ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gatt · 9 March 2013, 08:33 PM

http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7

Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well.
Thanks for any help.

Mark020 · 9 March 2013, 11:51 PM

Serial is 2.3 so no 1960 but later. And no PCG as well.

violetman · 10 March 2013, 12:00 AM

not pointed crown guards , not gilt dial as well

springer · 10 March 2013, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gatt

http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7

Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well.
Thanks for any help.

The 9315 bracelet would be an appropriate bracelet for a late 1960's Submariner. The 93150 bracelet was released during the mid-1970's which would not be original for this watch. From my experience, you will see many early Subs wearing the 93150 bracelet. It does not seem to be a major issue with collectors due to the value of both bracelets being relatively the same if in average to above average condition - although a period correct 9315 bracelet in excellent condition for a specific Submariner will usually be a couple hundred dollars more than a comparable 93150 bracelet.

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 01:57 AM

My 5513 is 2.4 million and it's a 1969 if that helps .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 01:59 AM

He has it listed as a 1969 now not 1960 . Did it get changed ? They didn't have pointed crown guards then . It was one of the first ft first dials.

Mike B , Canada ⌚

turpe · 10 March 2013, 02:38 AM

Maybe the original listing said 'Late 60' when he meant 'Late 60s'?

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 03:01 AM

I don't know but in 69 no pointed guards ft first started and guilt dials where long done. Here is a picture of mine . All correct .

you be the judge .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

Gatt · 10 March 2013, 04:51 AM

My fault: I wrote late '60 instead of late 60s. Yes, it is listed as 1969.

The seller confirmed, with some roughness of manners, the wrong bracelet type.

MichaelB_Can · 10 March 2013, 04:57 AM

It should be a folded link bracelet 9315 with 280 endlinks I believe , if you get it I'm sure you could sell the bracelet and get a 9315 or maybe trade for 1. I personally don't think it's that big of a deal . You see so many now with no bracelet on a nato for sale .
But that bezel dot is so white it would drive me crazy . I'd try to find an older one. But that's just me .

Mike B , Canada ⌚

9 March 2013, 08:33 PM	#1
Gatt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Italy Posts: 5	Is this a real late '60 5513? http://www.ebay.it/itm/ROLEX-SUBMARI...item23282717c7 Should it have a 9315 bracelet? I cant judge if it has pointed crown guards as well. Thanks for any help.

9 March 2013, 11:51 PM	#2
Mark020 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 2,133	Serial is 2.3 so no 1960 but later. And no PCG as well.

10 March 2013, 12:00 AM	#3
violetman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: HK Posts: 96	not pointed crown guards , not gilt dial as well

10 March 2013, 01:57 AM	#5
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	My 5513 is 2.4 million and it's a 1969 if that helps . Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 01:59 AM	#6
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	He has it listed as a 1969 now not 1960 . Did it get changed ? They didn't have pointed crown guards then . It was one of the first ft first dials. Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 02:38 AM	#7
turpe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: California Watch: JLC MasterCalendar Posts: 113	Maybe the original listing said 'Late 60' when he meant 'Late 60s'?

10 March 2013, 03:01 AM	#8
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	I don't know but in 69 no pointed guards ft first started and guilt dials where long done. Here is a picture of mine . All correct . you be the judge . Mike B , Canada ⌚

10 March 2013, 04:51 AM	#9
Gatt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Italy Posts: 5	My fault: I wrote late '60 instead of late 60s. Yes, it is listed as 1969. The seller confirmed, with some roughness of manners, the wrong bracelet type.

10 March 2013, 04:57 AM	#10
MichaelB_Can Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 332	It should be a folded link bracelet 9315 with 280 endlinks I believe , if you get it I'm sure you could sell the bracelet and get a 9315 or maybe trade for 1. I personally don't think it's that big of a deal . You see so many now with no bracelet on a nato for sale . But that bezel dot is so white it would drive me crazy . I'd try to find an older one. But that's just me . Mike B , Canada ⌚

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)