ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

MrJ320 · 6 July 2014, 04:08 AM

I know the watches are very different, but lately the Omega dark side of the moon has really caught my eye, and really conflicted as to whether I should sell my 233K dot dial to fund it. I consider the 233 to be one of Panerai's modern classics, and my only manual wind watch.

But the DSotM is just so well constructed, and I really like the all ceramic construction (including pushers, crown, and dial), and both the polished and brushed effects on the watch. It also has a great in-house movement, just like the 233.

Unfortunately I can't keep the 233 and get the DSotM, so if you are in my position, would you sell the 233? Appreciate everyone's input and thoughts.

Will also post in the Omega sub-forum to see how the reactions differ

fullcourt · 6 July 2014, 06:01 AM

nope

soho · 6 July 2014, 06:57 AM

It sounds like you really like you 233, so no. The DSOTM is very impressive though, and I can see why you like it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ELITEVIDEOGAMES · 6 July 2014, 07:15 AM

I think the 233 is a classic and the DSOTM is just a new interpretation of the classic speed master and may not hold its luster in time. With that said the dark side does look great so do what you like!

gougy · 6 July 2014, 07:19 AM

Have you tried the Omega on your wrist? Adorable for someone but can be too flashy too. Well actually exactly like your PAM. Tough call. I am afraid I can not help. What about the chrono, do you have one in your collection? But then again - the PAM movement is gorgeous. You need both, they are so different ;)

MrJ320 · 6 July 2014, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gougy

Have you tried the Omega on your wrist? Adorable for someone but can be too flashy too. Well actually exactly like your PAM. Tough call. I am afraid I can not help. What about the chrono, do you have one in your collection? But then again - the PAM movement is gorgeous. You need both, they are so different ;)

It's been quite difficult to track down a DSotM at the ADs in town, and so haven't had a chance to try it in person yet. I agree I do want to see it in person to see how "shiny" the polished ceramic bezel, case and dial would be. Being able to own both the 233 and the DSotM would definitely be the best case scenario, but unfortunately not possible so thus the dilemma.

I think I do need to find one to try on in person.

Kobayashi · 6 July 2014, 07:20 AM

I love everything about TDSOTM.....except the price. I was offered a 10% discount BNIB and I probably could've negotiated more. But I walked away. Tough choice as both are great watches.

MrJ320 · 6 July 2014, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobayashi

I love everything about TDSOTM.....except the price. I was offered a 10% discount BNIB and I probably could've negotiated more. But I walked away. Tough choice as both are great watches.

Great wrist shot! I agree the price of the DSotM is quite high, and one of the reasons I am hesitant on picking one up as well.

In terms of thickness would you consider the DSotM to be comparable to a Panerai or is it even thicker?

Kobayashi · 6 July 2014, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrJ320

Great wrist shot! I agree the price of the DSotM is quite high, and one of the reasons I am hesitant on picking one up as well.

In terms of thickness would you consider the DSotM to be comparable to a Panerai or is it even thicker?

My preference is for slim, low profile watches and while this wasn't ultra thin I didn't notice the thickness so for me that meant it was a perfect fit as I have 6 1/2inch wrists. The ceramic is very shiny and I think part of what appeals about this watch. I couldn't help being mesmerized the entire time. But at $10k plus I can't justify the expense when there are others in that price range I'd rather have. Best of luck!

MrJ320 · 7 July 2014, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobayashi

My preference is for slim, low profile watches and while this wasn't ultra thin I didn't notice the thickness so for me that meant it was a perfect fit as I have 6 1/2inch wrists. The ceramic is very shiny and I think part of what appeals about this watch. I couldn't help being mesmerized the entire time. But at $10k plus I can't justify the expense when there are others in that price range I'd rather have. Best of luck!

Good to know as I have a 6.5" wrist as well. Yes, I think the shiny ceramic is the main attraction for me to the DSotM. Need to find one to try on!

