ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

joejoe1225 · 15 November 2013, 04:27 AM

Just looking for some guidance - Thank you!!!

Joe

Psmith · 15 November 2013, 04:29 AM

Why not - the more the merrier!

They are different enough, at least to us WIS-types

subtona · 15 November 2013, 04:31 AM

SD for me.

Too many different styles to have such overlap... I did have a few divers in my collection at one time, when i questioned myself, i got it down to the 1 i liked best.

Also the old style have served me so well for so long, i cant find any merit to the newer type.

Cc1966 · 15 November 2013, 04:33 AM

Like them both, have them both ~ enough differences for me to pull the trigger.

jjnd08 · 15 November 2013, 04:33 AM

No. I like diversity. I don't even want two subs. I debated keeping the Hulk I had, and adding a 16613; ultimately, I did a trade for the 16613 so that I wouldn't have two divers.

To each their own, but that wasn't for me.

perpetualman88 · 15 November 2013, 04:39 AM

If your collection is somewhat large with good diversity I say go for it.

watchdog507 · 15 November 2013, 04:48 AM

I had both a Sub C Date and a DSSD. I like the size of the DSSD and stopped wearing the Sub C. DSSD for me.

CDNWatchNut · 15 November 2013, 05:16 AM

No, but I'd have a Sea Dweller.

AK797 · 15 November 2013, 05:17 AM

No opportunity cost is too high, there are a lot of other Rolexes and APs and PPs etc that I want.

bridgs · 15 November 2013, 05:21 AM

I would like to have a Sea-Dweller. I have the sub and would gladly trade it and some cash if I had for the Dweller. I do not think it would be practical for me to have a sub and SD though.

capote · 15 November 2013, 05:43 AM

I would not want two divers of the same brand. Too many other interesting watches out there.

kultschar · 15 November 2013, 05:50 AM

I had a Sub-C LN but along came the DSSD and I stopped wearing the Sub-C LN

To create a bit of variety in my small collection I sold the Sub-C LN and bought a Sub-C LV (The Hulk). Now I wear both :)

up2nogood · 15 November 2013, 06:00 AM

Yes, but only as my Sub C is gold. Otherwise.....

h999r · 15 November 2013, 06:01 AM

I wont have both watches in my collection, either one is OK, because they look almost the same.

katana · 15 November 2013, 06:28 AM

Perfect combination, now maybe a GMT Master 1675 ..... Vintage ..?

Sam Philip · 15 November 2013, 06:29 AM

I have both, they are 2 different watches

FTX I · 15 November 2013, 06:38 AM

No SD for me. Not a fan of the thickness.

accce · 15 November 2013, 06:39 AM

I did but the sub got no love so I got rid of it.

kcmo · 15 November 2013, 06:39 AM

Nope

kilyung · 15 November 2013, 06:41 AM

Yes, why not if you can?

swils8610 · 15 November 2013, 06:42 AM

Sure. I have a 16610 and a 116710.

Roselló · 15 November 2013, 06:55 AM

Not a Sub C, until they change "if they do" the fat lugs... I own a SD 16600 & DJ 116200 and I would love a 16610 in my collection.

raclaims · 15 November 2013, 06:57 AM

I wouldn't.

They are just too similar.

As it is, with the sub and blnr they are too similar and they are more different than a sub and dssd

1William · 15 November 2013, 07:09 AM

Yes. Both great watches and if you like them why not.

Jack T · 15 November 2013, 07:12 AM

I am happy with my Sub. As impressive as the SD is, my collection is too small for overlaps.

Bernie.H. · 15 November 2013, 08:59 AM

A DSSD and an LVc would be a good combination, otherwise no.

mjclark32 · 15 November 2013, 10:15 AM

Why not?

toph · 15 November 2013, 10:30 AM

They are quite different watches. If you like both and want both I believe they are different enough to merit having both.

nauticajoe · 15 November 2013, 10:32 AM

My vote.....Yes!

SLS · 15 November 2013, 10:36 AM

Not a fan of the Sub C at all...I do have a SD 16600 and a 16610. Not a fan of the DSSD either, I bought a DSSD and flipped it in a week. We can not all like the same stuff, that would be boring!
Scott

View Poll Results: Sub C and a Sea Dweller in the same collection??
YES	60	48.78%
NO	63	51.22%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

15 November 2013, 04:27 AM	#1
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	Would you have A Sub C and a Sea Dweller in your Collection Yes or No and why Just looking for some guidance - Thank you!!! Joe __________________

15 November 2013, 04:29 AM	#2
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Why not - the more the merrier! They are different enough, at least to us WIS-types __________________

15 November 2013, 04:31 AM	#3
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,601	SD for me. Too many different styles to have such overlap... I did have a few divers in my collection at one time, when i questioned myself, i got it down to the 1 i liked best. Also the old style have served me so well for so long, i cant find any merit to the newer type. __________________

15 November 2013, 04:33 AM	#4
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Like them both, have them both ~ enough differences for me to pull the trigger. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

15 November 2013, 04:33 AM	#5
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	No. I like diversity. I don't even want two subs. I debated keeping the Hulk I had, and adding a 16613; ultimately, I did a trade for the 16613 so that I wouldn't have two divers. To each their own, but that wasn't for me.

