ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
10 December 2007, 08:29 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
Why "all" want big watches???
Hi!
Maybe I am a conservative guy.... to be >30years.... Why do "all" teenagers wear ~45mm big bling bling watches now? Now, spec. girls? I think the Rolex models define a very good standard. 32mm for ladies, 34mm "Boy", 36mm for men daily and 40mm for men for sport/casual. I think (my op.) people wear a big watch (>43mm) just to "show"...Or is it? What is the point of super large watches? Hmmm I wear Rolex and JeagerLeC daily - I never show my watch to everyone... It is under my shirt all the time. Fat watch prevents you to have it under your shirt.... My girl friend says she will never wear a large men watch.
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
10 December 2007, 09:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
I don't want a big watch anymore. I had a few 44mm Panerai through out the years and I got tired of the large size on my relatively thin 6 3/4" wrists. I am happy with ~40mm max.
|
10 December 2007, 09:42 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
Me too. Finally, one agrees with me. I think 40mm is a nice and comfortable size...
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
10 December 2007, 09:47 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: USA
Watch: DJ, DD, SUB
Posts: 487
|
I'm happy with my two 36mm's.
__________________
TT Datejust 16233 (T) SOLD YG Daydate 11833 (K SS Sub Date 16610 (M). SOLD TT Blue Sub Date 116613LB (Random, 2018?) |
11 December 2007, 10:27 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
|
|
11 December 2007, 07:07 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
Yes,
Yes, I mean Rolex. 40mm is perfect. I havn't tried the YM II...but I will def. not buy it. A sport Rolex bigger than 40mm is too heavy compared to its bracelet. And 40mm Rolex case is the classic design. I hope Rolex does not make bigger than the sub and GMT IIc.
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
12 December 2007, 03:53 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
|
Quote:
Back when they came out with 40mm, I wonder what people were saying owing those 36/32/26mm watches. "Rolex is selling pocket watches on a bracelet!"
__________________
|
|
12 December 2007, 06:38 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
|
|
10 December 2007, 09:53 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ..
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 1,820
|
I agree.... 40mm's is the limit for me...
|
10 December 2007, 10:27 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
People are getting fatter, you haven't heard?
This way, a bigger watch covers the wrist better.
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
10 December 2007, 10:49 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
Actually, the part of the world where big watches are really being sold, and the majority of mechanical watches are being sold, is a part of the world where on average the body size and other parts are smaller than in America. The 444 crowd (as Thai's refer to a rival group from Asia).
People are getting fatter, you haven't heard? This way, a bigger watch covers the wrist better. But, I think you just described me USMC!! LOL LOL Guess I need to go shop for a Panerai!!! LOL LOL |
10 December 2007, 10:51 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
|
I know, I know -- it's mostly Europe's fault; the above was more of a joke because American's are becoming a bunch of pudgy fat-asses. I'll put the blame on the French (just because I can)!
__________________
The Original USMCsilver© ~~><~~
|
10 December 2007, 10:54 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
YES, I WILL BLAME THE FRENCH ALSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn French!!!!!
(Because I am here in Phnom Penh and I just got back from a French Restuarant where I gourged myself with some of the best French Food and Wine have ever had!!!!!! Man, those French know how to cook!!!) |
10 December 2007, 11:31 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
Quote:
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
|
10 December 2007, 11:35 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
|
I think those with XL watches are compensating. For what I don't know.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
10 December 2007, 11:37 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
That is why I am buying a 34mm Air King.
|
11 December 2007, 12:06 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
Most of the guys I see wearing big blingy watches are very young 20's. Rappers, Professional athletes, etc. They also might have pants half hanging off there arse! No disrespect to Paneri owners! I,m quite content with 40mm!
|
11 December 2007, 12:12 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: az
Posts: 283
|
40 mm is big enough
|
11 December 2007, 12:29 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,001
|
Even though the watches are all going huge and in some cases you have no choice in size for a particular model, I think it should depend on what looks best for your wrist size. A 300lb man with 10" wrist might look better with a 44-48 mm watch on than a 34mm.
