ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

swils8610 · 23 January 2014, 01:59 AM

Thinking of making this flip. The Pan 312 is to big for me even though I have a large wrist. I currently have a 16610 and a 116710 BLNR. Would you do the flip? Thanks.

mannyv11 · 23 January 2014, 02:02 AM

I wouldn't. I like pams but I love my exp 2 =)

good luck, either way get the watch that sings to you the most and that you will enjoy =)

Rolex40mm · 23 January 2014, 02:06 AM

Rolex sports watches beat Panerai any day of the week. I wouldn't do it.

beshannon · 23 January 2014, 02:07 AM

No, never.

I would not trade any Rolex for any Panerai.

MisterStefan · 23 January 2014, 02:08 AM

I would not do that, but whatever you think is the best.
But that also is because I'm not a fan of Panerai at all.

echau · 23 January 2014, 02:53 AM

I'm a fan of Panerai, and I wouldn't make the trade...mostly because the 392 is a 42 mm, which to be honest, you'd get tired of quickly and wish you had a 44 mm. The 312 probably feels big because it's a 1950's case. You should try on something with the bettarini case instead, maybe a 111 or a 390. If you still think those are large, get a 45mm radiomir--they wear smaller than the 44mm models.

Or just keep your 216570, because it's just not worth trading for a 392.

Cc1966 · 23 January 2014, 03:01 AM

I would keep the polar Exp II if it was me.

superdog · 23 January 2014, 03:03 AM

I love the style of PAM. But no, I would not make that flip.

Annan · 23 January 2014, 03:15 AM

Love my EXPII and would not do such a trade. In the end though, it's entirely your choice. If you haven't already, compare them side by side in person and see which sings loudest.

FTX I · 23 January 2014, 03:41 AM

I would not do it.

kilyung · 23 January 2014, 04:08 AM

Not for the 392.

joe100 · 23 January 2014, 04:10 AM

Negative!

ccarguy · 23 January 2014, 05:59 AM

Been there done that.......still kicking myself in the ass for doing it

Should have kept the Explorer II, so NO I would'nt do that deal. Panerai is loosing value everyday it seems like! If you go to switch back it will cost you for sure!

watchwatcher · 23 January 2014, 07:35 AM

Agree with the others, no I wouldn't.

nauticajoe · 23 January 2014, 08:34 AM

Wrong section.

You may want to ask in the PAM sub-forum.

petenyc · 23 January 2014, 08:42 AM

no way

woodsworth · 23 January 2014, 09:41 AM

392, no way. 372? Maybe.

And even then, that is a big maybe

Nidal · 23 January 2014, 10:37 AM

This is Rolex forum. So no.
Go to Pam forum if you want the yes. :)

kilyung · 23 January 2014, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nidal

This is Rolex forum. So no.
Go to Pam forum if you want the yes. :)

Probably not even there.

mailman · 23 January 2014, 10:54 AM

I wouldn't but it's whatever makes you happy.

adamlea · 23 January 2014, 11:43 AM

I wouldn't do it - but I'm not a Pam fan.

slomo · 23 January 2014, 10:40 AM

not for the 392....for the 351 maybe....

bde · 23 January 2014, 11:47 AM

No way.

KINGROLESAR · 23 January 2014, 11:48 AM

Since you asked our answer is NO.

affalterbach · 23 January 2014, 11:51 AM

I wouldn't flip a Casio G-Shock for a Panerai. The 216570 is a great watch. Don't do anything crazy.

alubin · 23 January 2014, 11:55 AM

I wouldn't.

Laszlo · 23 January 2014, 01:49 PM

Never!

jvo300 · 23 January 2014, 01:54 PM

No way.

viper9669 · 23 January 2014, 01:57 PM

No

swils8610 · 23 January 2014, 02:08 PM

Thanks for all the great input!! Will keep the 216570!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

23 January 2014, 01:59 AM	#1
swils8610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: shannon Location: usa Posts: 9,211	Flipping my 216570 polar for a Pan 392... Thinking of making this flip. The Pan 312 is to big for me even though I have a large wrist. I currently have a 16610 and a 116710 BLNR. Would you do the flip? Thanks.

