ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
31 March 2013, 06:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hampshire uk
Posts: 3
|
Noob with Explorer 6610 and lots of questions
Hi, i have an Explorer 6610 which i inherited from my dear old dad.
Before you all groan, i have read the post on noobs wanting valuations and thats not what im after. The sentimental value to me far outweighs any monetry value and yes i have an idea of its worth. Down to the nitty gritty. The serial no is 2000xx which i estimate to be around 1956 1957. The dial was changed by Rolex in 1975, question is what dial did they replace the original with? Ive seen a few pics of a 57 Explorer with white font but not with the "T SWISS T" at the bottom. How hard would it be to source an original dial and what type of dial would it be. Now i know that when the watch came back from Rolex, dad wasnt impressed with the new dial (the old one had a stain IIRC somewhere near the centre), and i am not sure exactly why, might have been because the font was in white instead of gold or it might have been because the original dial was white and not black. The hands are gold around the edges, does that indicate they are gilt? should it have a gilt dial? Possible clues as to the original dial might be in the estimate that Rolex did before completeing the work. There is a description of the watch, which is Gents s.s Rolex oyster perp. Explorer sooc cs lum bd on s.s f.f exp 6636 5/7 link bracelet What does the "sooc cs lum bd" bit mean? The "s" in sooc has be over typed and may not be an "s" At the end of the day i have supporting paperwork to say that the dial has been changed, i.e its not fake, so should i leave it or change it, whats your opinions? Is it too late after 38 years to complain to Rolex? Also there is a scratch on the crystal, advice please on the best way of polishing it out. This watch is worn very rarely and spends most of its time in its box in the safe, (the box isnt the correct one, i purchased it to keep the watch in instead of leaving it loose in the sock drawer) am i doing it any harm by leaving it resting then just using it for a day once every few months? Im about to try and upload pics, i apologise for the quality. |
31 March 2013, 09:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: California
Watch: JLC MasterCalendar
Posts: 113
|
Can't tell you much about the dial/case stuff - but I can tell you that PolyWatch and a microfiber cloth will work wonders on that crystal.
|
31 March 2013, 09:43 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
Welcome to the forum. You have a great classic watch - rare in these days.
My best advice is to have it serviced - the lubricants have surely evaporated/degraded since 1975. You will get a new crystal in the work order. And if you send RSC a copy of your old paperwork they can decode the hieroglyphics. As you asked what harm might come from wearing it - the parts inside are likely grinding themselves more than should be allowed.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
1 April 2013, 04:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hampshire uk
Posts: 3
|
Thanks for the help, one tube of Polywatch has been ordered, and a ill send a copy of the invoice off to RSC in kent.
Ill keep it rested for the time being, untill i can find an independant to service it. From what i can gather RCS are not sympathetic towards vintage. |
1 April 2013, 06:55 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
Quote:
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
|
1 April 2013, 05:41 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Even with the service dial, it's a drool-worthy piece!
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
1 April 2013, 06:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hampshire uk
Posts: 3
|
|
1 April 2013, 06:54 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.