ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TheVTCGuy · 24 April 2013, 11:26 PM

SO.... Basically, we have a Daytona with an..... "interesting" color choice and a new metal (Platinum). I am very suprised at this... I expected the only all-platty to remain the signature Rolex, the President, but think a platty Daytona might be a good idea for another (very) high-end model in that metal. Not for me, for that kind of money I would go with a Pres or a Sky-Dweller, or maybe a Patek, but if you like it then I hope you get one soon.

The thing I find unusual is the color choice.... Like the Day-Date, I think an all-Platty watch should be attractive but subtle, not scream out with a controversial color. There are other ways to differentiate it from the SS model (like they do with the WG). But, Just IMHO.

The SS YM was also a big surprise.... Is Rolex trying to increase the sales by opening it up to us more common folk? And on this particular model it is hard to believe. This is Rolex's most specific targeted model, with the 10 minute counter for yaght-racing. The GMT is supposed to be for pilots, but many people have a use for a second time zone. The Daytona, for race-car drivers, but lot's of uses for a stop-watch. But the YM?

What other activities do you use a count-down 10 minute timer? I submit very few. So, the specific target demography of this model is either a yacht-owner, or someone involved in the sport of yacht-racing; typically an opulent sport with wealthy members. Why introduce the SS?

The GMT-Blue. Very "interesting" as well. I actually like it, but if they proved they can do the bezel color thing, why not the tried and true Pepsi/Coke that has become so Iconic? The Red and black (or blue) also actually served a purpose, the idea being red being daylight hours and black night... So... is the Blue for the blue sky that shows during daylight?

Finally, no NEW models.... like (I was hoping for) a 42 model in the GMT ? They have the movement, the case, only thing that would have been necessary to manufacturer was a bezel, but how hard could that have been?

All in all, there were some very interesting (read confusing) releases, but nothing really new.

Just my

psv · 24 April 2013, 11:27 PM

There was no news. Releasing the same model in a different color combo or metal isn't news, barely an update.

I think it is cool they brought back the Stellas but overall I'm underwhelmed. Yet again.

cop414 · 25 April 2013, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

There was no news. Releasing the same model in a different color combo or metal isn't news, barely an update.

I think it is cool they brought back the Stellas but overall I'm underwhelmed. Yet again.

I have to agree with you Patrick, I'm somewhat disappointed too.

psv · 24 April 2013, 11:28 PM

When was the last time Rolex released something interesting? 2008 with the DSSD?

FremStar · 24 April 2013, 11:34 PM

Nice write up! Not disappointed actually quite excited with what Tudor has done and the SS YM2!

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

When was the last time Rolex released something interesting? 2008 with the DSSD?

I thought the Sky-Dweller was pretty interesting! First Annual Calandar from Rolex seemed like ground breaking news to me!

mjclark32 · 24 April 2013, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FremStar

Nice write up! Not disappointed actually quite excited with what Tudor has done and the SS YM2!

I thought the Sky-Dweller was pretty interesting! First Annual Calandar from Rolex seemed like ground breaking news to me!

Agreed

psv · 24 April 2013, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FremStar

Nice write up! Not disappointed actually quite excited with what Tudor has done and the SS YM2!

I thought the Sky-Dweller was pretty interesting! First Annual Calandar from Rolex seemed like ground breaking news to me!

Sam, I have to agree with that one, forgot about it. I just wish they had a stainless steel version of it already.

Duc5150 · 24 April 2013, 11:36 PM

No 42mm Daytona II........