I still believe that the huge craze will fade down the line. I am not talking about sport watches that run to 42mm, I think the fad of the 44 to 50 mm will go out of style as the "bling/hip hop" thing fades. Just my 2c |
11 December 2007, 12:45 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
Yes!!!!!
Quote:
I hope so...I will made me very glad I hate those fat bling bling things people are wearing and SHOWING around in the street... I hope those "things" and this trend became "ugh"... and I hope people go back to the more elegance watch style as before. No more big, bling and orange watches on the men AND lady watches. I finally find someone (really hard to find people at my age these days - beside my girl friend and my family) that understands that waches are not for showing on the street and "the bigger the better, the more bling the better". I miss perfect style!
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
|
11 December 2007, 01:05 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
Even within Rolex, the new models have larger bezels. Take the new GMT IIc, it definitely looks bigger than the other 40 mm models. This will probaby carry over to the other models when they get updated. I think it is the trend nowadays, prob. started by rap stars and celebs..
|
11 December 2007, 01:17 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Euro
Posts: 522
|
The GMT looks much better on your wrist...
__________________
Time is one of our greatest endeavour.... |
11 December 2007, 01:29 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Watch: Pepsi,LV,SSDJ
Posts: 343
|
40 mm is my limit.
I think the big watch craze is partly due to a reaction with the electric high tech world, where smaller is better. To have a big analog watch, with an automatic movement kind of brings some comfort to all of the sterile high tech gadgets. Learning how to tell time is a universal form of communication, that we all learn as kids. usually on an analog clock. The big watches we are seeing, brings us back to this experience . Just my two cents, I may be completely |
11 December 2007, 01:50 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 848
|
Guys - why so serious? The reason watches have gotten so much bigger IMO is because men began to discover that a watch does not have to be just a thing on your wrist to tell time. They can be fun!!!
Guys have way fewer options than women as far as dress and appearance. An interesting watch can be a personal accent that says something about us. Wearing a big blingy watch does not always mean the guy is an a-hole trying to show off. Maybe he just enjoys wearing it, looking at it and enjoying it. Just look at this board. A bunch of really great guys having fun with shared interest in a hobby. I like 36 mm, 40 mm, and 44 mm, and wear them all at different times. For me, this is where the fun is, and no hard and fast rules apply. Cheers, Larry. |
11 December 2007, 02:21 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Watch: Rolex Yacht-Master
Posts: 149
|
Great! My YM midsize is 35 mm...so, that makes me a "boyz-to-men" group! My wrist size is 6-6.25...there is no way a 40mm watch is gonna look right. Even my Omega deville at 37.5 mm look kinda on the edge of big.
Hopefully, for my sake, the trend will go backwards to girly watches! |
11 December 2007, 02:46 AM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Don
Location: Leawood, KS
Watch: Zenith Defy Open
Posts: 38
|
Big Watches
Quote:
I am 61 Y.O. and have, and also wear on a regular basis, watches from 36mm (Vintage Rolex) to 50mm (Bell and Ross Br01-97) with a few in between. |
|
11 December 2007, 03:07 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
|
IMHO, big watches look better...at least on me. Most of my watches are in the 40-42mm range. I do have a couple of larger watches (Glycine KMU 48 and Citizen Ecozilla) that I wear as "beater" watches. The Ecozilla is bigger, but the Glycine looks bigger because it is all dial (no bezel).
I'd love to have a Datejust, but I just can't get over the 36mm case size. My wrist is between 7 3/4" and 8" and the DJ looks like a ladies watch on my wrist (IMO). I figured instead of the DJ, I'd pick up the Aqua Terra (42mm) sometime down the line. Of course, I'm currently saving for a PAM 177 or 88, so take my input with a grain of salt...
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial) |
11 December 2007, 03:54 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 848
|
|
11 December 2007, 02:58 AM | #29 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
11 December 2007, 03:19 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
I like big ones too.
Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.