23 January 2014, 02:07 AM	#4
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	No, never. I would not trade any Rolex for any Panerai. __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

23 January 2014, 03:01 AM	#7
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	I would keep the polar Exp II if it was me. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

23 January 2014, 03:03 AM	#8
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,834	I love the style of PAM. But no, I would not make that flip. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

23 January 2014, 03:15 AM	#9
Annan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Ron Location: Arizona, USA Watch: 116233 Posts: 3,180	Love my EXPII and would not do such a trade. In the end though, it's entirely your choice. If you haven't already, compare them side by side in person and see which sings loudest. __________________ *so many Rolexes.....so little time*

23 January 2014, 02:02 AM	#2
mannyv11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Manny Location: MA Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona Posts: 4,510	I wouldn't. I like pams but I love my exp 2 =) good luck, either way get the watch that sings to you the most and that you will enjoy =)

23 January 2014, 02:06 AM	#3
Rolex40mm Banned Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 373	Rolex sports watches beat Panerai any day of the week. I wouldn't do it.

23 January 2014, 02:08 AM	#5
MisterStefan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: - Posts: 290	I would not do that, but whatever you think is the best. But that also is because I'm not a fan of Panerai at all.

23 January 2014, 02:53 AM	#6
echau "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 350	I'm a fan of Panerai, and I wouldn't make the trade...mostly because the 392 is a 42 mm, which to be honest, you'd get tired of quickly and wish you had a 44 mm. The 312 probably feels big because it's a 1950's case. You should try on something with the bettarini case instead, maybe a 111 or a 390. If you still think those are large, get a 45mm radiomir--they wear smaller than the 44mm models. Or just keep your 216570, because it's just not worth trading for a 392.

23 January 2014, 03:41 AM	#10
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	I would not do it.

23 January 2014, 04:08 AM	#11
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Not for the 392.

23 January 2014, 04:10 AM	#12
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	Negative! __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

23 January 2014, 05:59 AM	#13
ccarguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: CHRIS Location: IL Watch: GMT'S Posts: 90	Been there done that.......still kicking myself in the ass for doing it Should have kept the Explorer II, so NO I would'nt do that deal. Panerai is loosing value everyday it seems like! If you go to switch back it will cost you for sure!

23 January 2014, 07:35 AM	#14
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	Agree with the others, no I wouldn't.

23 January 2014, 08:34 AM	#15
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Wrong section. You may want to ask in the PAM sub-forum.

23 January 2014, 08:42 AM	#16
petenyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: pete Location: NYC Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,011	no way

23 January 2014, 09:41 AM	#17
woodsworth "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: 100 Acre Wood Posts: 959	392, no way. 372? Maybe. And even then, that is a big maybe

23 January 2014, 10:37 AM	#18
Nidal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: USA Watch: SubC LV Posts: 1,821	This is Rolex forum. So no. Go to Pam forum if you want the yes. :)

23 January 2014, 10:54 AM	#20
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	I wouldn't but it's whatever makes you happy. __________________ JJ

23 January 2014, 11:43 AM	#21
adamlea "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Great Plains Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk Posts: 1,190	I wouldn't do it - but I'm not a Pam fan.

23 January 2014, 10:40 AM	#22
slomo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Andy Location: Pasadena, CA Watch: 14060M Posts: 212	not for the 392....for the 351 maybe....

23 January 2014, 11:47 AM	#23
bde "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Brad Location: Indiana Watch: -aholics anonymous Posts: 1,589	No way.

23 January 2014, 11:48 AM	#24
KINGROLESAR "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Drew Location: PHILADELPHIA Watch: CROWN MARKED Posts: 2,158	Since you asked our answer is NO.

23 January 2014, 11:51 AM	#25
affalterbach "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: USA Watch: Seiko SUN065P1 Posts: 359	I wouldn't flip a Casio G-Shock for a Panerai. The 216570 is a great watch. Don't do anything crazy.

23 January 2014, 11:55 AM	#26
alubin "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: USA Watch: All please! Posts: 1,042	I wouldn't.

23 January 2014, 01:49 PM	#27
Laszlo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA Watch: Date & No Date Posts: 10,868	Never! __________________ "You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca

23 January 2014, 01:54 PM	#28
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	No way.

23 January 2014, 01:57 PM	#29
viper9669 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Patrick Location: SIN Watch: Rolex Posts: 5,066	No

23 January 2014, 02:08 PM	#30
swils8610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: shannon Location: usa Posts: 9,211	Thanks for all the great input!! Will keep the 216570! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)