. My wrist is just about 7".
the 40mm looks the best
vtsnowplow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 11:22 AM   #14
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
You might try a 44mm Luminor case: 111, 005, 000 or similar.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 01:49 PM   #15
DT14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
Recently bought a 42 and think it is just right. Personally, I think some of the above wrist shots prove that you can go a little overboard on the size if you have a small wrist.
DT14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2013, 02:27 PM   #16
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
If I may suggest going into the store and try on the 40mm vs. 44mm. The difference is HUGE! 44mm fit great on my 6.5 inch wrist and 40mm just look a little off for me vs my wrist proportion.
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 12:02 AM   #17
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
My wife has 5.5" and wears 40mm just fine.

I say with 6.3" go with a 44mm Luminor or a 45mm Radiomir. The Radiomir will wear smaller even though it is 45mm.

My wrist is 6.5" and I wear 44mm, 45mm and now 47mm
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 12:14 AM   #18
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
I think you'll be fine with any size. Just make sure you try them first and like them as some of them wear quite differently from others, even if they are the same diameter.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 12:33 AM   #19
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
6.25" wrist.
Attached Images
 
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 02:59 AM   #20
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
Stick with 44mm and avoid regret.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 03:05 AM   #21
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
I would opt for 44mm & have an easy option to flip for smaller if you find it too big, than start small & face a more challenging flip when the urge to go larger starts nagging away.
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 04:58 AM   #22
lsavoldi
"TRF" Member
 
lsavoldi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: brazil
Posts: 196
Guys,
You have convinced me. I'll go for a 44!!
I like a clean dial, therefore it will be 111, 000 or 176.
Recommendations?
thanks
lsavoldi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 05:16 AM   #23
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by lsavoldi View Post
Guys,
You have convinced me. I'll go for a 44!!
I like a clean dial, therefore it will be 111, 000 or 176.
Recommendations?
thanks
I like the zero a lot, unless you could get a hold of a 390 or one of the Boutique Editions, i.e, 416, 417, etc.
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 05:40 AM   #24
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
All 3 are winners, no wrong choice so just go with what makes you smile most & good call on 44mm.
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 January 2013, 10:09 PM   #25
sharpmind
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 98
44 is comfortable
Attached Images
 
sharpmind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2013, 02:25 AM   #26
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
You could easily go 44mm.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2013, 03:20 AM   #27
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
Of those choice I would suggest the 000. Can't go wrong with a base logo.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2013, 05:01 AM   #28
lsavoldi
"TRF" Member
 
lsavoldi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: brazil
Posts: 196
what do you guys think?
Was offered a BNIB 112 for 5,395. Can i get a better deal elsewhere?
thanks,
lsavoldi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2013, 05:10 AM   #29
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
See http://www.watchrecon.com/ for going market rates but trust in seller is more important than lowest price for me.. within reason of course. One of the trusted go-to guys here @ TRF would be your best bet.
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 January 2013, 12:32 PM   #30
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
I have a 6.25 inch wrist also. You should be fine with the 44 and 45 mm models. The "trick" is to get the strap fitting snug. My 233 is about the limit for me. Thicker models (e.g. 312) might be too much for my wimpy wrists.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.