ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Crsturmer1 · 10 March 2013, 07:39 PM

Hi all,
Did a quick search but couldn't find this info. Apologies if I missed it.
Just wondered whether the AR coating on my 116610LN cyclops is on the inside of the crystal, between the crystal and the cyclops or external?
Thanks for the advice,
Chris

kilyung · 10 March 2013, 07:41 PM

Under the crystal is my understanding.

crowncollection · 10 March 2013, 08:25 PM

Under

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cop414 · 10 March 2013, 09:52 PM

I would think that if it was on top you'd have reports of it scratching, yes?
I assume it's under.

Bangel · 10 March 2013, 10:16 PM

My understanding is that it's under the crystal also.

I recall seeing a picture of one (may have been a GMT IIc) with the cyclops removed. There remained an anti reflective area under the crystal where the cyclops had been.

The Prodigy · 10 March 2013, 11:04 PM

But the cyclops itself is not (!!) under the crystal. It's on top of the crystal.

gpfps · 10 March 2013, 10:12 PM

Can you tell the diff. My son's subc and my DD next to each other one is not clearer to my old eyes . Any one else can't tell?

watchf · 10 March 2013, 11:13 PM

Have a read of this link (scroll down to the bottom with pictures). It seems to say the AR coating is both under and above.

http://www.minus4plus6.com/116710.htm

Grey.Coupe · 10 March 2013, 11:23 PM

Wonder why they didn't do the whole crystal??

Crsturmer1 · 11 March 2013, 12:07 AM

Interesting picture watchf. Thanks! I'm just wondering whether I need to be careful not to scratch the top of the cyclops because of the AR and it looks like there is a coating there.

The AR coating is what makes the cyclops IMO. My eye is always drawn to the date when looking at the face of the watch because it's so sharp and unreflective.

watchf · 11 March 2013, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crsturmer1

Interesting picture watchf. Thanks! I'm just wondering whether I need to be careful not to scratch the top of the cyclops because of the AR and it looks like there is a coating there.

The AR coating is what makes the cyclops IMO. My eye is always drawn to the date when looking at the face of the watch because it's so sharp and unreflective.

If its above and below I presume it means on the crystal but under the cyclop and below the crystal on the underside of it.

10 March 2013, 07:39 PM	#1
Crsturmer1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Uk Posts: 4	AR cyclops coating internal or external? Hi all, Did a quick search but couldn't find this info. Apologies if I missed it. Just wondered whether the AR coating on my 116610LN cyclops is on the inside of the crystal, between the crystal and the cyclops or external? Thanks for the advice, Chris

10 March 2013, 08:25 PM	#3
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Under Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

10 March 2013, 09:52 PM	#4
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,234	I would think that if it was on top you'd have reports of it scratching, yes? I assume it's under. __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

10 March 2013, 11:13 PM	#8
watchf "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Australia Posts: 2,458	Have a read of this link (scroll down to the bottom with pictures). It seems to say the AR coating is both under and above. http://www.minus4plus6.com/116710.htm Attached Images

10 March 2013, 07:41 PM	#2
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Under the crystal is my understanding.

10 March 2013, 10:16 PM	#5
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	My understanding is that it's under the crystal also. I recall seeing a picture of one (may have been a GMT IIc) with the cyclops removed. There remained an anti reflective area under the crystal where the cyclops had been.

10 March 2013, 11:04 PM	#6
The Prodigy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 55	But the cyclops itself is not (!!) under the crystal. It's on top of the crystal.

10 March 2013, 10:12 PM	#7
gpfps Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: George Location: Detroit Michigan Watch: 18078 Posts: 1,142	Can you tell the diff. My son's subc and my DD next to each other one is not clearer to my old eyes . Any one else can't tell?

10 March 2013, 11:23 PM	#9
Grey.Coupe "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NC, USA Posts: 555	Wonder why they didn't do the whole crystal??

11 March 2013, 12:07 AM	#10
Crsturmer1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Uk Posts: 4	Interesting picture watchf. Thanks! I'm just wondering whether I need to be careful not to scratch the top of the cyclops because of the AR and it looks like there is a coating there. The AR coating is what makes the cyclops IMO. My eye is always drawn to the date when looking at the face of the watch because it's so sharp and unreflective.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)