The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 July 2013, 07:45 AM   #1
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
So explain to me the price diffs between 372 and 422

MSRP 372 $10,400
MSRP 422 $11,200

Both have a quantity of 2,000 units/year, the 372 has obviously been out a year longer. The additional $800 gets you a small second hand, PR indicator and a sapphire crystal.

Now the used prices for a mint 372 is $7,250-$7,600 but the 422 seems to land around $9,800?!

Can someone please explain this to me?
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:47 AM   #2
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
It all comes down to what people will pay, but the 422 would seem to be the better value?
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:51 AM   #3
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
The 422 is still relatively new (O + P serials) whereas the 372 has been out since N serials. I thought the 372 was 3500 units per serial?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 08:59 AM   #4
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
The 422 is still relatively new (O + P serials) whereas the 372 has been out since N serials. I thought the 372 was 3500 units per serial?
True Mike, now that you say it, 3,5000 units/year for the 372.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:19 AM   #5
PanosI
2024 Pledge Member
 
PanosI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
372 is 3500 units for N series, 2500 units for O series and 3000 units for the current P series.
PanosI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:57 AM   #6
MP5
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
Is there no additional cosc involved with the ss hand? Like the historics?
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 07:58 AM   #7
Friedl41
"TRF" Member
 
Friedl41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
I think a lot of people bought a 372 to make money and not because they wanted to wear it ... The daytona effect. They hoped the model would be discontinued and a buck could be made .... Now it did not happen and these people are now selling ... The 422 is younger and was never so much a watch for speculation and profit hunters... IMHO
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m
SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980)
GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570
PP 5065a
Friedl41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:00 AM   #8
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friedl41 View Post
I think a lot of people bought a 372 to make money and not because they wanted to wear it ... The daytona effect. They hoped the model would be discontinued and a buck could be made .... Now it did not happen and these people are now selling ... The 422 is younger and was never so much a watch for speculation and profit hunters... IMHO
Got a point here...

Still, love both models, not sure the 422 is worth $2K-$2.5K extra at this point though.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:56 AM   #9
Survivor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friedl41 View Post
I think a lot of people bought a 372 to make money and not because they wanted to wear it ... The daytona effect. They hoped the model would be discontinued and a buck could be made .... Now it did not happen and these people are now selling ... The 422 is younger and was never so much a watch for speculation and profit hunters... IMHO
Couldn't have said it better......not really all that difficult to figure out why..
Survivor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 03:48 AM   #10
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Survivor View Post
Couldn't have said it better......not really all that difficult to figure out why..
Well, that could perhaps explain the first thousand batch of watches, not those buying 2nd or 3rd year of production...
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 08:07 AM   #11
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
Not sure Patrick....both nice IMHO. The 372 more tied to vintage 6152-1 look to me and thus more my style. I like the 422 as well but for the money 372 it is.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 08:47 AM   #12
nishant
"TRF" Member
 
nishant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
Wait another year and 422 would be around 8K ... Just the way it goes !! It is already going down to 9k or so ...
nishant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:01 AM   #13
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by nishant View Post
Wait another year and 422 would be around 8K ... Just the way it goes !! It is already going down to 9k or so ...
Nishant - is that a new watch on your avatar? :-)
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:17 AM   #14
nishant
"TRF" Member
 
nishant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Nishant - is that a new watch on your avatar? :-)
Nope .. It's the watch I am lusting for these days. 307 ... Not quite sure if its the one for me but for now, the saving and my predicament continues !
nishant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:49 AM   #15
TAKUYA
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
TAKUYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 53,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by nishant View Post
Wait another year and 422 would be around 8K ... Just the way it goes !! It is already going down to 9k or so ...
You never really know. The market is crazy. If they stop making it next year, so is it still $9k? Or the new models don't look nice/appeal to Pam's Fans. Then it's gonna go up again as 372. Last year, 372's price market is lower than this year after the Pam's fans wanna go to the historic looking watch and don't care much how big it is these days! and same as 233 dot dial model has the same value as the new am/pm 233 dial??? How come? you will never know
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active

Instagram @takuyawatches
TAKUYA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 09:51 AM   #16
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
422 prices will surely drop a bit with time.
I believe it's just a matter of the 372 being out a year longer.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 02:49 PM   #17
mborkow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
422 has two additional complications and the sapphire crystal must cost more than the plexiglas so the higher price seems justified to me (if you are interested in those features)
mborkow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 06:56 PM   #18
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
nothing against the 372, i really like it, and am totally convinced especially thanks to mike's photo thread. but, as for "value", it's a niche watch....big, two hands, manual, plexi. there probably are too many out there to maintain a high value, but, it's still doing well, and everyone who wants one can get one, so, that's great. we can't have it both ways with panerai, it seems. but, that all being said, we are not in omega or breitling depreciation territory, either.

the 422 has a couple details that make it more of a generalist (sapphire, power reserve indicator, seconds hand) and it's newer, so, it seems to be holding its value better....for now.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2013, 10:42 PM   #19
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
nothing against the 372, i really like it, and am totally convinced especially thanks to mike's photo thread. but, as for "value", it's a niche watch....big, two hands, manual, plexi. there probably are too many out there to maintain a high value, but, it's still doing well, and everyone who wants one can get one, so, that's great. we can't have it both ways with panerai, it seems. but, that all being said, we are not in omega or breitling depreciation territory, either.

the 422 has a couple details that make it more of a generalist (sapphire, power reserve indicator, seconds hand) and it's newer, so, it seems to be holding its value better....for now.
Agree with this. I can't help but think that there will be continued downward price pressure on the secondary market for the 372 if they keep producing at these levels.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 01:25 AM   #20
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvo300 View Post
I can't help but think that there will be continued downward price pressure on the secondary market for the 372 if they keep producing at these levels.
You can make the same argument about any current model but I don't see 312 prices dropping further despite many new 1950 in-house models now out. I'd guess used 372s are probably stable in the low $7s by now. 422s still have a ways to drop IMO.

