ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
3 March 2014, 04:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 259
|
Sea Dweller: Worth Waiting for Basel?
I'm planning on picking up a mint, late-model 16600 as my first Rolex.
The only thing that would get in the way at this point would be the introduction of an all-new Sea Dweller smaller and thinner than the Deep Sea (which is way too big for me). There's been much discussion here on such a watch and the likelihood of its introduction; although I think it'd be an ENORMOUS hit, I think it's unlikely Rolex would introduce such a model only 6 years after the Deep Sea and only a few after the SubC update. That said, all the other sports models have been updated recently too, and I think Rolex will do SOMETHING with one of its SS sports models. A new bezel for the GMT, perhaps, but the BLNR is only a year old, so I'm not sure about that either. In sum, I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility that we will in fact see a new Sea Dweller this year. My question is, do you think the likelihood is high enough to warrant waiting on picking up a 16600? I'm getting itchy, but Basel is less than a month way… |
3 March 2014, 04:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,674
|
If you're getting itchy already, even if they do release a new SD this year, you will be waiting most of it to get your hands on one.
|
3 March 2014, 04:02 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
Considering a 16600 is so different than any potential releases, no.
|
3 March 2014, 04:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 361
|
|
3 March 2014, 04:03 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Eric
Location: Nashville
Posts: 109
|
I sure hope. A 42 mm SD would sell like crazy. I may hang out at the AD on Feb 27th so I can be first in the list just in case.
|
3 March 2014, 04:18 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Basel is only a few weeks away, so I'd wait for it and only make a decision after having seen what the new models would be. However, I seriously doubt Rolex would introduce a new SD. I suspect the news this year will be all about precious metals, and the show will be stolen by the ceramic bezeled gold Daytonas. I may be wrong though
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
3 March 2014, 04:28 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
|
Get the 16600 before someone else does.
The 16600 is a perfect watch, and is worth owning no matter what new watch comes out. |
3 March 2014, 04:56 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Never regret to get 16600 even if a new one comes out
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
3 March 2014, 04:58 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I would go with the buy what you want now philosophy as well. Maybe a new version of SD will come out, but even so, it isn't going to be too difficult to sell a 16600 SD down the road, IMO.
|
3 March 2014, 06:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
3 March 2014, 09:23 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
|
4 March 2014, 09:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: chicago
Watch: yachtmaster
Posts: 28
|
|
3 March 2014, 04:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
I don't understand why people think that Rolex may come out with a 42mm SD. It's not going to happen.
|
3 March 2014, 05:18 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
I personally believe the 16600 is THE perfect watch, NOT some crazy 42mm version. IMHO, ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of a revised SD at Basel this year.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
3 March 2014, 04:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,894
|
|
3 March 2014, 05:48 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
|
3 March 2014, 06:30 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
Like Larry pointed out, there just isn't any room for a 42mm SD. Unless Rolex discontinues the DSSD, which will not happen, it would make no sense to add another dive watch. |
|
4 March 2014, 12:17 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
|
|
3 March 2014, 06:25 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
|
Agree...
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca |
3 March 2014, 08:02 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
4 March 2014, 01:36 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
|
Quote:
Personally, I'd love to seem them do a 42mm Sub/SD (or even 44), but if they don't, oh well I guess. I don't know why people seem so hell bent on declaring that this will "never happen".
__________________
The above represents my opinion. I may be wrong, but that's how I feel. Scratches ≠ "Character" |
|
4 March 2014, 01:45 AM | #22 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
4 March 2014, 01:48 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
|
Quote:
Nothing I'd ever buy, but maybe it would be a good seller.
__________________
The above represents my opinion. I may be wrong, but that's how I feel. Scratches ≠ "Character" |
|
4 March 2014, 04:10 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Whilst it might be a nice thought, it seems unlikely that a new SD will appear anytime soon. Rolex must have invested considerable finance in the Deepsea and only a few years back. Good as the Deepsea is, any new SD would surely impact negatively on it? There are still plenty of 16600 SDs about, so anyone thinking along those lines could do a lot worse than grabbing one ....or two...now!
|
4 March 2014, 07:56 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 623
|
|
3 March 2014, 04:59 AM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
It's not gonna happen. Even if it were to happen, it wouldn't change how awesome the SD is......
|
3 March 2014, 05:08 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
My crystal ball tells me you should get the SD now.
Even in the unlikely event that a revised diving model does appear, who's to say it's going to be exactly what you're expecting? Also, as has been said previously, whatever new watches are released at Basel won't reach ADs until much later in the year. |
3 March 2014, 05:07 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
The Deep Sea and the original Sea Dweller have always been fringe pieces that appeal to a more limited market than the standard Submariner. Rolex poured a ton of R&D money into the DSSD to show what they were truly capable of. In my opinion, a 42mm Sea Dweller would be the perfect watch, but it is not going to happen, because it would cannibalize sales of the DSSD and IMO it would make their lineup of divers watches too congested (and slightly confusing to the lay person).
On the other hand, let's assume that I am completely wrong and Rolex does release a 42mm Sea Dweller at Basel this year. It is not like you will be able to head down to the AD and purchase it the following weekend. You will be waiting until the end of the summer at best or the end of the year at worst to get your hands on one at full msrp with no discounts. If you want a deal on one, you will be waiting another 12-14 months. Buy the 16600 now...it is one of the best watches I have ever owned, and like Cru said, even if they do release a 42mm version, it won't change how awesome the 16600 is. You will love it.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
3 March 2014, 05:19 AM | #29 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Rolex doesn't operate like other companies where they change their models every couple of years to spark interest..
There isn't any significant difference between the current 43/44mm DSSD and 42mm.. If you want the DSSD lite, you get a Sub; there just is not any place in the line-up for a 42mm Diver at all. I can't understand why anybody thinks so.. Rolex usually does something new to a model around 10 years. They just did the "new" GMT blnr, Look to the Air King getting a big-brother, maybe some muscle on the YM.. But I think that now they have the Tudor in the US market again, that is where you will see the emphasis..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
3 March 2014, 07:39 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Watch: 116710
Posts: 305
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.