ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
1 July 2014, 01:22 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 94
|
opinions on Hublot watches over Rolexes
Hi everyone.
I am thinking of purchasing a Hublot Big Bang 44mm Aero Bang. I am currently have a datejust YG presidential from 1987, 16610 sub and the Hulk. I am thinking a Hublot will be a great addition to my collection. What are your opinion on Hublot Big Bang watches? |
1 July 2014, 01:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I think they are over priced as a whole, especially for the ETA movement pieces. I'm also not a huge fan of the aesthetics.
|
1 July 2014, 01:32 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 94
|
|
1 July 2014, 05:45 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
|
5 August 2014, 04:57 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
|
1 July 2014, 01:26 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Hublot are expensive for what they are IMHO, ETA movements, really chunky designs. To me more sizzle then steak. Fine horology lies with other manufacturers, fine fashion and flash is where Hublot comes in. Again JMHO
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
1 July 2014, 01:40 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Hublot are a current fashion trend and a popular look..
Big watches with an even bigger profit margin that any vendor can sell. You can even get Hublot on Amazon. The question is wrong though. It would never be "Hublot over Rolex", as if there were some competition here, or even a basis for comparison.. Rolex doesn't remotely look like a Hublot and Hublot will never have the cache' that Rolex enjoys; Hublot has only been around since 1980 !! If you like the look and don't mind the price, get a Hublot, they may still be around in a few decades, maybe not..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
1 July 2014, 05:35 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
yes, Hublot is nice just like Rolexes
unfortunately you will get not many hublot fans on this website. this website stick to AP again, Panerai again, and especially Rolex (I know i love rolex very much). I have Hublot Unico, I have AP, many Rolex, Panerai etc, and Hublot Unico quality are SIMPLY AMAZING. The aerobang is the watch i wanna buy before, but changes into the Unico since it is better look, in house, flyback etc. If you want to buy Hublot, I would say to buy it. Dont listen to the people who dont have the watch. I have the watch so I know the quality. Their service its also very nice. My recomendation is to get Hublot Unico ASAP. dont get the aerobang, aerobang is the model of 2008, but I know their design is nice. Get the Unico, if you have the budget get the GOLD one. but if you dont have the budget, the titanium is ok |
5 August 2014, 04:55 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
http://www.hublot.com/en/ |
|
5 August 2014, 06:20 AM | #10 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Quote:
I however do not, and I certainly wouldn't listen to a "diving circle" that talked about Hublot with any seriousness. JMHO
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
|
5 August 2014, 06:32 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
[QUOTE=wantonebad;5152923]Glad you like them!
Not especially, mate. Just being sociable with the op. |
1 July 2014, 01:29 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
|
Its just another watch same as Rolex. Its just a matter of what you like. If it fits your style, go for it. Value is all subjective. A this point in time, I find Rolex grossly overpriced given their prices have greatly out paced inflation rates for basically the same watch of 30 years ago.
The ETA movement is a plus since it can be serviced by any competent watch maker and there always be parts. 100 years from now when your grand kids have your watches, I bet any ETA movement will be easier to service. You may not even be ale to get any old Rolex parts since they make no parts commitment for older movements.
__________________
|
1 July 2014, 03:00 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
|
5 August 2014, 06:50 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Ditto. For an oversized odd-looking fashion watch I'd just buy an Invicta and save a lot of money. But I'm not avant-garde with watches.
|
1 July 2014, 01:33 AM | #15 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
|
Hublot just doesn't appeal to me.
|
1 July 2014, 01:33 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
No, they have some in house as well, but you are going to pay even more! Again, if you like it, buy it! That's why we have so many choices!
|
1 July 2014, 02:05 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,157
|
Their Classic Fusion line looks nice to me but the Aero Bang with the skeletonized face isn't my style. Obviously, what you like is most important to you. That being said, I think in that general price range, I'd much rather have an AP Royal Oak Offshore if you're looking more along the lines of sporty chronograph.
|
1 July 2014, 02:43 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
|
Not my cup of tea. Sorry.
|
1 July 2014, 08:04 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Not a big fan
|
1 July 2014, 08:16 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
If you like it then why not? There are many watch brands, and no reason not to enjoy whichever you like
__________________
|
2 July 2014, 01:47 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
|
1 July 2014, 08:59 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Go for an AP ROO instead, Diver or Panda, much more substantive than a Hublot imho.
|
1 July 2014, 09:22 AM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
Buy what you like.
Myself, hublot currently falls on my do not buy list. I do not care for their designs. They will be selling for 3-5 grand a piece like franc mullers in 10 years IMHO. Okay so that's a bit of hyperbole
__________________
|
1 July 2014, 09:42 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
I'd be more proud wearing a Seiko, but that's just me.
|
1 July 2014, 10:44 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
|
Personally I have no use for them.
__________________
"You, you and you, panic . . . the rest of you follow me!" Unknown Gunnery Sergeant, Vietnam 1966. Rolex, Sub 126610LN Omega Seamaster 300M Diver, Doxa Sub 200 Tudor Black Bay Bronze, Tudor Pelagos, (Blue). |
1 July 2014, 11:29 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
Look into an Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore, much higher pedigree, and you won't take nearly the bath when it comes time to sell it.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
1 July 2014, 12:33 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
|
1 July 2014, 12:08 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
|
At an extremely discounted price, I would consider getting one as some of their designs are quite fashionable and avant garde. But anything close to retail prices I'd skip it and go for a Rolex.
|
17 August 2014, 01:27 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: PR - FL
Watch: SD43/DJ41
Posts: 151
|
|
1 July 2014, 01:18 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Some Hublot's are ok...if you like it, get it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.