ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
6 May 2014, 01:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 92
|
SDc vs Subc - Dial/Crystal Size
Has anyone actually measured (or obtained official specs for) the respective dial and crystal size for each of the current Sub and the new Sea Dweller Ceramic?
There is a lot of talk about how they look and wear, but I haven't seen any objective data regarding their actual respective dial size. Anyone? |
6 May 2014, 02:00 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
I suspect they are as they were in the pre ceramic models.
Sd dial a bit smaller / bezel a bit bigger / crystal a bit thicker. Pictures seem to confirm this. My question is the thickness of the watch front to back?
__________________
|
6 May 2014, 06:30 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Quote:
But then apparently with the WG GMT they have taken steps to prevent bezel parts being interchangeable they may have decided to take steps to prevent the SD bezel being used on the sub!? |
|
6 May 2014, 08:01 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
8 May 2014, 12:16 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 92
|
Noone?
|
8 May 2014, 01:25 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 425
|
SD c dial is actually bigger than the submariner ceramic dial.
__________________
SDC 4000 Explorer 2 |
8 May 2014, 01:55 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 92
|
|
13 May 2014, 05:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 92
|
So I guess the answer is no... Is there another place than here to get that info? I would have thought this would be THE place, but looks like my hopes may have been too high.
|
13 May 2014, 05:36 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Boston
Watch: 116710_ln
Posts: 275
|
|
13 May 2014, 05:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 397
|
The date window on the SDc seems to be a little more towards the centre than on the previous model which, assuming that the actual wheel itself hasn't been altered, suggests that the dial might have expanded a fraction.
(credit to Token74 for the picture) |
13 May 2014, 07:07 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
If the SDc isn't as the SD was smaller dial, larger bezel I will pass.
|
13 May 2014, 08:33 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 425
|
SD c dial is actually bigger than the sun C dial
__________________
SDC 4000 Explorer 2 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.