Cru Jones · 6 July 2014, 07:23 AM

Both are really awesome. Go with your gut. Personally, the 8-day manual + GMT + dome + strap madness pushes the needle to the 233. Buuuuut, if I really really wanted the DSOTM, I would at least consider the trade if I could stretch the budget and add a 000.

Urosfan · 6 July 2014, 07:38 AM

I'd keep the 233

kilyung · 6 July 2014, 09:28 AM

Tough call... Both are nice.

jamesr · 6 July 2014, 11:59 AM

not a chance, keep the 233

sebastien1975 · 6 July 2014, 12:08 PM

I would also seriously consider

Alfredo. · 6 July 2014, 01:54 PM

I would honestly flip it for the DSOM. I saw it the other day in person and it looks amazing. The feel of the strap and the look of the movement is very nice. I would visit and AD to take a look at both watches together and it will make whatever decision you take a whole lot easier.

jay_man2 · 6 July 2014, 03:34 PM

I tried on a DSoTM at the local Omega Boutique last weekend. It's thinner than my 164, 351 or 005, but thicker than my Radiomir.

htc8p · 6 July 2014, 04:05 PM

Since I cant choose both I would go with the dsom watch because it is ceramic and long warranty

MP5 · 6 July 2014, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay_man2

I tried on a DSoTM at the local Omega Boutique last weekend. It's thinner than my 164, 351 or 005, but thicker than my Radiomir.

I dont know if it felt that way but the 005 and 164 are documented thinner by quite a margin

jay_man2 · 6 July 2014, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MP5

I dont know if it felt that way but the 005 and 164 are documented thinner by quite a margin

I guess the lighter weight helped create the illusion that it was a thinner piece.

Auto16610 · 7 July 2014, 02:25 AM

All day long! An iconic piece that has a way more higher "cool" factor.

Psmith · 7 July 2014, 03:51 AM

I would keep the 233 but then I'm not much of an Omega fan

gotmpower · 7 July 2014, 04:12 AM

No

One Ping Only · 7 July 2014, 04:30 AM

I might do it. The DSOM is great in person and on the wrist. The 233 is perhaps "the" modern Panerai, but it's not like they won't be available if you change your mind, or want to have both in the future.

B. Doggy · 7 July 2014, 05:40 AM

Personally, no. 233 is nice...

Dom · 7 July 2014, 11:01 AM

233 for me. Omega have moved up market though. Prices just faster than the watches reputation.

KellyM3 · 7 July 2014, 12:42 PM

No

alexlt730512 · 7 July 2014, 02:59 PM

no way

zlin08033 · 8 July 2014, 01:12 AM

No.

drivenlifestyle · 10 July 2014, 04:14 PM

233!

6 July 2014, 04:08 AM	#1
MrJ320 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: James Location: Toronto Watch: IG: @j.project Posts: 2,194	Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon? I know the watches are very different, but lately the Omega dark side of the moon has really caught my eye, and really conflicted as to whether I should sell my 233K dot dial to fund it. I consider the 233 to be one of Panerai's modern classics, and my only manual wind watch. But the DSotM is just so well constructed, and I really like the all ceramic construction (including pushers, crown, and dial), and both the polished and brushed effects on the watch. It also has a great in-house movement, just like the 233. Unfortunately I can't keep the 233 and get the DSotM, so if you are in my position, would you sell the 233? Appreciate everyone's input and thoughts. Will also post in the Omega sub-forum to see how the reactions differ

6 July 2014, 06:01 AM	#2
fullcourt "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: dp Location: chicago, usa Watch: panerai Posts: 2,369	nope __________________ dp just living the dream chicago, usa chgo_risti on IG

6 July 2014, 06:57 AM	#3
soho 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Planet Earth Watch: Varies Posts: 2,057	Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon? It sounds like you really like you 233, so no. The DSOTM is very impressive though, and I can see why you like it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 July 2014, 07:20 AM	#7
Kobayashi "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Michael Location: SF Bay Area Watch: Any Rolex! Posts: 1,060	Would you sell 233 for a Dark Side of the Moon? I love everything about TDSOTM.....except the price. I was offered a 10% discount BNIB and I probably could've negotiated more. But I walked away. Tough choice as both are great watches.