However 127 prices seem to be lagging. Maybe due to easing of demand due to 372/422 purchases or perhaps speculation (really 'when' not 'if' IMO) that Panerai will release an in-house version.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:05 AM   #21
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
You can make the same argument about any current model but I don't see 312 prices dropping further despite many new 1950 in-house models now out. I'd guess used 372s are probably stable in the low $7s by now. 422s still have a ways to drop IMO.

However 127 prices seem to be lagging. Maybe due to easing of demand due to 372/422 purchases or perhaps speculation (really 'when' not 'if' IMO) that Panerai will release an in-house version.
A fair argument, but I think that overall demand for the 312 should be stronger given that it is a more wearable size for most and at a lower price point. Also, the broader watch buying market probably leans more toward automatics, more complication, and sapphire crystal -- all to the 312 favor and highlighting the niche nature of the 372.

I don't have a crystal ball, but just imagine if Panerai offers a 44mm equivalent at an upcoming SIHH. Of course, it won't be true to the vintage Panerais, but I imagine there would be more than a few 372 owners who would switch due to the size. Just my 2 cents. As always, the most important thing is to get what you want!
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:03 AM   #22
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Look at the diff between a 5711 and a 5712 patek!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 07:04 AM   #23
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Look at the diff between a 5711 and a 5712 patek!
Are you talking new or used?

They are surprisingly different, aside from the complications, they also have different movements.
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 09:46 AM   #24
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Are you talking new or used?

They are surprisingly different, aside from the complications, they also have different movements.
You get a moonphase and a PR was my point. How many more thousand???

422, you get a second hand and a PR.

I see your point on used however.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 10:37 AM   #25
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
You get a moonphase and a PR was my point. How many more thousand???

422, you get a second hand and a PR.

I see your point on used however.
Sorry to veer off topic...

Also have to consider the movements, the

5712/240 : has a micro rotor & seems to be a finer movement?

vs

5711/324

But what i was curious about was do you think there is a similar disparity in after sales valuation

__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 11:19 AM   #26
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Sorry to veer off topic...

Also have to consider the movements, the

5712/240 : has a micro rotor & seems to be a finer movement?

vs

5711/324

But what i was curious about was do you think there is a similar disparity in after sales valuation

My only point is that the extra money is for 2 additional complications 372v422 and 5711v5712. Basically I really like the 5712 and am ticked it is so much more!
Same as the OP that the 422 is so much more that the 372.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:11 AM   #27
advocatia
Banned
 
advocatia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Andy
Location: Florida USA
Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC
Posts: 868
Here's what is amazing. When you talk about production numbers for Panerai, they remain relatively small globally. So discusssion about there being too many 372's out there makes no sense to me. They are simply available to a smaller market. How many non-Panerai fanatics want a manual wind, faux patinaed, no date, plexiglass watch? Gimme a break. The piece, like the 422 was NEVER held out to be a limited production so those who bought on speculation paid the price.

Panerai is also at a price point where they will hard pressed to continue to raise their prices as Rolex does. Rolex makes thousands more of every model each year. Panerai in comparison is a cup of water in a swimming pool.

I am not at all pleased with the drop in price for my 422 as I paid full retail to have one of the first out there. I love the watch and have no intention of getting rid of it but if I did or had to, I doubt I will ever break even on my purchase. The one thing I will say for Rolex is that they hold their value on most models (sports) very, very well.

To stay on topic, I think the 422 is a better choice than the 372 and I don't subscribe to the purist chatter about plexi and super simplicity. The 372 is a Paneristi's almost perfect timepiece. The 422 IMHO brings more to the table without sacrificing that beloved DNA. Walk into any Panerai boutique and the giant clock on the wall is a Luminor Marina. That's pure enough for me.

Overall, save for a few very limited pieces, I don't expect Panerai to hold its value well in the future. Oh well. But, you never know.
advocatia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:22 AM   #28
Rodentman
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
I was offered a 423 (MSRP $11,300) BNIB for $9,875 so I took it. I have a 176 so I already have a 2 hand, and I like the PR on the front. I'm not a plexi fan, and I have only myself to please, no one else. I personally never buy a watch with what the resale market may be.
Rodentman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:46 AM   #29
advocatia
Banned
 
advocatia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Andy
Location: Florida USA
Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC
Posts: 868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodentman View Post
I was offered a 423 (MSRP $11,300) BNIB for $9,875 so I took it. I have a 176 so I already have a 2 hand, and I like the PR on the front. I'm not a plexi fan, and I have only myself to please, no one else. I personally never buy a watch with what the resale market may be.
I dont buy for resale value either but you can't say it's not a nice thing to have. Especially when or if you flip.
advocatia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2013, 02:51 AM   #30
Rodentman
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: ACCT CLOSED
Location: -
Posts: 1,497
Yes, I agree I feel pleasure when I look at my "D" SD is likely worth more on the used market than I paid for it.
Rodentman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.