The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 March 2014, 04:00 AM   #1
BJHofkin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 259
Sea Dweller: Worth Waiting for Basel?

I'm planning on picking up a mint, late-model 16600 as my first Rolex.

The only thing that would get in the way at this point would be the introduction of an all-new Sea Dweller smaller and thinner than the Deep Sea (which is way too big for me).

There's been much discussion here on such a watch and the likelihood of its introduction; although I think it'd be an ENORMOUS hit, I think it's unlikely Rolex would introduce such a model only 6 years after the Deep Sea and only a few after the SubC update.

That said, all the other sports models have been updated recently too, and I think Rolex will do SOMETHING with one of its SS sports models. A new bezel for the GMT, perhaps, but the BLNR is only a year old, so I'm not sure about that either.

In sum, I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility that we will in fact see a new Sea Dweller this year. My question is, do you think the likelihood is high enough to warrant waiting on picking up a 16600? I'm getting itchy, but Basel is less than a month way…
BJHofkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:02 AM   #2
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,674
If you're getting itchy already, even if they do release a new SD this year, you will be waiting most of it to get your hands on one.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:02 AM   #3
Lgear080
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
Considering a 16600 is so different than any potential releases, no.
Lgear080 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:23 AM   #4
dimster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lgear080 View Post
Considering a 16600 is so different than any potential releases, no.
Agreed, there can only be one 16600 but I would wait another 3 weeks and see what is introduced at Basel. Maybe something else that will spark your interest?
dimster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:03 AM   #5
emurray703
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Eric
Location: Nashville
Posts: 109
I sure hope. A 42 mm SD would sell like crazy. I may hang out at the AD on Feb 27th so I can be first in the list just in case.
emurray703 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:18 AM   #6
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Basel is only a few weeks away, so I'd wait for it and only make a decision after having seen what the new models would be. However, I seriously doubt Rolex would introduce a new SD. I suspect the news this year will be all about precious metals, and the show will be stolen by the ceramic bezeled gold Daytonas. I may be wrong though
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:28 AM   #7
DamageInc.77
"TRF" Member
 
DamageInc.77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
Get the 16600 before someone else does.

The 16600 is a perfect watch, and is worth owning no matter what new watch comes out.
DamageInc.77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:56 AM   #8
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Never regret to get 16600 even if a new one comes out
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:58 AM   #9
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
I would go with the buy what you want now philosophy as well. Maybe a new version of SD will come out, but even so, it isn't going to be too difficult to sell a 16600 SD down the road, IMO.
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 06:54 AM   #10
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamageInc.77 View Post
Get the 16600 before someone else does.

The 16600 is a perfect watch, and is worth owning no matter what new watch comes out.
This.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 09:23 AM   #11
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by damageinc.77 View Post
get the 16600 before someone else does.

The 16600 is a perfect watch, and is worth owning no matter what new watch comes out.
x2
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 09:02 AM   #12
carlitos1020
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: chicago
Watch: yachtmaster
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_walrus View Post
x2
x3
carlitos1020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:59 AM   #13
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 05:18 AM   #14
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
+1

I personally believe the 16600 is THE perfect watch, NOT some crazy 42mm version. IMHO, ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of a revised SD at Basel this year.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:28 PM   #15
Oryx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
+1

I personally believe the 16600 is THE perfect watch, NOT some crazy 42mm version. IMHO, ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of a revised SD at Basel this year.
Jason - you will have to wait and see then.

Lets revisit this thread after Rolex reveal their new models at Basel.
Oryx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 05:48 AM   #16
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
That's a big roj...
but be prepared to copy paste your response as there are still a few weeks until Basel.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 06:30 AM   #17
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
That's a big roj...
but be prepared to copy paste your response as there are still a few weeks until Basel.
I stand by what I say. If Rolex comes out with a 42mm SD, I'm ready to eat my words. That isn't going to happen, though.

Like Larry pointed out, there just isn't any room for a 42mm SD. Unless Rolex discontinues the DSSD, which will not happen, it would make no sense to add another dive watch.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 12:17 AM   #18
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I stand by what I say. If Rolex comes out with a 42mm SD, I'm ready to eat my words. That isn't going to happen, though.

Like Larry pointed out, there just isn't any room for a 42mm SD. Unless Rolex discontinues the DSSD, which will not happen, it would make no sense to add another dive watch.
Lol. you misunderstood me. I agree with your original assessment and what I meant regarding copy pasting is that you'll be repeating your statement because with Basel a few weeks away still, there will be quite a few of these threads asking the impossible.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 06:25 AM   #19
Laszlo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
Agree...
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die."

Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca
Laszlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 08:02 AM   #20
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
It's not gonna happen. Even if it were to happen, it wouldn't change how awesome the SD is......
Bingo
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 01:36 AM   #21
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
And I don't understand why people in speculation threads state opinions as facts.

Personally, I'd love to seem them do a 42mm Sub/SD (or even 44), but if they don't, oh well I guess. I don't know why people seem so hell bent on declaring that this will "never happen".
__________________
The above represents my opinion. I may be wrong, but that's how I feel.

Scratches ≠ "Character"
outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 01:45 AM   #22
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
Lol. you misunderstood me. I agree with your original assessment and what I meant regarding copy pasting is that you'll be repeating your statement because with Basel a few weeks away still, there will be quite a few of these threads asking the impossible.
Oh, my mistake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by outtatime View Post
And I don't understand why people in speculation threads state opinions as facts.

Personally, I'd love to seem them do a 42mm Sub/SD (or even 44), but if they don't, oh well I guess. I don't know why people seem so hell bent on declaring that this will "never happen".
Well, in that case, I'm looking forward to the new 36mm Submariner.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 01:48 AM   #23
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
Oh, my mistake!



Well, in that case, I'm looking forward to the new 36mm Submariner.
Hey, if that's what they decide, more power to them.

Nothing I'd ever buy, but maybe it would be a good seller.
__________________
The above represents my opinion. I may be wrong, but that's how I feel.

Scratches ≠ "Character"
outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 04:10 AM   #24
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
Whilst it might be a nice thought, it seems unlikely that a new SD will appear anytime soon. Rolex must have invested considerable finance in the Deepsea and only a few years back. Good as the Deepsea is, any new SD would surely impact negatively on it? There are still plenty of 16600 SDs about, so anyone thinking along those lines could do a lot worse than grabbing one ....or two...now!
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2014, 07:56 AM   #25
shalako
"TRF" Member
 
shalako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
+1 here also, they already have the SubC for those that find the DSSD too big, my money is on changes to the steel Daytona at this years Basle.
shalako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 04:59 AM   #26
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
It's not gonna happen. Even if it were to happen, it wouldn't change how awesome the SD is......
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 05:08 AM   #27
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
My crystal ball tells me you should get the SD now.

Even in the unlikely event that a revised diving model does appear, who's to say it's going to be exactly what you're expecting?

Also, as has been said previously, whatever new watches are released at Basel won't reach ADs until much later in the year.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 05:07 AM   #28
SaddleSC
"TRF" Member
 
SaddleSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
The Deep Sea and the original Sea Dweller have always been fringe pieces that appeal to a more limited market than the standard Submariner. Rolex poured a ton of R&D money into the DSSD to show what they were truly capable of. In my opinion, a 42mm Sea Dweller would be the perfect watch, but it is not going to happen, because it would cannibalize sales of the DSSD and IMO it would make their lineup of divers watches too congested (and slightly confusing to the lay person).

On the other hand, let's assume that I am completely wrong and Rolex does release a 42mm Sea Dweller at Basel this year. It is not like you will be able to head down to the AD and purchase it the following weekend. You will be waiting until the end of the summer at best or the end of the year at worst to get your hands on one at full msrp with no discounts. If you want a deal on one, you will be waiting another 12-14 months.

Buy the 16600 now...it is one of the best watches I have ever owned, and like Cru said, even if they do release a 42mm version, it won't change how awesome the 16600 is. You will love it.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB
SaddleSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 05:19 AM   #29
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Rolex doesn't operate like other companies where they change their models every couple of years to spark interest..

There isn't any significant difference between the current 43/44mm DSSD and 42mm.. If you want the DSSD lite, you get a Sub; there just is not any place in the line-up for a 42mm Diver at all. I can't understand why anybody thinks so..

Rolex usually does something new to a model around 10 years. They just did the "new" GMT blnr,

Look to the Air King getting a big-brother, maybe some muscle on the YM.. But I think that now they have the Tudor in the US market again, that is where you will see the emphasis..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2014, 07:39 AM   #30
Coubs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Watch: 116710
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post

Look to the Air King getting a big-brother, maybe some muscle on the YM.. But I think that now they have the Tudor in the US market again, that is where you will see the emphasis..
Really like the idea of an Air King II
Coubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.