ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
27 February 2008, 09:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11
|
Fake?
I bought this dial on EBay and after taking a closer look, realized the minute markers were longer than what they should be. This is supposed to be for a 16613 and I’m curious if anyone can tell me whether they offered a dial with minute markers like this. The dial is extremely high quality and it kind of surprises me that someone would go to the expense of making this dial without getting the markings perfect.
|
27 February 2008, 09:45 AM | #2 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
The printing on the dial is poor too and the crown seems to have an odd shape
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
27 February 2008, 09:56 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
|
__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV |
27 February 2008, 11:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Coop
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Subs
Posts: 6,455
|
The surrounds of the lumes are too thick...IMO.
|
27 February 2008, 12:03 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Can you post a bigger picture of the back of the dial?
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
27 February 2008, 02:32 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11
|
Alcan:
I don’t have a lens that will take a picture that close and found a picture of the back of a Submariner dial online that looks identical as far as machining and post locations. The diameter is 27.25 mm and it is stamped on the back with SINGER + SINGER + SINGER with an inscribed set of numbers with a triangle in front and then 8371. The dial appears brand new and is an absolutely stunning blue. The picture I posted previously doesn’t do it justice as it is every bit a perfect dial in quality and craftsmanship. I’ve owned several Submariners and I put this dial next to any of those dials and not know the difference, except for the length of the minute markers. Is it possible this is an original Rolex dial that has been refinished? I paid $250 for it, which was pretty low. A used original in this condition would more than likely sell for $500. mb300se65 |
27 February 2008, 08:55 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: steven
Location: tampa bay
Watch: 1680 18k sub
Posts: 6,672
|
redone
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.