ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jjnd08 · 30 October 2013, 07:59 AM

I posted about this a few weeks back, but I wanted to add a poll and a picture. Which of these two would you choose if you were me? I'm also a fan of gold, but not ready for all gold yet.

I'm not a fan of the 116613, even with the new dial. I like the smaller lugs, bezel color, smaller dial markers, and overall look of the classic better.

I have kind of a smaller to medium sized wrist, I'm 28, and my other Rolex is the 116233 white face with gold roman numerals.

Appreciate the votes and comments!

jjnd08 · 30 October 2013, 08:01 AM

Also, I don't want to save for the blue. I really don't want more than one sub.

Racerdj · 2 January 2014, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

Also, I don't want to save for the blue. I really don't want more than one sub.

That's what I said and look what happened. I really enjoy having two subs. My LB is my favorite but was my second purchase.

ben67 · 30 October 2013, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

I like the smaller lugs, bezel color, smaller dial markers, and overall look of the classic better.

Appreciate the votes and comments!

That pretty much rules out the hulk and maybe you should look at the 16610LV for a comparison.

Otherwise if it is from these two only you have already chosen your favourite....

Keith1 · 30 October 2013, 08:04 AM

I would get the 16613 Sub since you are not a fan of the new SubC.

SLS · 30 October 2013, 08:07 AM

With the majority here liking SS over TT, I am guessing the 16613 will get fewer votes....but there is nothing that beats this dial in the sun IMO.

Scott

elcompa · 30 October 2013, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SLS

With the majority here liking SS over TT, I am guessing the 16613 will get fewer votes....but there is nothing that beats this dial in the sun IMO.

Scott

Agreed. Beautiful!!!! She was my first and most loved in 2003. As is true of most relationships, finances were the cause of our ruin. Now its an SS DateJust and hopefully soon a GMT BLNR.

Sam Philip · 30 October 2013, 08:14 AM

Not a fan off TT watches so Hulk for me out of the two given

samsmart · 30 October 2013, 08:19 AM

They are both awesome.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

samsmart · 30 October 2013, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

I posted about this a few weeks back, but I wanted to add a poll and a picture. Which of these two would you choose if you were me? I'm also a fan of gold, but not ready for all gold yet.

I'm not a fan of the 116613, even with the new dial. I like the smaller lugs, bezel color, smaller dial markers, and overall look of the classic better.

I have kind of a smaller to medium sized wrist, I'm 28, and my other Rolex is the 116233 white face with gold roman numerals.

Appreciate the votes and comments!

Are you at Mark Samuels in Frisco?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

jjnd08 · 30 October 2013, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samsmart

Are you at Mark Samuels in Frisco?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

No. I was at Royal Gold and Silver in Irving off of 635.

The Hulk looks awesome against your sleeve. Definitely my favorite against your art.

samsmart · 30 October 2013, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

No. I was at Royal Gold and Silver in Irving off of 635.

The Hulk looks awesome against your sleeve. Definitely my favorite against your art.

Thanks man.

Royal Gold and Silver is a great place. I just sold a very nice 16613 to David Larson at Dallas Gold and Silver on Reeder Road in Dallas. I am sure he will give you a great deal on it if you havent pulled the trigger on one yet. Tell him I sent you!

SWISSAHOLICS · 30 October 2013, 08:34 AM

Bluesy...Hulk does not do it for me

eeh100773 · 30 October 2013, 08:41 AM

C'mon man - you need the LV to go with your ND Irish sippy cup...(sorry, "sippy cup" just came right out...sorry about that)

Trouble15 · 30 October 2013, 08:42 AM

Hulk!!!!

Chris B · 30 October 2013, 09:06 AM

It's a miss-match , 16613 all day long

jolimont · 30 October 2013, 09:23 AM

hulk any day of the week

MROElectric · 30 October 2013, 09:57 AM

Yep, Hulk all day.

kieselguhr · 30 October 2013, 10:02 AM

Between the 2, I prefer the uniform look of the LVc

wmoore · 30 October 2013, 10:08 AM

They are both awesome that's why I got a 16613 slate serti and then recently the hulk. They get equal wrist time, the TT with business casual and the hulk with jeans and tees
Cheers

Piloto · 30 October 2013, 10:05 AM

CWIN · 30 October 2013, 10:09 AM

jedinite · 30 October 2013, 10:48 AM

I have both and prefer the Hulk

Tooomey · 30 October 2013, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjnd08

I posted about this a few weeks back, but I wanted to add a poll and a picture. Which of these two would you choose if you were me? I'm also a fan of gold, but not ready for all gold yet.

I'm not a fan of the 116613, even with the new dial. I like the smaller lugs, bezel color, smaller dial markers, and overall look of the classic better.

I have kind of a smaller to medium sized wrist, I'm 28, and my other Rolex is the 116233 white face with gold roman numerals.

Appreciate the votes and comments!

I'm confused? Why is this even a question? You like smaller lugs and overall look of the Classic?

