The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 November 2013, 05:51 AM   #1
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Family Guy

"Family Guy" executive producer Steve Callaghan told E! Online that the writers thought Brian's fatal accident was a fun way to shake things up.

'Family Guy' has killed off one of its most loved characters.

Audiences were shocked when Brian, the sophisticated family dog, was hit by a speeding car and lay lifeless on the road in last Sunday's episode.

The character, who had been in the show since the pilot, uttered "You've given me a wonderful life, I love you all," as he closed his eyes for the very last time.


Not a fan of the show . What kind of writers think killing off the dog (fictional character or not) is a fun way to shake things up.

Fictional or not ,sickos is the only word I can think of to describe the people who write this type of so called entertainment..
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 05:52 AM   #2
perpetualman88
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
perpetualman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,182
Ya honestly I was disappointed they got rid of brian especially the way they did it.

I hope they bring him back somehow in future episodes
perpetualman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 06:28 AM   #3
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
It's a cartoon.

They could do anything that the imagination and animation technology allows.
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 06:46 AM   #4
teqp
"TRF" Member
 
teqp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Phil
Location: SoCal
Watch: 116613LN
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstore
What kind of writers think killing off the dog (fictional character or not) is a fun way to shake things up.
Well, it's a cartoon and the creator (Seth MacFarlane) tends to go against the grain when it comes to Family Guy. The Family Guy is not for everyone, but those who like it, will miss Brian the Dog. I for one think getting rid of Brian was not the best for the show...I mean who doesn't like a wise cracking talking dog??? I know I do.

I hope they bring him back.
teqp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 06:50 AM   #5
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
It's a cartoon.

They could do anything that the imagination and animation technology allows.
Yes they can,the real issue is should they, it seems today the criteria is anything goes when it comes to making a buck.
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 07:05 AM   #6
mannyv11
"TRF" Member
 
mannyv11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,510
I mean based upon the show I don't think it was anything out of the ordinary. Many characters have been "killed" on the show and have come back. I believe a couple of weeks ago Meg was killed and ended up coming back.

Also according to the episode list brian has his name in a few titles and also has one of his own episodes coming up in the fall of 2014 so he will be brought back.

Let's not forget stewie has a time machine =)
mannyv11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 07:10 AM   #7
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
Wait, what? After eleven seasons of Family Guy, one of the characters dying is what upsets you?

Everyone has their own set of buttons, I guess.
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 02:38 PM   #8
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
Wait, what? After eleven seasons of Family Guy, one of the characters dying is what upsets you?

Everyone has their own set of buttons, I guess.


I love the show more than anything on tv, up there with south park & of course the simpsons, cartoons have always gotten away with stuff reality couldn't,
when i was a kid i watched the adult cartoon at the time "Wait till your father gets home," then cutting edge.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbsEYoK...%3DmbsEYoKm9X8
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 03:13 PM   #9
hdrazor251
"TRF" Member
 
hdrazor251's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Arizona
Watch: is recovered!!
Posts: 4,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post


when i was a kid i watched the adult cartoon at the time "Wait till your father gets home," then cutting edge.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbsEYoK...%3DmbsEYoKm9X8
I had forgotten about that one.
__________________
16753 GMT Master, 16613 Bluesy, 16710 GMT Master II, 16570 Polar Explorer II-Stolen & Recovered!!
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
hdrazor251 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 November 2013, 09:45 AM   #10
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticMoose View Post
Wait, what? After eleven seasons of Family Guy, one of the characters dying is what upsets you?

Everyone has their own set of buttons, I guess.


Seriously, there are so many other things that have been offensive in this show that picking up on this one issue is sort of silly.

If I read right, the OP doesn't even watch the show and is just peeved that a cartoon dog was killed on a cartoon show. So, he doesn't watch the show and read an article on it, which explains why the post is so bizarre and devoid of context concerning the show itself.
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2013, 06:11 AM   #11
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueueCumber View Post


Seriously, there are so many other things that have been offensive in this show that picking up on this one issue is sort of silly.

If I read right, the OP doesn't even watch the show and is just peeved that a cartoon dog was killed on a cartoon show. So, he doesn't watch the show and read an article on it, which explains why the post is so bizarre and devoid of context concerning the show itself.
"Family Guy" executive producer Steve Callaghan told E! Online that the writers thought Brian's fatal accident was a fun way to shake things up.

I guess it depends how one defines fun. I personally see no humor in running over a dog, fictional or otherwise,but hey that's me. That was/is the point of my original post ,not the context but rather the notion that it was a "fun way to shake things up".
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2013, 05:26 AM   #12
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstore View Post
"Family Guy" executive producer Steve Callaghan told E! Online that the writers thought Brian's fatal accident was a fun way to shake things up.

I guess it depends how one defines fun. I personally see no humor in running over a dog, fictional or otherwise,but hey that's me. That was/is the point of my original post ,not the context but rather the notion that it was a "fun way to shake things up".
I grew up with dogs, and have two dogs that I, my wife, and my kids love to death (no pun intended). They are members of our family.

But, I also laughed very hard during the dog scene in National Lampoon's Vacation. I have no issue with differentiating fiction/comedy from reality. I guess I don't understand what is so controversial here.



