ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
2 October 2014, 06:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
I cannot decide, subc no date or explorer 1
I love both, can only have one, I'm a hairstylist, love the classic style of the sub no date, love the minimalism of the explorer1, I want something I can beat up and not worry about it. Sub is more sporty where as explorer is more dressy...
Help any thoughts ? |
2 October 2014, 06:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I have owned both and the Submariner would be my pick.
The Explorer is a fantastic watch, but there is just something about a Sub:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
2 October 2014, 06:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Sub C is more versatile IMO. I have one and I could easily where it every day every where. The E1 is a great watch, but it's too subtle sometimes.
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
2 October 2014, 06:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
Subc
|
2 October 2014, 06:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mexico City
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 262
|
I would go for the SubC
|
2 October 2014, 06:56 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: john
Location: ireland
Watch: Rolex ,PP
Posts: 701
|
I had a exp 1 ,for 9 months ,,, beautiful watch , just something missing , hard to discribe really ,, traded it for sub nd. ,, couldnt be happier ,, no regrets
|
2 October 2014, 07:02 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 266
|
I have both (Sub 5513 + Explorer 114270) and so should you!
|
2 October 2014, 07:08 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,417
|
I wouldn't hesitate...Get the Sub!
|
2 October 2014, 07:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
Explorer.
|
2 October 2014, 07:18 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
|
Sub c is a dive watch. Don't get it if you don't dive. The Explorer is a classic all-around timepiece, and built to take punishment. It's perfect.
|
2 October 2014, 09:25 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
2 October 2014, 11:21 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Jim
Location: Chicago
Posts: 253
|
|
3 October 2014, 04:52 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
Quote:
hate to argue ,,, but the sub certainly isnt a dive watch ,,, its a watch styled like a divers watch ,,, nothing costing 5k plus could ever be thought of as a dive watch , its a watch for looking great and timing parking meters with. having said that ,,, you dont need to be an explorer to own one of them either ,,, this rolex thing is so tricky to justify ,,, lol ,,, |
|
2 October 2014, 07:27 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of Adventure
Watch: Guess?
Posts: 461
|
<----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 October 2014, 07:27 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
If you want people to know you're wearing a Rolex, go for the Sub. The Explorer is far more subtle. In terms of sporty or dressy, they're equal. I recommend the Explorer because there are likely to be far, far fewer of them. I wonder what the numbers are...?
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
4 October 2014, 04:24 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
I went with the Explorer and have been very happy with it. I wear it everyday no matter what I'm going to be doing. Nobody notices I'm wearing a Rolex and I like it that way.
__________________
I plan on living forever...so far, so good ♛ |
|
2 October 2014, 07:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
size ,,,,, try both , think for a while , buy the one you cant put down ,,,, buy pre owned and you may just be able to stretch both for the price of either new ,,, or a little more ,, hows that for an idea
|
2 October 2014, 07:34 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
|
Spot on.
__________________
Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520 |
2 October 2014, 07:36 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 350
|
SubC first and then the Explorer 1.
|
2 October 2014, 07:50 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
SubC easily.
|
2 October 2014, 07:56 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7
|
I have the same problem every morning...😎
Now seriously, both are icons, blend perfectly in any environment and are heavy duty tool watches so whatever you decide you will be happy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2014, 07:59 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PNW USA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 516
|
I've personally had both and I've personally sold both.
Sorry i'm no help lol |
2 October 2014, 08:10 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal & Jakarta
Watch: ROLEX, AP, and PP
Posts: 916
|
Sub c no date
|
2 October 2014, 08:12 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Either is a fantastic choice
|
2 October 2014, 08:16 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: robday
Location: Texas
Watch: 16710 GMT Coke
Posts: 105
|
Ok, so not trying to be silly here, but as a hairstylist, you may at some time or another need to use the bezel on the Sub to check on elapsed time (under dryer; since applying color; etc), especially if you have multiple clients at once...just a thought.
|
3 October 2014, 01:30 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,037
|
Pretty good point here. Bezel could come in handy.
|
2 October 2014, 08:18 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
I vote Sub, but I'm considering the Exp I as my next.
|
2 October 2014, 08:20 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gone
Posts: 217
|
Explorer hands down. Larger dial, wears flatter, and dresses up more nicely than a sub.
|
2 October 2014, 09:23 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Willie
Location: Parkland,Fl.
Posts: 4,829
|
Sub
|
2 October 2014, 09:32 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: colin
Location: Maryland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 287
|
Sub
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.