Todd B. in the OC

Dr. Robert · 25 April 2013, 04:20 AM

They didn't bring lug holes back

bscepter · 25 April 2013, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

When was the last time Rolex released something interesting? 2008 with the DSSD?

skydweller last year. very interesting.

mjclark32 · 24 April 2013, 11:36 PM

I like the introduction of the YMII in SS, I don't own a yacht (or a boat for that matter) but I can use it to start the countdown on my wife while she gets ready

I have a sub, but I've never been diving...
I'm not overwhelmed with what ROlex put out this year, but I'm happy overall.

padi56 · 24 April 2013, 11:39 PM

Well lets be honest not much from Rolex over the last 15 plus years to get really excited about.There own chrono movement ever 2000 some very minor updates on models and the YM11, over rated expencive ceramic inserts DSSD PLUS Skydweller. And with this years quite disappointing effort so no real big surprise to myself.All we got few new dial colours ,metal options on a few models,some models available now on straps, and a bi colour ceramic insert WOW.

kilyung · 24 April 2013, 11:39 PM

I'm holding judgement on the Pt950 Daytona until I can see it. My glacier blue dial is more often a pale green than blue so it may not look as bad as it looks in pics.

I love the SS YMII. What's it good for? I don't know... grilling steaks or timing sex?

Roller07 · 24 April 2013, 11:48 PM

Not surprised at all.

JP Chestnut · 24 April 2013, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I'm holding judgement on the Pt950 Daytona until I can see it. My glacier blue dial is more often a pale green than blue so it may not look as bad as it looks in pics.

I love the SS YMII. What's it good for? I don't know... grilling steaks or timing sex?

I think most aspire to last more than 10 minutes!

boogiebot · 25 April 2013, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I

I love the SS YMII. What's it good for? I don't know... grilling steaks or timing sex?

Ravager135 · 24 April 2013, 11:51 PM

I think it's really cool that they finally put the YMII in SS. I wouldn't say you need to be rich to sail. I have plenty of middle income friends who sail and participate in regattas who might buy this piece. Sailing Sunfish or Lazers isn't that expensive. I think it was a good choice on Rolex's part.

The new GMTIIC I am kind of disappointed about. Not going to lie. The blue is just completely out of place. I am sure it will sell and people will buy it, but I think I might just go ahead and pick up a green GMT. Atleast green is the Rolex corporate color and makes some sense. All this new model tells me is that Rolex is not going back to the Coke or Pepsi color scheme any time soon.

Frogman4me · 24 April 2013, 11:52 PM

Me personally I don't like the idea of rolex going bigger in size. I am pleased with Tudor, day dates and the GMT :)

landroverking · 25 April 2013, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frogman4me

Me personally I don't like the idea of rolex going bigger in size. I am pleased with Tudor, day dates and the GMT :)

X2. Rolex Knows we don't need bigger watches.

FremStar · 25 April 2013, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Well lets be honest not much from Rolex over the last 15 plus years to get really excited about.There own chrono movement ever 2000 some very minor updates on models and the YM11, over rated expencive ceramic inserts DSSD PLUS Skydweller. And with this years quite disappointing effort so no real big surprise to myself.All we got few new dial colours ,metal options on a few models,some models available now on straps, and a bi colour ceramic insert WOW.

Always interesting reading your comments...

I personally feel this is a nice progression for the company...

From here...

To here...

How can one not get excited? Or better yet see the progression?

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

Sam, I have to agree with that one, forgot about it. I just wish they had a stainless steel version of it already.

;-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frogman4me

Me personally I don't like the idea of rolex going bigger in size. I am pleased with Tudor, day dates and the GMT :)

;-)

Love what Tudor has done with the new THC!

MP5 · 25 April 2013, 12:57 AM

Love you Sam but if you gave me the choice I'd enthusiastically take either explorer if it was a gift, meaning it would be improper to sell. If not I wouldn't even turn the bezel on the Sky Dweller before selling it and buying those explorers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FremStar

Always interesting reading your comments...

I personally feel this is a nice progression for the company...

From here...

To here...

How can one not get excited? Or better yet see the progression?

;-)

;-)

Love what Tudor has done with the new THC!

FremStar · 25 April 2013, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MP5

Love you Sam but if you gave me the choice I'd enthusiastically take either explorer if it was a gift, meaning it would be improper to sell. If not I wouldn't even turn the bezel on the Sky Dweller before selling it and buying those explorers.

