ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
2 October 2014, 12:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
|
"Googling" this random serial number thing . . .
Just not impressed. (I'm sure Rolex is concerned)
For me, being able to date a watch adds to the historicity of the brand. It gives the brand's reputation weight. Why would Rolex care if some consider a watch from one year better than another year. They've already sold the watch. Say a dealer has a random numbered watch that for some reason does not sell for 5 years or he puts one in the safe for himself for several years, falls out of love with it and puts it out for sell looking exactly like the one next to it that came in yesterday. Is it possible this "new/old" watch now has lubricants that are several years old and the customer may need to service it much sooner. Don't know diddly about lubricants but it seems that if its not being used, just sitting, oozing into another position due to gravity that maybe that's not a good thing when it finally gets running. And the argument that randomizing discourages fakes. A faker can't randomize a serial number? Really? As someone who is giving very serious consideration to purchasing, how does this benefit Rolex or the Rolex brand? |
2 October 2014, 12:37 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
The case number never gave you the year of manufacture. It's good for Rolex because it's good for their AD network. It's not so much to allow them to sell a 7 year old watch as brand spankin' new as it is simply to be able to sell an X serial once the Y serial is introduced. Everyone wants the one they think is newer, as though these things have a "sell by" date like milk.
Moreover, it gives Rolex a lot more permutations (many years) before they have to rethink the serial number format again. A watch can still be dated by the original bill of sale, warranty card, or service records. These are more accurate in fact than the serial number ever was, understanding that as for as Rolex is concerned a watch's life begins the day it's sold.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
2 October 2014, 12:37 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
It's part of the charm.
|
2 October 2014, 12:44 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
"Googling" this random serial number thing . . .
As was already stated you can't really date a watch by SN. All the charts are just estimates. What benefit does rolex gain from having "non-random" series numbers? Now they can print a bunch of cases and sell until the model changes without having someone who saw a chart on the internet complain to an AD.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2014, 02:11 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
It's a brave new world!
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
2 October 2014, 05:28 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
Rolex does what Rolex wants.
The bottom line is, don't let a serial number discourage you from your watch purchase. |
2 October 2014, 06:52 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
I am a fan of the new random serial numbers. I know it's very impractical and some identification is needed, but in my ideal world, there would be no serial number at all and everything would come down to condition and service history only.
|
3 October 2014, 12:22 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
OT: I'm not sure "historicity" is the right word. Whether you can date a watch or not has no bearing on the historical authenticity of the Rolex brand.
|
3 October 2014, 12:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Darrin
Location: All Along The
Watch: tower
Posts: 197
|
I'm with the OP. In 25 years vintage collectors won't be too happy trying to date watches that don't have accompanying papers. I want to know what year (as close as one can tell) a watch was made. I wish they'd go back to some type of non-random system.
|
3 October 2014, 02:20 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Quote:
But aside from the papers, in the vintage market there oftwn seems to be slight variations Rolex makes to it's models here and there over time: the dial, font, text spacing, date wheel, lug holes, SELs, engraved rehaut...yada yada. The vintage guys around here are pretty savvy about all the little changes that occurred along the way. True even with the new models, I think. Take the current GMTC for example. The color of the lume will help place the age of the watch as newer or older. But to an extent I do see your point with vintage pieces. I suppose Rolex wasn't thinking 50 years ahead on this.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
|
3 October 2014, 02:42 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
simple, by an older watch, get it serviced and it's really yours for ever...
20140816_103247_resized_1.jpg |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.