__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 08:05 AM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Time for a new character! Poochie?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (59.2 KB, 265 views)
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 02:03 PM   #14
seand442
"TRF" Member
 
seand442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116610
Posts: 3,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
Time for a new character! Poochie?
Nice simpsons reference.
__________________
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
seand442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 02:45 PM   #15
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstore View Post
Fictional or not ,sickos is the only word I can think of to describe the people who write this type of so called entertainment..
Killing off a popular character is a brave move from a writer. It goes against conventional thinking and uses those deaths to promote a gritty reality that characters have to face to motivate them and push the stories forward.

While we would like to believe that the main protagonists will always walk away and live to fight another day. Their passing serves to remind us that death is an inevitable part of life.
Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 02:49 PM   #16
threemonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
threemonkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
This bums me out.
threemonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 03:14 PM   #17
bungcarlo
"TRF" Member
 
bungcarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Erwin
Location: usa
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 685
Why not kill that sex maniac Quagmire...giggity!
bungcarlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 10:31 PM   #18
therolexguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
therolexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by bungcarlo View Post
Why not kill that sex maniac Quagmire...giggity!
Awwwwww COME ON.
therolexguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 November 2013, 02:17 AM   #19
Touring
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Touring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hoth
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by bungcarlo View Post
Why not kill that sex maniac Quagmire...giggity!
I actually agree. The Quagmire character has really taken on a mean streak recently and is no longer the irreverent lothario he was years ago. Problem is, with Cleveland gone (spin-off was a terrible idea), Peter would only have Joe to hang out with so probably not going to happen.
Touring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 05:02 PM   #20
sm4k
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 2
Pure speculation but I recall in an interview once seth mentioned it was difficult and hurt his throat a bit to do brians voice at times.

I am sure he could easily enough find a suitable replacement (re:chef) but maybe he did not have the heat to give up the character and just wanted a break.

Besides everyone knows titanium capacitors arent really that difficult to source :)
sm4k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 06:13 AM   #21
SaddleSC
"TRF" Member
 
SaddleSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by sm4k View Post
Pure speculation but I recall in an interview once seth mentioned it was difficult and hurt his throat a bit to do brians voice at times.
I highly doubt it since Brian's voice is basically Seth McFarlane's actual voice. It is pretty much the only character that would not cause any strain whatsoever on Seth's vocal cords.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB
SaddleSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 06:21 AM   #22
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by sm4k View Post
Pure speculation but I recall in an interview once seth mentioned it was difficult and hurt his throat a bit to do brians voice at times.

.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaddleSC View Post
I highly doubt it since Brian's voice is basically Seth McFarlane's actual voice. It is pretty much the only character that would not cause any strain whatsoever on Seth's vocal cords.
Just saw that recently, I think it may have been the other way around, brian is the easiest voice to do.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 08:11 PM   #23
Monte Cristo
"TRF" Member
 
Monte Cristo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
Killing off popular characters seems to be the fashion these days, examples game of Thrones, Boardwalk empire, etc
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill
Monte Cristo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 04:17 PM   #24
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monte Cristo View Post
Killing off popular characters seems to be the fashion these days, examples game of Thrones, Boardwalk empire, etc
George RR Martin was doing it long before it was cool :P
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/...hrones-deaths/

Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2013, 10:37 PM   #25
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
Kenny gets killed every episode. They could bring him back if they needed to.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 12:18 AM   #26
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
He will be back. In Wikipedia, they show two titles for later episodes this season that have "Brian" in the title.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 12:33 AM   #27
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstore View Post

Not a fan of the show . What kind of writers think killing off the dog (fictional character or not) is a fun way to shake things up.

Fictional or not ,sickos is the only word I can think of to describe the people who write this type of so called entertainment..
It's okay, it's just a funny cartoon - chill, dude! I think it is very entertaining and amusing. Haven't seen it in a while. Shame about Brian, though, he was one of the highlights. Would have loved to have seen that episode.
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 04:09 AM   #28
themast
"TRF" Member
 
themast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,707
I had the impression that the car that ran over Brian was shaped after a Mercedes Benz.

This directly ties his death back to this forum!
themast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 04:22 AM   #29
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Frankly I don't think killing or bringing back Brian does anything for the show. Other than to get people like us talking about it, but the only thing more annoying then watching an episode of family guy is watching an episode of the simpsons or south park. They have covered all the bases 3 times over with their story lines and for gods sake just cause they still have viable ratings doesn't mean they should go on forever... 1987 guys, 1987. That's when the simpsons started 1980' freakin 7

I mean enough already, the tweens who watched the first season of the simpsons are getting ready to retire for creeps sake... Heck my nephew who wasn't even born when south park started is about to finish grad school...

Brian-schmian, maybe now he can get his book published and make up with Jillian and stay the freak out of my life!!!
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2013, 05:35 AM   #30
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
Seth MacFarlane has said several times he's tired of doing FG and I think this is the beginning of the end. He felt it should have ended after season 7 but everyone still likes it and watches it. I'm sure it's hard work to put it all together since he does a lot of the jobs for the show himself...I'm sure with lots of help. Sometimes a show just needs to bow out while it's popular (Seinfeld) and not drag out into something like Lost.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.