Totally agree with you sir! As you are aware I own a 1655, I am all for vintage, however, happy to see the company think outside the box! Trust me when I say the chase and hunt for the proper vintage far supersedes the modern stuff I post here on TRF ;-)

Here are some Easter bunnies for you!

Be well my friend!

mruhland31 · 24 April 2013, 11:56 PM

Just my two cents...I kind of like that Rolex doesn't make a lot of changes...new models..etc. My reasoning is pretty simple. To me it states confidence, it says something to me about the brand that they aren't trying to keep up with other watch companies that are always chasing new fads. I totally get why there is a desire from Rolex fans for change but to me the fact that the change comes slowly speaks to the old school and I like it...IMHO

Wllnv19 · 25 April 2013, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mruhland31

Just my two cents...I kind of like that Rolex doesn't make a lot of changes...new models..etc. My reasoning is pretty simple. To me it states confidence, it says something to me about the brand that they aren't trying to keep up with other watch companies that are always chasing new fads. I totally get why there is a desire from Rolex fans for change but to me the fact that the change comes slowly speaks to the old school and I like it...IMHO

Agree!

cedargrove · 25 April 2013, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mruhland31

I kind of like that Rolex doesn't make a lot of changes...new models..etc. My reasoning is pretty simple. To me it states confidence, it says something to me about the brand that they aren't trying to keep up with other watch companies that are always chasing new fads. I totally get why there is a desire from Rolex fans for change but to me the fact that the change comes slowly speaks to the old school and I like it...IMHO

Me too. They remain relevant, without chasing every fad. Timeless.

beshannon · 24 April 2013, 11:58 PM

Neither suprised nor disappointed

I have learned over the years that this is one of the most anti-climactic events I bother to pay attention to

Kanger · 25 April 2013, 12:21 AM

I am overjoyed! 40 is perfect to me, thank you for staying above the trend Rolex!

dukerules · 25 April 2013, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kanger

I am overjoyed! 40 is perfect to me, thank you for staying above the trend Rolex!

Agree, not releasing more upsized models is pretty much progression these days.

bscepter · 25 April 2013, 12:28 AM

just say no to big watches! 40mm is plenty big!

Duc5150 · 25 April 2013, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bscepter

just say no to big watches! 40mm is plenty big!

Not asking for a wall clock strapped to my wrist....just a lousy +2mm for the bigger wrist folks out there...

.......and to the naysayers +2mm in case size doesn't throw balance of dial or movement or whatever off....my $.02

Todd B. in the OC

24 April 2013, 11:26 PM	#1
TheVTCGuy Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Paul Location: San Diego Watch: 126619LB Posts: 21,540	Anyone else suprised/dissapointed no "new" models? No 42s? SO.... Basically, we have a Daytona with an..... "interesting" color choice and a new metal (Platinum). I am very suprised at this... I expected the only all-platty to remain the signature Rolex, the President, but think a platty Daytona might be a good idea for another (very) high-end model in that metal. Not for me, for that kind of money I would go with a Pres or a Sky-Dweller, or maybe a Patek, but if you like it then I hope you get one soon. The thing I find unusual is the color choice.... Like the Day-Date, I think an all-Platty watch should be attractive but subtle, not scream out with a controversial color. There are other ways to differentiate it from the SS model (like they do with the WG). But, Just IMHO. The SS YM was also a big surprise.... Is Rolex trying to increase the sales by opening it up to us more common folk? And on this particular model it is hard to believe. This is Rolex's most specific targeted model, with the 10 minute counter for yaght-racing. The GMT is supposed to be for pilots, but many people have a use for a second time zone. The Daytona, for race-car drivers, but lot's of uses for a stop-watch. But the YM? What other activities do you use a count-down 10 minute timer? I submit very few. So, the specific target demography of this model is either a yacht-owner, or someone involved in the sport of yacht-racing; typically an opulent sport with wealthy members. Why introduce the SS? The GMT-Blue. Very "interesting" as well. I actually like it, but if they proved they can do the bezel color thing, why not the tried and true Pepsi/Coke that has become so Iconic? The Red and black (or blue) also actually served a purpose, the idea being red being daylight hours and black night... So... is the Blue for the blue sky that shows during daylight? Finally, no NEW models.... like (I was hoping for) a 42 model in the GMT ? They have the movement, the case, only thing that would have been necessary to manufacturer was a bezel, but how hard could that have been? All in all, there were some very interesting (read confusing) releases, but nothing really new. Just my

