ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 January 2014, 09:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
|
Experimenting with sleep positions . . .
I seem to recall a thread about what position is best to keep your watch over night for it to maintain the most accurate time.
Just wondering what quirks others may have found regarding their particular timepieces. This might just save someone from winding/resetting frequently. My 6605 absolutely hates me when I make her sleep on her left side (crown up), and will either lose a great amount of time or stop completely. If I lay her on her right side (crown down - which I prefer not to do) she only loses a few minutes or seconds over night. But, if I lie her on her back (face up) then she sleeps like a baby and wakes up purring like a kitten spot on and raring to go. Thanks, and Happy New Year all . . . . . |
16 January 2014, 10:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
Each watch will be different in different positions. I have a timegrapher that I check all my watches with. Best $200 I ever spent.
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
16 January 2014, 10:40 AM | #3 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Quote:
__________________
_______________________ |
|
16 January 2014, 10:53 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
The old Rolex literature that you've seen around says dial up to gain a bit, crown up to lose a bit, and crown down to slow a tad more than that. I haven't seen that document with any recent Rolex I've purchased and don't think it affects the current gen very much.
In any event, anything more than a few seconds probably needs to be looked at.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
16 January 2014, 11:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
None of my modern pieces are affected by positions, they all run right on, however the vintage models do.I leave my 1680 crown down as it gains a bit, and the 1675 crystal up overnight, which helps keep them running very much perfectly on time.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
18 January 2014, 07:03 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: London
Posts: 2
|
Is this the one?
|
16 January 2014, 04:42 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2014, 04:53 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
|
It's just me not wanting to put excessive wear on the crown. That said I'd probably be better off using the case and stop laying it on top of the dresser.
|
16 January 2014, 05:11 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Just put a bit of cloth under it to stop minor scratches.
__________________
_______________________ |
17 January 2014, 03:08 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
My 1665 gains one-two seconds overnight when in crown up position. If you are seeing minute differences, time for a visit to your watchmaker of choice mate...
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
19 January 2014, 10:13 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: run down shack
Watch: Oyster Speedking
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
I've been monitoring the watch for the past 10 days, while keeping it on it's back at night - it has only lost 24 seconds which factors out at -02.5 p/d. Guess I'll just keep a watch on it for a bit longer.... "Thanks" for all the input though!
__________________
Roger 呂若 |
|
19 January 2014, 10:37 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
18 January 2014, 07:13 PM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Yes.
__________________
_______________________ |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.