The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 November 2014, 10:01 AM   #1
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
114060 and SD4000

Anyone here who owns both? I love my Sub but can't take the SD out of my mind, I don't think I could part with my Sub but I am not sure its a good idea having both. Any thoughts? What would you rather have Sub or SD or both ;)
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:03 AM   #2
Evad3
"TRF" Member
 
Evad3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Dave
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Watch: 14060m/216570
Posts: 773
IMO they are much too similar to have both. I would keep your 114060 and go for something else!
Evad3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:52 AM   #3
rolex_DateJust
2024 Pledge Member
 
rolex_DateJust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Sergio
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Yes please!
Posts: 1,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evad3 View Post
IMO they are much too similar to have both. I would keep your 114060 and go for something else!
+1. keep one and fund a different one
__________________
♛ 126610LV ♛ 16220 Salmon ♛ 126713GRNR ♛ 18238 Ω Speedmaster Moonwatch
rolex_DateJust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:26 AM   #4
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Very different. Get it!
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:34 AM   #5
REFZ
"TRF" Member
 
REFZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Martin
Location: Netherlands
Watch: The Rolex Way
Posts: 1,471
I own both models and they are my only two Rolex watches.
It's often said that they look similar but they are definately not the same watches.
__________________
114060 - 116520 - 126334
REFZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:53 AM   #6
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by REFZ View Post
I own both models and they are my only two Rolex watches.
It's often said that they look similar but they are definately not the same watches.
Is it too much to ask for a side by side pic 😄?

Tks
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:56 AM   #7
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
.
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 10:44 AM   #8
h999r
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
Love the SD 4000 better, rather have either one but not both, theyre look alike.
h999r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:10 AM   #9
captkevin
"TRF" Member
 
captkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: Subs
Posts: 689
Would love to have both, but if only one it's the seadweller for me
captkevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:13 AM   #10
swils8610
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swils8610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
I've owned both...still have the SD4000. I prefer the smaller and trimmer lugs of the SD4000. I also need a date function.
swils8610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:21 AM   #11
dukerules
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
Love both, but slightly prefer the 114060.
__________________

Instagram: dukerules
dukerules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:23 AM   #12
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
One or the other, but I'd keep your Sub, it has all the heft and wrist presence you need. It's durable, reliable, versatile and iconic. Only on this this site will you get the pitch about how different they are, how you can and should have both. In the real world, they are indistinguishable.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:29 AM   #13
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
I like the fact that the Sea-Dweller is not as common as a Sub. and I like to go sans Cyclops from time to time :-)
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:29 AM   #14
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Depends on if you have other Rolexes. If not then I would say yes.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:29 AM   #15
BonitaBeast
"TRF" Member
 
BonitaBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NJ / Philippines
Posts: 189
If I were to choose one, SD4000 for me. I prefer the smaller lugs and thicker case and crystal. If you can keep both do so. They are two very different watches. Many will say they are too much alike but I'm sure you know they are very different on the wrist. Plus, an SD is still an SD 😉


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
BonitaBeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 01:56 PM   #16
joejoe1225
"TRF" Member
 
joejoe1225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
I own both - I just got the 114060 today - I think you can have them both in the same collection - I'm a guy who loves Subs - I also have a SubC Date. They are all great and can all coexist - you will love them all.
__________________
joejoe1225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 02:00 PM   #17
joejoe1225
"TRF" Member
 
joejoe1225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
[ATTACH]557767[

Look at this piece - it's awesome!!!

