ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dman · 8 January 2006, 12:51 PM

...I have done this in the past and always liked the feedback and thoughts. So let's try this again. First off, this is for fun, so keep the wear whatever comments in your head.

Dylan and I leave for Hawaii in less than two weeks and I am undecided as to which watch to take.

I have the YM which of course can take the water and anything I throw at it, plus it has some subtle bling to it. And afterall it is a Rolex.

The UN Chrono, very unique and also a bit of bling. Rated to 100m so no worries in the water either. Maybe I can time how long the flight takes.

Or the 88, I have tons of straps I could take so the look would be different. I have a rubber and a cormaid velcro strap plus waterproof leather straps. And the obvious with this one, it tracks multi time zones, although I can usually add or subtract four hours from my home time.

But for fun, let me know which one to take. I may take two, but I doubt it. Also, don't just vote, give me a little feedback as to why. Let's hear it.

JJ Irani · 8 January 2006, 03:03 PM

This is a no-brainer, Daren. The YM in the blink of an eye. I wouldn't risk taking the new UN nor the Panny. For a place like Hawaii with all the surf, sun and sand...all you need is a Rolex....and the sunset!!!

dman · 8 January 2006, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

This is a no-brainer, Daren. The YM in the blink of an eye. I wouldn't risk taking the new UN nor the Panny. For a place like Hawaii with all the surf, sun and sand...all you need is a Rolex....and the sunset!!!

The YM is as polished as any of them JJ. The watch will not come off, except while golfing. It will be in the ocean, the pool and where ever else. Are you telling me the YM is that much more durable than the others?

JJ Irani · 8 January 2006, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dman

The YM is as polished as any of them JJ. The watch will not come off, except while golfing. It will be in the ocean, the pool and where ever else. Are you telling me the YM is that much more durable than the others?

YES!!!

dman · 8 January 2006, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

YES!!!

That is crazy. All have been pressure tested in the last month, all are perfect. That being said, the YM has a PLT bezel that not only scratches fairly easy, it also has to be sent to Geneva to be refinished.

JJ Irani · 8 January 2006, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dman

That is crazy. All have been pressure tested in the last month, all are perfect. That being said, the YM has a PLT bezel that not only scratches fairly easy, it also has to be sent to Geneva to be refinished.

Simple solution: Wear it with the bezel protector!!

Seriously, if you think ANY of your watches could be damaged, then just wear the Seiko BM and leave the rest at home!!

JJ

mailman · 8 January 2006, 09:12 PM

Ok dman, here's my thoughts. I voted take two. Now which two? I say the YM is a no brainer. Since it's the new bie to your collection, you can take the UN and give it a good amount of wrist time. The 88 you can take because of the options you have with it, straps, bracelet. Another thing, do you want to be monkeying around changing straps on vacation? I know it's not a big deal but it is vacation. I like it the best on the bracelet.

As JJ said CRACKER. That is my favorite looking Pam.
So anyway, you asked, there's my .02.

Gedanken · 8 January 2006, 10:41 PM

When I read the first post, I thought exactly the same thing as Paul - why spend time changing straps when you should be enjoying Hawaii? Take the YM, wear it with anything without worrying about it and focus on enjoying your holiday, mate!

BruceS · 8 January 2006, 11:54 PM

My vote is to just wear the YM

9 January 2006, 02:27 AM

I voted to take 2, but I am going against the grain a bit here to suggest that you leave the YM at home and take the others. Here's my logic:

The YM you know and love already, and you are still somewhat unsure of the UN from what I gather. I would say take the UN for the purpose of spending some time with it to really understand if this is your 3rd wheel. The only reason I even suggest taking the 88 along is it's versatility with the straps - you can make it look like whatever you need to suit the occasion.

ralphieralph · 9 January 2006, 02:40 AM

Daren, im with bruce,take the YM.

Besides that way you'll get a chance to miss the other ones..

Rockrolex · 9 January 2006, 04:33 AM

I had to go with "Take 2". I tend to do that when I travel, because I like to be able to switch off now and then. As for which two, that's tougher. I would probably take the UN and the PAM. The UN because it is still new and deserves some serious wrist time. And it would be fun to time the flights. I do that when I wear my chronos on the plane.

The PAM because of the second time zone. It saves me from having to do the calculations to figure out what time it is back home.

I've got a similar problem. I'm already trying to decide which watch(es) to take to London next month. At this point, I'm leaning toward the GMT and the Breitling. The GMT because it is my favorite, especially for travel due to the second time zone, and the Breitling because I am really enjoying it and it will be fun to time the flights.

Ah, decisions, decisions. Would that all of life's decisions were this tough.

Launch Mini · 9 January 2006, 04:58 AM

YM hands down.
My pet peeve is "wet straps" after wearing in the water. Also, the annoyance of washing your strap after the ocean water. Not worth it.
The YM was made for this trip.

Subfiend · 9 January 2006, 08:27 AM

Do you see a Panny or UN in this picture? I rest my case.

Launch Mini · 9 January 2006, 09:35 AM

She's wearing a watch??????

mailman · 9 January 2006, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Launch Mini

She's wearing a watch??????

Yeah looks like a Plat/SS YM. I noticed cuz I'd have to bag her head or flip her over. The rest of her ain't bad. Whaddya think Johnny?

dman · 9 January 2006, 12:32 PM

Seems like a compelling reason Dave.

9 January 2006, 11:37 PM

I'm with Al and Ed on this one. Take the UN and the PAM for the reasons they stated. I'm sure you'll see TONS of Rolex in Hawaii, so don't take it cuz you know it's the permanent fixture in your collection. The UN needs a good test and can work as your 'dress' watch, while the PAM has the GMT feature and is also an excellent watch for the water.