6 July 2014, 01:54 PM	#16
Alfredo. "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Margaritaville Posts: 3,639	I would honestly flip it for the DSOM. I saw it the other day in person and it looks amazing. The feel of the strap and the look of the movement is very nice. I would visit and AD to take a look at both watches together and it will make whatever decision you take a whole lot easier. __________________ After reading all posts, I agree with Adam!

6 July 2014, 07:15 AM	#4
ELITEVIDEOGAMES "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Tom Location: Long Island NY Watch: me sell games Posts: 1,898	I think the 233 is a classic and the DSOTM is just a new interpretation of the classic speed master and may not hold its luster in time. With that said the dark side does look great so do what you like!

6 July 2014, 07:19 AM	#5
gougy Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Prague, Czech rep Watch: one on my wrist Posts: 242	Have you tried the Omega on your wrist? Adorable for someone but can be too flashy too. Well actually exactly like your PAM. Tough call. I am afraid I can not help. What about the chrono, do you have one in your collection? But then again - the PAM movement is gorgeous. You need both, they are so different ;)

6 July 2014, 07:23 AM	#11
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	Both are really awesome. Go with your gut. Personally, the 8-day manual + GMT + dome + strap madness pushes the needle to the 233. Buuuuut, if I really really wanted the DSOTM, I would at least consider the trade if I could stretch the budget and add a 000.

6 July 2014, 07:38 AM	#12
Urosfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: NYC Watch: Me now Posts: 19,372	I'd keep the 233

6 July 2014, 09:28 AM	#13
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	Tough call... Both are nice.

6 July 2014, 11:59 AM	#14
jamesr "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: James R. Location: IL Watch: 1675 Posts: 32	not a chance, keep the 233

6 July 2014, 12:08 PM	#15
sebastien1975 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Sebastien Location: South East Asia Posts: 788	I would also seriously consider

6 July 2014, 03:34 PM	#17
jay_man2 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Jay Location: Northern Virginia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,490	I tried on a DSoTM at the local Omega Boutique last weekend. It's thinner than my 164, 351 or 005, but thicker than my Radiomir.

6 July 2014, 04:05 PM	#18
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,472	Since I cant choose both I would go with the dsom watch because it is ceramic and long warranty

7 July 2014, 02:25 AM	#21
Auto16610 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Scott Location: Santa Cruz Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai Posts: 1,182	233! All day long! An iconic piece that has a way more higher "cool" factor.

7 July 2014, 03:51 AM	#22
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	I would keep the 233 but then I'm not much of an Omega fan __________________

7 July 2014, 04:12 AM	#23
gotmpower "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Rich Location: S.F Posts: 271	No

7 July 2014, 04:30 AM	#24
One Ping Only "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ken Location: WI Watch: several Posts: 1,639	I might do it. The DSOM is great in person and on the wrist. The 233 is perhaps "the" modern Panerai, but it's not like they won't be available if you change your mind, or want to have both in the future. __________________ I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.

7 July 2014, 05:40 AM	#25
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Personally, no. 233 is nice... __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

7 July 2014, 11:01 AM	#26
Dom "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Dominik Location: Zürich Watch: Rolex, Patek, FPJ Posts: 381	233 for me. Omega have moved up market though. Prices just faster than the watches reputation.

7 July 2014, 12:42 PM	#27
KellyM3 Banned Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Attleboro mass Posts: 209	No

7 July 2014, 02:59 PM	#28
alexlt730512 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,248	no way

8 July 2014, 01:12 AM	#29
zlin08033 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PA Posts: 1,034	No.

10 July 2014, 04:14 PM	#30
drivenlifestyle Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Ryan Location: Los Angeles Watch: PAM 171 Posts: 347	233!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)