Pic found online from another member.
Attached Images
 
__________________
joejoe1225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 02:12 PM   #18
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Price favors the 114060.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 02:19 PM   #19
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Honestly a great combo would be a Hulk and a SD4000

or a GMT2C and a SD4000

Sub no date is nice too but it doesn't seem like you are feeling it anymore....they hold their value well....sell it and get what you really like!
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2014, 03:44 AM   #20
1995akcoop
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturgeon123456 View Post
Honestly a great combo would be a Hulk and a SD4000

or a GMT2C and a SD4000

Sub no date is nice too but it doesn't seem like you are feeling it anymore....they hold their value well....sell it and get what you really like!
what he said
1995akcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 03:50 PM   #21
otisc
"TRF" Member
 
otisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LV HULK
Posts: 639
I think the SubC and SD4000 wear differently enough that you can definitely have both. To me, the SubC is just perfect and disappears on my wrist weight-wise. The SD4000 isn't as ridiculous as the DSSR, but has enough extra bulk, weight, and subtle differences (raised crystal) to remind you it is there in the the most pleasurable way.

I think it more comes down to: deep down, you want the date complication, but you don't want the cyclops.
otisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2014, 02:26 AM   #22
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by otisc View Post

I think it more comes down to: deep down, you want the date complication, but you don't want the cyclops.
Are you a mind reader? You just nail it, my main concern, is having a date worth the extra $?
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2014, 02:53 AM   #23
chris975d
"TRF" Member
 
chris975d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winder, Georgia
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by simongpaez View Post
Are you a mind reader? You just nail it, my main concern, is having a date worth the extra $?

As someone who has traded in a 114060 for a new SD, I think that's not the only question to ask yourself. Yes, the date feature is there, but there's also a difference in design and look on wrist that is often not noticed until you've had wrist time with each one. In photos there's not a lot of difference between the two (SD-C and Sub-C), but once you've worn them both for a while, you (or at least I did) notice that the SD-C seems as if it's case and bracelet were designed as whole, with the way the lugs help to make the case flow much more smoothly into the bracelet. Whereas the sub-c's maxi case and its wider look seems (to me) as if it's flow into the bracelet was a design afterthought. The SD-c seems to give a more refined and "classic" look that I like much more than that of the maxi cased Subs. At least that's my opinion of it.

So in my eyes, the price difference was worth it and then some.
chris975d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2014, 03:00 AM   #24
Vladislav
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris975d View Post
As someone who has traded in a 114060 for a new SD, I think that's not the only question to ask yourself. Yes, the date feature is there, but there's also a difference in design and look on wrist that is often not noticed until you've had wrist time with each one. In photos there's not a lot of difference between the two (SD-C and Sub-C), but once you've worn them both for a while, you (or at least I did) notice that the SD-C seems as if it's case and bracelet were designed as whole, with the way the lugs help to make the case flow much more smoothly into the bracelet. Whereas the sub-c's maxi case and its wider look seems (to me) as if it's flow into the bracelet was a design afterthought. The SD-c seems to give a more refined and "classic" look that I like much more than that of the maxi cased Subs. At least that's my opinion of it.

So in my eyes, the price difference was worth it and then some.

Since you had both, can i ask what is lug to lug distance of SDc? I know that Sub C is 47 mm, so is SDc smaller? Thank you
Vladislav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2014, 03:12 AM   #25
chris975d
"TRF" Member
 
chris975d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winder, Georgia
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladislav View Post
Since you had both, can i ask what is lug to lug distance of SDc? I know that Sub C is 47 mm, so is SDc smaller? Thank you

Just a quick measurement with a set of calipers shows 46.4mm for the SD-C.
chris975d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 03:59 PM   #26
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
I really like subc. I haven't seen the sdc in person yet
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 04:20 PM   #27
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Im asking myself the same question and have no answer atm.
Maybe the good answer is removing the cylop of a SubC date by adding a new saphire.
But i just dont know if its possible and who can do it ?!!
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 05:07 PM   #28
Ichaice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 133
I've got the 114060 and the older 16600. I would love to try the SD 4000 but that would mean selling one of those plus another watch which I'm struggling to reconcile.
Ichaice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:18 PM   #29
mechanicaltime
"TRF" Member
 
mechanicaltime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: GMT -6
Watch: 114060
Posts: 212
SubC 114060 is fine with me.
mechanicaltime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2014, 11:27 PM   #30
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
I flipped no date for sdc. It really is amazing. Less common, date, thick but not ridiculous, you want me to go on?
Attached Images
 
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.