Pretty simple to me.

BTW Paul, I agree.

JIM- · 10 January 2006, 10:44 AM

YM for sure.

You may sell the others so no use risking any scratches, but you'll never sell the YM.

JJ Irani · 10 January 2006, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIM

YM for sure.

You may sell the others so no use risking any scratches, but you'll never sell the YM.

Good point, Jim....you're a bloody genius!!

View Poll Results: Which to take???????
YM	8	40.00%
UN Chrono	1	5.00%
Panerai 88	4	20.00%
Take two	5	25.00%
It's Hawaii, who the hell needs a watch? :-)	2	10.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

8 January 2006, 12:51 PM	#1
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	OKAY TRFites, Give me your thoughts.... ...I have done this in the past and always liked the feedback and thoughts. So let's try this again. First off, this is for fun, so keep the wear whatever comments in your head. Dylan and I leave for Hawaii in less than two weeks and I am undecided as to which watch to take. I have the YM which of course can take the water and anything I throw at it, plus it has some subtle bling to it. And afterall it is a Rolex. The UN Chrono, very unique and also a bit of bling. Rated to 100m so no worries in the water either. Maybe I can time how long the flight takes. Or the 88, I have tons of straps I could take so the look would be different. I have a rubber and a cormaid velcro strap plus waterproof leather straps. And the obvious with this one, it tracks multi time zones, although I can usually add or subtract four hours from my home time. But for fun, let me know which one to take. I may take two, but I doubt it. Also, don't just vote, give me a little feedback as to why. Let's hear it. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

8 January 2006, 03:03 PM	#2
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	This is a no-brainer, Daren. The YM in the blink of an eye. I wouldn't risk taking the new UN nor the Panny. For a place like Hawaii with all the surf, sun and sand...all you need is a Rolex....and the sunset!!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

8 January 2006, 09:12 PM	#7
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	Ok dman, here's my thoughts. I voted take two. Now which two? I say the YM is a no brainer. Since it's the new bie to your collection, you can take the UN and give it a good amount of wrist time. The 88 you can take because of the options you have with it, straps, bracelet. Another thing, do you want to be monkeying around changing straps on vacation? I know it's not a big deal but it is vacation. I like it the best on the bracelet. As JJ said CRACKER. That is my favorite looking Pam. So anyway, you asked, there's my .02. __________________ JJ

8 January 2006, 10:41 PM	#8
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	When I read the first post, I thought exactly the same thing as Paul - why spend time changing straps when you should be enjoying Hawaii? Take the YM, wear it with anything without worrying about it and focus on enjoying your holiday, mate! __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

8 January 2006, 11:54 PM	#9
BruceS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Sir Daft Location: Cornwall, UK Watch: Too many Posts: 2,464	My vote is to just wear the YM

9 January 2006, 02:27 AM	#10
---- Guest Posts: n/a	I voted to take 2, but I am going against the grain a bit here to suggest that you leave the YM at home and take the others. Here's my logic: The YM you know and love already, and you are still somewhat unsure of the UN from what I gather. I would say take the UN for the purpose of spending some time with it to really understand if this is your 3rd wheel. The only reason I even suggest taking the 88 along is it's versatility with the straps - you can make it look like whatever you need to suit the occasion.

9 January 2006, 02:40 AM	#11
ralphieralph "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Real Name: Ahh..."LEROY" Location: connecticut Watch: SUBMARINER Posts: 681	Daren, im with bruce,take the YM. Besides that way you'll get a chance to miss the other ones..

9 January 2006, 04:33 AM	#12
Rockrolex TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: God Location: Washington, D.C. Watch: What do you think? Posts: 37,966	I had to go with "Take 2". I tend to do that when I travel, because I like to be able to switch off now and then. As for which two, that's tougher. I would probably take the UN and the PAM. The UN because it is still new and deserves some serious wrist time. And it would be fun to time the flights. I do that when I wear my chronos on the plane. The PAM because of the second time zone. It saves me from having to do the calculations to figure out what time it is back home. I've got a similar problem. I'm already trying to decide which watch(es) to take to London next month. At this point, I'm leaning toward the GMT and the Breitling. The GMT because it is my favorite, especially for travel due to the second time zone, and the Breitling because I am really enjoying it and it will be fun to time the flights. Ah, decisions, decisions. Would that all of life's decisions were this tough. __________________ Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. *Tosser Cabinet Member* Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019

9 January 2006, 04:58 AM	#13
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	YM hands down. My pet peeve is "wet straps" after wearing in the water. Also, the annoyance of washing your strap after the ocean water. Not worth it. The YM was made for this trip.

9 January 2006, 08:27 AM	#14
Subfiend "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Outside Watch: Isn't it obvious? Posts: 1,926	Do you see a Panny or UN in this picture? I rest my case. __________________ Subfiend

9 January 2006, 09:35 AM	#15
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	She's wearing a watch??????

9 January 2006, 12:32 PM	#17
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	Seems like a compelling reason Dave. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

9 January 2006, 11:37 PM	#18
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	I'm with Al and Ed on this one. Take the UN and the PAM for the reasons they stated. I'm sure you'll see TONS of Rolex in Hawaii, so don't take it cuz you know it's the permanent fixture in your collection. The UN needs a good test and can work as your 'dress' watch, while the PAM has the GMT feature and is also an excellent watch for the water. Pretty simple to me. BTW Paul, I agree.

10 January 2006, 10:44 AM	#19
JIM- Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 599	YM for sure. You may sell the others so no use risking any scratches, but you'll never sell the YM. Last edited by JIM-; 10 January 2006 at 10:45 AM..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)