ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sydneysider · 25 July 2014, 08:06 PM

They look interesting but they don't seem to be in Australia - would be interested in throughts and photos.

And · 26 July 2014, 03:36 AM

I've had one for about three years.

For a no bling, hard as nails tool watch it's hard to beat. The case is amazing. Mine has no scratch marks, scuffs or swirls whatsoever, despite being banged on many hard objects. It is seriously tough.

I love the white hands and numbers. Mine keeps great time, within three seconds a day (although not as consistent in timekeeping as my other automatics).

But.... I never wear it anymore. It has one weakness for me. The lume is ordinary. It is C1 superluminova which gives a nice white finish during daylight but disappoints in the dark. I'm a bit of a lume whore (I'm even slightly disappointed with my SubC's lume) and I've replaced the watch in my rotation by a Doxa Sub. I may re-lume it to C3 one day in which case you wouldn't get it off my wrist.

Name: image.jpg
Views: 170
Size: 87.2 KB

Name: image.jpg
Views: 170
Size: 87.2 KB

Attachment 516499

And · 26 July 2014, 03:37 AM

Name: image.jpg
Views: 174
Size: 79.4 KB

Blue September · 2 December 2015, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by And

Attachment 516507

Nice strap! What sort? I love the simplicity.
Jas

wantonebad · 26 July 2014, 04:19 AM

Too thick for me, JMHO

And · 26 July 2014, 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wantonebad

Too thick for me, JMHO

Yes it is thick.

Another shot:

Name: image.jpg
Views: 168
Size: 100.5 KB

stockae92 · 26 July 2014, 06:30 AM

I've owned a DC66 chronograph for a short period of time. The watch didn't stayed with me for too long because the watch looked bigger (and very flat) than the 42mm case would suggest. And the lume was less than satisfactory. Otherwise, the spec looks great on paper and seems to be a great tool watch.

sydneysider · 26 July 2014, 07:52 AM

The thickness is my main concern, I can easily handle a 40mm dial but I've got a skinny wrist so I reckon it'd look ridiculous, it's interesting you pick up on this point. I love the look and it seems great bang for the buck but alas I think the thickness is a killer blow.

Nice photos!

25 July 2014, 08:06 PM	#1
sydneysider "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Graeme Location: Sydney Watch: Tudor Sub S/flake Posts: 40	Anyone own a Damasko DC56? They look interesting but they don't seem to be in Australia - would be interested in throughts and photos.

26 July 2014, 03:36 AM	#2
And "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Andy Location: Beds Watch: Speedmaster Posts: 198	I've had one for about three years. For a no bling, hard as nails tool watch it's hard to beat. The case is amazing. Mine has no scratch marks, scuffs or swirls whatsoever, despite being banged on many hard objects. It is seriously tough. I love the white hands and numbers. Mine keeps great time, within three seconds a day (although not as consistent in timekeeping as my other automatics). But.... I never wear it anymore. It has one weakness for me. The lume is ordinary. It is C1 superluminova which gives a nice white finish during daylight but disappoints in the dark. I'm a bit of a lume whore (I'm even slightly disappointed with my SubC's lume) and I've replaced the watch in my rotation by a Doxa Sub. I may re-lume it to C3 one day in which case you wouldn't get it off my wrist. Attachment 516499 __________________ Truth is singular. Its "versions" are mistruths. - Sonmi 451

26 July 2014, 03:37 AM	#3
And "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Andy Location: Beds Watch: Speedmaster Posts: 198	__________________ Truth is singular. Its "versions" are mistruths. - Sonmi 451

26 July 2014, 04:19 AM	#5
wantonebad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: USA Watch: 126600, 116500LN Posts: 12,849	Too thick for me, JMHO __________________ "I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego"

26 July 2014, 06:30 AM	#7
stockae92 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Socal Posts: 4,964	I've owned a DC66 chronograph for a short period of time. The watch didn't stayed with me for too long because the watch looked bigger (and very flat) than the 42mm case would suggest. And the lume was less than satisfactory. Otherwise, the spec looks great on paper and seems to be a great tool watch. __________________ 135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R

26 July 2014, 07:52 AM	#8
sydneysider "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: Graeme Location: Sydney Watch: Tudor Sub S/flake Posts: 40	The thickness is my main concern, I can easily handle a 40mm dial but I've got a skinny wrist so I reckon it'd look ridiculous, it's interesting you pick up on this point. I love the look and it seems great bang for the buck but alas I think the thickness is a killer blow. Nice photos!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)