ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

J.Armando · 12 December 2013, 10:03 AM

Article today on Yahoo regarding Luxury Watches. Mainly "Rolexes".

Enjoy :

http://shopping.yahoo.com/news/the-c...204438808.html

joe100 · 12 December 2013, 10:59 AM

The article is "eh" but the comments are classic.

powerfunk · 13 December 2013, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe100

The article is "eh" but the comments are classic.

x2 Some priceless gems in there

Yahoo user Q10 explains why watches are unnecessary: "You become very aware of clocks on walls, receipts, your car, your phone,,, its about 2 hours since breakfast and I ate at 8:15 (clock on the diner wall, car radio was 9:25 when I left) I learned to get along without them. For me I have no use for it hanging on my wrist."

Ector495 · 12 December 2013, 11:36 AM

I think most people in the comments aren't watch enthusiasts. It takes a passion to want to collect or own high end watches. I sometimes think, "why do I have one when others struggle with day to day things?" In the end I try to justify it by saying that its a beautiful timepiece and it will last longer than me. It's also something that I can hand down if I ever have any kids.

Laszlo · 12 December 2013, 11:43 AM

I read this, this morning. Poorly written citizen journalism.

swils8610 · 12 December 2013, 11:58 AM

Not a fan of that article...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jjnd08 · 12 December 2013, 12:21 PM

Article was pretty uninformative. And the comments were the typical ones that you see on any article like that: "buying an expensive watch is stupid." "No. You don't understand a fine time piece."

iazrollie · 12 December 2013, 12:49 PM

"a ... Daytona cosmograph or Daytona panda dial" Isn't the latter also the former? Love the journalist nativity.

GradyPhilpott · 12 December 2013, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iazrollie

"a ... Daytona cosmograph or Daytona panda dial" Isn't the latter also the former? Love the journalist nativity.

He mentioned his birth?

Racerdj · 12 December 2013, 12:49 PM

Some nice comments on the Daytona

madgoncalves · 12 December 2013, 02:01 PM

Amazing what passes for journalism...I've read it three times and I still don't understand the purpose of the "article."

GradyPhilpott · 12 December 2013, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madgoncalves

Amazing what passes for journalism...I've read it three times and I still don't understand the purpose of the "article."

Clicks. The internet is all about clicks.

Grissom · 12 December 2013, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Clicks. The internet is all about clicks.

Absolutely!!

I also saw the article earlier today, and was summarily disappointed. Waste of that "click", and not even timely....haven't seen any semblance of a "Daytona Shortage" of late, like we saw in years gone by......

Grady, as usual, you definitely

jbshaffer · 13 December 2013, 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

Clicks. The internet is all about clicks.

...speaking of clicks...I clicked on the "5 Stylish Dive Watches" link, below the article, which lead me to the Timex Intelligent Quartz Depth Gauge link which I followed to Timex.com. As I have a fondness for dive watches particularly those with a depth function, after a little research I ended up with new Timex Depth Gauge from Herberger's for $168.75

Hairdude1 · 12 December 2013, 05:32 PM

Why even run this article, what was the purpose?

How · 12 December 2013, 08:35 PM

One of the worst articles about luxury watches I have ever read.

Cc1966 · 13 December 2013, 03:11 AM

...based on your comments, I skipped it. Thank you.

subtona · 13 December 2013, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cc1966

...based on your comments, I skipped it. Thank you.

x2

Presa canary · 13 December 2013, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cc1966

...based on your comments, i skipped it. Thank you.

x3

mtrunner · 13 December 2013, 04:32 AM

I loved the comments section as well. Good entertainment.

12 December 2013, 10:03 AM	#1
J.Armando 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: PR Posts: 118	They are starting to catch on !!! Article today on Yahoo regarding Luxury Watches. Mainly "Rolexes". Enjoy : http://shopping.yahoo.com/news/the-c...204438808.html

12 December 2013, 10:59 AM	#2
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	The article is "eh" but the comments are classic. __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

12 December 2013, 11:43 AM	#5
Laszlo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA Watch: Date & No Date Posts: 10,868	I read this, this morning. Poorly written citizen journalism. __________________ "You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca

12 December 2013, 12:49 PM	#8
iazrollie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Ian Location: NY Watch: All of them Posts: 3,245	"a ... Daytona cosmograph or Daytona panda dial" Isn't the latter also the former? Love the journalist nativity. __________________ Rolex, PPs, Breitling

12 December 2013, 12:49 PM	#10
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Some nice comments on the Daytona __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

12 December 2013, 11:36 AM	#4
Ector495 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: 16622 Posts: 1,097	I think most people in the comments aren't watch enthusiasts. It takes a passion to want to collect or own high end watches. I sometimes think, "why do I have one when others struggle with day to day things?" In the end I try to justify it by saying that its a beautiful timepiece and it will last longer than me. It's also something that I can hand down if I ever have any kids.

12 December 2013, 11:58 AM	#6
swils8610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: shannon Location: usa Posts: 9,211	Not a fan of that article... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 December 2013, 12:21 PM	#7
jjnd08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 8,615	Article was pretty uninformative. And the comments were the typical ones that you see on any article like that: "buying an expensive watch is stupid." "No. You don't understand a fine time piece."

12 December 2013, 02:01 PM	#11
madgoncalves Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: NYC Watch: '85 1680, AP RO Posts: 148	Amazing what passes for journalism...I've read it three times and I still don't understand the purpose of the "article."

12 December 2013, 05:32 PM	#15
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Why even run this article, what was the purpose?

12 December 2013, 08:35 PM	#16
How "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Melbourne Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960 Posts: 1,554	One of the worst articles about luxury watches I have ever read.

13 December 2013, 03:11 AM	#17
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	...based on your comments, I skipped it. Thank you. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

13 December 2013, 04:32 AM	#20
mtrunner 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Gary Location: Bozeman, MT Watch: 126508 Paul Newman Posts: 7,835	I loved the comments section as well. Good entertainment.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)