25 April 2013, 04:20 AM	#9
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,277	They didn't bring lug holes back __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

24 April 2013, 11:36 PM	#11
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I like the introduction of the YMII in SS, I don't own a yacht (or a boat for that matter) but I can use it to start the countdown on my wife while she gets ready I have a sub, but I've never been diving... I'm not overwhelmed with what ROlex put out this year, but I'm happy overall. __________________

24 April 2013, 11:39 PM	#12
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,063	Well lets be honest not much from Rolex over the last 15 plus years to get really excited about.There own chrono movement ever 2000 some very minor updates on models and the YM11, over rated expencive ceramic inserts DSSD PLUS Skydweller. And with this years quite disappointing effort so no real big surprise to myself.All we got few new dial colours ,metal options on a few models,some models available now on straps, and a bi colour ceramic insert WOW. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

24 April 2013, 11:58 PM	#26
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	Neither suprised nor disappointed I have learned over the years that this is one of the most anti-climactic events I bother to pay attention to __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

24 April 2013, 11:27 PM	#2
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	There was no news. Releasing the same model in a different color combo or metal isn't news, barely an update. I think it is cool they brought back the Stellas but overall I'm underwhelmed. Yet again.

24 April 2013, 11:28 PM	#4
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	When was the last time Rolex released something interesting? 2008 with the DSSD?

24 April 2013, 11:36 PM	#8
Duc5150 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: TB Location: West Coast Posts: 339	No 42mm Daytona II........ Todd B. in the OC

24 April 2013, 11:39 PM	#13
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	I'm holding judgement on the Pt950 Daytona until I can see it. My glacier blue dial is more often a pale green than blue so it may not look as bad as it looks in pics. I love the SS YMII. What's it good for? I don't know... grilling steaks or timing sex?

24 April 2013, 11:48 PM	#14
Roller07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: GMT -5 Watch: HulkPepsiCoke Posts: 2,364	Not surprised at all.

24 April 2013, 11:51 PM	#17
Ravager135 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: New Jersey Posts: 4,224	I think it's really cool that they finally put the YMII in SS. I wouldn't say you need to be rich to sail. I have plenty of middle income friends who sail and participate in regattas who might buy this piece. Sailing Sunfish or Lazers isn't that expensive. I think it was a good choice on Rolex's part. The new GMTIIC I am kind of disappointed about. Not going to lie. The blue is just completely out of place. I am sure it will sell and people will buy it, but I think I might just go ahead and pick up a green GMT. Atleast green is the Rolex corporate color and makes some sense. All this new model tells me is that Rolex is not going back to the Coke or Pepsi color scheme any time soon.

24 April 2013, 11:52 PM	#18
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	Me personally I don't like the idea of rolex going bigger in size. I am pleased with Tudor, day dates and the GMT :)

24 April 2013, 11:56 PM	#23
mruhland31 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Santa Clarita CA Posts: 1,028	Just my two cents...I kind of like that Rolex doesn't make a lot of changes...new models..etc. My reasoning is pretty simple. To me it states confidence, it says something to me about the brand that they aren't trying to keep up with other watch companies that are always chasing new fads. I totally get why there is a desire from Rolex fans for change but to me the fact that the change comes slowly speaks to the old school and I like it...IMHO

25 April 2013, 12:21 AM	#27
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	I am overjoyed! 40 is perfect to me, thank you for staying above the trend Rolex!

25 April 2013, 12:28 AM	#29
bscepter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Patrick Location: Omaha Watch: 16610 Submariner Posts: 948	just say no to big watches! 40mm is plenty big! __________________ 2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)