15 November 2013, 04:39 AM	#6
perpetualman88 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: David Farkas Location: Los Angeles Watch: 116610, 5712/1A Posts: 8,182	If your collection is somewhat large with good diversity I say go for it.

15 November 2013, 04:48 AM	#7
watchdog507 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: YYZ, RSW Watch: Rose Gold Posts: 1,675	I had both a Sub C Date and a DSSD. I like the size of the DSSD and stopped wearing the Sub C. DSSD for me.

15 November 2013, 05:16 AM	#8
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	No, but I'd have a Sea Dweller.

15 November 2013, 05:17 AM	#9
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	No opportunity cost is too high, there are a lot of other Rolexes and APs and PPs etc that I want.

15 November 2013, 05:21 AM	#10
bridgs "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Shane Location: Minnesota Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 1,125	I would like to have a Sea-Dweller. I have the sub and would gladly trade it and some cash if I had for the Dweller. I do not think it would be practical for me to have a sub and SD though.

15 November 2013, 05:43 AM	#11
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	I would not want two divers of the same brand. Too many other interesting watches out there.

15 November 2013, 05:50 AM	#12
kultschar "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: End of the World Watch: PP & Rolex Posts: 1,970	I had a Sub-C LN but along came the DSSD and I stopped wearing the Sub-C LN To create a bit of variety in my small collection I sold the Sub-C LN and bought a Sub-C LV (The Hulk). Now I wear both :)

15 November 2013, 06:00 AM	#13
up2nogood "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Alex Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: Idiot Savant Posts: 1,944	Yes, but only as my Sub C is gold. Otherwise.....

15 November 2013, 06:01 AM	#14
h999r Banned Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: HR Location: Planet Earth Watch: -ing Barts. Posts: 4,244	I wont have both watches in my collection, either one is OK, because they look almost the same.

15 November 2013, 06:28 AM	#15
katana "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Paradis Location: Sweden Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust Posts: 885	Perfect combination, now maybe a GMT Master 1675 ..... Vintage ..? __________________

15 November 2013, 06:29 AM	#16
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	I have both, they are 2 different watches

15 November 2013, 06:38 AM	#17
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	No SD for me. Not a fan of the thickness.

15 November 2013, 06:39 AM	#18
accce "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Chevy Chase Watch: WG Daytona Posts: 1,088	I did but the sub got no love so I got rid of it.

15 November 2013, 06:39 AM	#19
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	Nope

15 November 2013, 06:41 AM	#20
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Yes, why not if you can?

15 November 2013, 06:42 AM	#21
swils8610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: shannon Location: usa Posts: 9,211	Sure. I have a 16610 and a 116710.

15 November 2013, 06:55 AM	#22
Roselló "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SA, Texas. Watch: * { SD & DJ } * Posts: 943	Not a Sub C, until they change "if they do" the fat lugs... I own a SD 16600 & DJ 116200 and I would love a 16610 in my collection. __________________ ......... All In.

15 November 2013, 06:57 AM	#23
raclaims "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: NJ Posts: 2,624	I wouldn't. They are just too similar. As it is, with the sub and blnr they are too similar and they are more different than a sub and dssd

15 November 2013, 07:09 AM	#24
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,801	Yes. Both great watches and if you like them why not.

15 November 2013, 07:12 AM	#25
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,719	I am happy with my Sub. As impressive as the SD is, my collection is too small for overlaps. __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

15 November 2013, 08:59 AM	#26
Bernie.H. Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: England Posts: 514	A DSSD and an LVc would be a good combination, otherwise no.

15 November 2013, 10:15 AM	#27
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Why not? __________________

15 November 2013, 10:30 AM	#28
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	They are quite different watches. If you like both and want both I believe they are different enough to merit having both. __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

15 November 2013, 10:32 AM	#29
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	My vote.....Yes! Attached Images

15 November 2013, 10:36 AM	#30
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Not a fan of the Sub C at all...I do have a SD 16600 and a 16610. Not a fan of the DSSD either, I bought a DSSD and flipped it in a week. We can not all like the same stuff, that would be boring! Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)