ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TDH · 29 January 2008, 04:12 AM

Maybe some new innovations from Rolex for 2008 and beyond. Anyone out there for a 40+mm SUB?

Tools · 29 January 2008, 04:16 AM

.
How about the new 2008 60mm Explorer II.

Here's the prototype:

SPACE-DWELLER · 29 January 2008, 04:19 AM

Personally, I find the current sport's Rolex size at 40 MM perfect. The YM II is bigger, and IMHO not as elegant on the wrist (at least judging from the wristshots I have seen of it).

SSD · 29 January 2008, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Personally, I find the current sport's Rolex size at 40 MM perfect. The YM II is bigger, and IMHO not as elegant on the wrist (at least judging from the wristshots I have seen of it).

My sentiments exactly. I do not believe I would like even 42mm, and especially would not like to see the Submariner/ SD line changed at all in this respect. I don't care what they ever do with the YMII, because I'll never choose to buy one. The Explorers are also just right, IMO, as is the current YM. Perhaps if there was a different reference introduced that would address the issues of size & weight on the wrist...

We'll see at Basel!

Dan Pierce · 29 January 2008, 05:35 AM

Hope not.

dP

Texsubmariner · 29 January 2008, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

.
How about the new 2008 60mm Explorer II.

Here's the prototype:

f16570 · 29 January 2008, 05:57 AM

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

frostie · 29 January 2008, 05:37 AM

rolex should stick at the 40mm watch models

Joey_V · 29 January 2008, 05:44 AM

Stick with the 40mm....

Texsubmariner · 29 January 2008, 05:50 AM

Same with everyone here. I don't think Rolex should follow fads and gives us bigger Sub/SD/YM/Exp. We'll see in April.

JBat · 29 January 2008, 06:03 AM

40mm is about the limit for my wrists and one of the things that I like about Rolex. I hope they stick to their guns and don't jump on the size bandwagon. Given the changes to the GMT IIc, I suspect they won't, at least not across the board.

29 January 2008, 04:12 AM	#1
TDH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Jay Location: Here n there Watch: Sub Posts: 1,641	2008 and beyond - a new 40+ mm model ... Maybe some new innovations from Rolex for 2008 and beyond. Anyone out there for a 40+mm SUB?

29 January 2008, 04:16 AM	#2
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,514	. How about the new 2008 60mm Explorer II. Here's the prototype: __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

29 January 2008, 04:19 AM	#3
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Personally, I find the current sport's Rolex size at 40 MM perfect. The YM II is bigger, and IMHO not as elegant on the wrist (at least judging from the wristshots I have seen of it). __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

29 January 2008, 05:35 AM	#5
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,215	Hope not. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

29 January 2008, 05:57 AM	#7
f16570 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: F Location: Scotland Watch: Exp II White Face Posts: 4,272	If it ain't broke don't fix it. __________________ Why have what's new when you have what's best. f

29 January 2008, 05:37 AM	#8
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	rolex should stick at the 40mm watch models __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

29 January 2008, 05:44 AM	#9
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	Stick with the 40mm....

29 January 2008, 05:50 AM	#10
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	Same with everyone here. I don't think Rolex should follow fads and gives us bigger Sub/SD/YM/Exp. We'll see in April. __________________ Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series

29 January 2008, 06:03 AM	#11
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	40mm is about the limit for my wrists and one of the things that I like about Rolex. I hope they stick to their guns and don't jump on the size bandwagon. Given the changes to the GMT IIc, I suspect they won't, at least not across the board.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)