With that said I vote hulk! Looks better on you IMO.

kilyung · 30 October 2013, 11:43 AM

I like the classic 16613. I got tired of the green bezel although the dial is gorgeous.

jjnd08 · 30 October 2013, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I like the classic 16613. I got tired of the green bezel although the dial is gorgeous.

I think you just nailed it Mike, the bezel gets old, but when the light hits that dial, it's gorgeous!

BNA/LION · 30 October 2013, 11:47 AM

16613 bluesy here...

barad55 · 30 October 2013, 12:12 PM

You're only 28 years old very young.. so my vote is the HULK for more flashy look..
I'm not gonna gonna wear something with gold until I'm in late 40's IMO. and u also mentioned that you already have DJ with gold but its still up to you. GL!

SixPak · 30 October 2013, 12:33 PM

I voted for the 16613 the last time but going for the LVc this time.

jjnd08 · 30 October 2013, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SixPak

I voted for the 16613 the last time but going for the LVc this time.

May I ask why the switch?

View Poll Results: Which one for me?
16613 bluesy	69	38.76%
116610lvc Hulk	109	61.24%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

30 October 2013, 07:59 AM	#1
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	16613 vs The Hulk I posted about this a few weeks back, but I wanted to add a poll and a picture. Which of these two would you choose if you were me? I'm also a fan of gold, but not ready for all gold yet. I'm not a fan of the 116613, even with the new dial. I like the smaller lugs, bezel color, smaller dial markers, and overall look of the classic better. I have kind of a smaller to medium sized wrist, I'm 28, and my other Rolex is the 116233 white face with gold roman numerals. Appreciate the votes and comments! Attached Images

30 October 2013, 08:07 AM	#6
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	With the majority here liking SS over TT, I am guessing the 16613 will get fewer votes....but there is nothing that beats this dial in the sun IMO. Scott Attached Images __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

30 October 2013, 08:19 AM	#9
samsmart "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: sam Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Me Tint Posts: 3,777	They are both awesome. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2 Attached Images

30 October 2013, 08:34 AM	#13
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	Bluesy...Hulk does not do it for me __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

30 October 2013, 08:01 AM	#2
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	Also, I don't want to save for the blue. I really don't want more than one sub.

30 October 2013, 08:04 AM	#5
Keith1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: San Diego Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD Posts: 2,482	I would get the 16613 Sub since you are not a fan of the new SubC.

30 October 2013, 08:14 AM	#8
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	Not a fan off TT watches so Hulk for me out of the two given

30 October 2013, 08:41 AM	#14
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	C'mon man - you need the LV to go with your ND Irish sippy cup...(sorry, "sippy cup" just came right out...sorry about that) __________________ Instagram: @clocksontherocks

30 October 2013, 08:42 AM	#15
Trouble15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Steve Location: USA Watch: A few Posts: 8,883	Hulk!!!!

30 October 2013, 09:06 AM	#16
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,631	It's a miss-match , 16613 all day long

30 October 2013, 09:23 AM	#17
jolimont "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Will Location: land of oz Watch: sundial Posts: 2,219	hulk any day of the week

30 October 2013, 09:57 AM	#18
MROElectric Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Black Mountain Posts: 129	Yep, Hulk all day.

30 October 2013, 10:02 AM	#19
kieselguhr "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Nick Location: Las Vegas Watch: 1601 Posts: 10,623	Between the 2, I prefer the uniform look of the LVc

30 October 2013, 10:08 AM	#20
wmoore "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Wayne Location: Nova Scotia Watch: 116263, 79280 Posts: 255	Choices They are both awesome that's why I got a 16613 slate serti and then recently the hulk. They get equal wrist time, the TT with business casual and the hulk with jeans and tees Cheers

30 October 2013, 10:05 AM	#21
Piloto "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: My overnight bag Watch: 16613 & 116710BLNR Posts: 572

30 October 2013, 10:09 AM	#22
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	__________________ *Instagram* @cwin

30 October 2013, 10:48 AM	#23
jedinite "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: TC Location: GMT -8 Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea Posts: 582	I have both and prefer the Hulk __________________ Tudor Submariner 76100/Rolex TT Submariner Blue X/Victorinox AirBoss Mach 6/Longines Grande Vitesse/Rolex SeaDweller DeepSea V/ GShock GW-3000B/ Tudor Prince Date 74034/ Rolex ExII 42 WD/ Rolex Submariner 116610 LV/ Tudor Pelagos Blue

30 October 2013, 11:43 AM	#25
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	I like the classic 16613. I got tired of the green bezel although the dial is gorgeous.

30 October 2013, 11:47 AM	#27
BNA/LION 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,650	16613 bluesy here... __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

30 October 2013, 12:12 PM	#28
barad55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Woodland Hills CA Watch: BLNR Posts: 184	You're only 28 years old very young.. so my vote is the HULK for more flashy look.. I'm not gonna gonna wear something with gold until I'm in late 40's IMO. and u also mentioned that you already have DJ with gold but its still up to you. GL!

30 October 2013, 12:33 PM	#29
SixPak "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Phong Location: Toronto Posts: 2,718	I voted for the 16613 the last time but going for the LVc this time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)