ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
27 April 2008, 10:09 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
|
DeepSea... Doh!!!
I have been stupid when browsing photos of the new DeepSea, and assumed that this photo was showing the watch with a domed crystal. However, on closer inspection, that clearly isnt the situation, and I am thinking this is the back of the case. Is that a glass back to the watch to show the movement? Or is it a flat black back? What is it actually showing? Whatever, I quite like the Deep Sea, but that back looks like it will be as uncomfy as hell...
|
27 April 2008, 10:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
I think the caseback is supposed to be titanium and I believe the curve is an optical illusion.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
27 April 2008, 10:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
|
I hope so, because otherwise that would be ridiculously uncomfortable. I am pretty tempted to order one of these I think. Can anyone confirm are the centre links polished or brushed?
|
27 April 2008, 10:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
They are brushed.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
27 April 2008, 10:34 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
|
Even better. Think I will make the call tomorrow.
|
27 April 2008, 10:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Steady - think about your M3!!
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
27 April 2008, 10:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
|
MOT passed with flying colours. No new tyres required.
|
27 April 2008, 10:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Well - that's great news. No doubt you'll be feeling the pull of the Rolex magnetism again now!! Hope all's well in your part of the world.
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
27 April 2008, 10:38 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: willie
Location: pie hole
Watch: still looking
Posts: 924
|
make sure u bring a few bottles of o2 when u go for a deepsea.
|
27 April 2008, 10:47 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
Hate to be the bearer of bad news but... the back is also domed. It's been long known that spherical shapes are very strong and highly pressure resistant. In the end, it's a matter of degree and comfort (oh yeah, and price )
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
27 April 2008, 10:57 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,112
|
Quote:
I guess I will need to try one, just seems that it wouldnt be overly comfortable, but I guess they can't have made it too bad. Most of them won't be bought for their "purpose" so if they are uncomfortable Rolex may have a problem on their hands. |
|
27 April 2008, 11:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
I forgot to mention, the back is indeed titanium. The outer ring is SS and appears to serve as a screw-ring applying pressure to the center part securing it against a sealing surface (lock ring?) around the perimeter of the inside of the case.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
27 April 2008, 01:29 PM | #13 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Hmmmmmm....with that size (43 mm) and that enormous weight (222 grams), coupled with that caseback dome, makes you really wonder what the comfort level will be like!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
27 April 2008, 06:58 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
I asked the AD just how finely you can adjust the bracelet since I would expect the DSSD to be a (potentially) very unfortable watch to wear due to its weight. His reply was that the 1,8 mm increments of the saw toothed adjusting facility of the clasp are equivalent to the pin holes of the ordinary SD bracelet. Imho, it does make a great difference when you shift the pin one hole back or forth, so I would expect the DSSD to fit you like a glove. But only IF you are lucky to have just the right size of wrist where one of the "saw edge" adjusting positions fits you Because if you are moving the saw edge lever either back or forth, it would result in either a too loose or too snug fit.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
27 April 2008, 01:36 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
222 grams sounds heavy indeed but... there are Omega's that match that weight. By all measures, the new DeepSea is a TANK. I mean that in a good way. Now if Rolex would quit drinking their own bathwater and stop engraving stuff on every available space...
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
27 April 2008, 01:38 PM | #16 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
The OMEGA PO (45.5 mm) weighs in at a massive 222 grams. I should know....I owned one.....and it was NOT a very comfy watch!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 April 2008, 07:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
|
GMT II C YG my AD wears weighs in at around 217 gms.
__________________
Rolex SS Daytona x 2, Milgauss GV, SD, Deep Sea; Breitling Montbrillant Olympus, Navitimer Fighters x 2, SOHC LE, Bentley GT LE, Lemans LE Muhle Glashutte Horch LE, Oris Carlos Coste LE Chrono Ernst Benz Chronoscope, M Lacroix Dble Retrograde GMT, |
27 April 2008, 01:41 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
If the caseback is domed I can't imagine it being to the degree that the photo portrays. It would have to be very subtle or it would certainly be uncomfortable.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
27 April 2008, 01:41 PM | #19 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
27 April 2008, 01:44 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
At least you wont need to buy a lead belt when you go diving.
__________________
E |
27 April 2008, 01:45 PM | #21 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
27 April 2008, 05:48 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Look like shappere crystal?
|
27 April 2008, 06:48 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
|
Although we all appreciate the automatic mechanical movement that the Rolex brand is famous for, a quartz movement in a silicone filled case is simply a better solution for deep diving, and big maximum depth numbers. The Technomarine Abyss is rated for 12,000 meters, and doesn't require an outrageous structure to prevent implosion. The practice of filling deep diving electronic instuments with liquid is well known. The "Jason" submersible and others have used this technique to much success to prowl the ocean depths without failure.
I like the SD, but think that I'll be looking for a current model for it's simplicity, elegance, and classic design. The Deep Sea is just overkill for someone like me who never plans on diving or being on the wrong side of the submarine pressure vessel.
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986 |
28 April 2008, 12:33 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Domed Back
I know that the Panerai Arktos & GMT North Pole have domed backs & get mixed reviews. I remember reading that someone lasted a week wearing an Arktos & sold it because it too uncomfortable.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
27 April 2008, 06:57 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
27 April 2008, 06:58 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
|
I want I want I want I want..... I don't care how heavy/uncomfortable/tastelesss it is - I still want one - why IS that?!!
is it shower-resistant though? |
27 April 2008, 07:00 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Quote:
If you mean resistant to banging it on the shower head, or tiles, then probably NOT!!
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
|
27 April 2008, 07:17 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
In contrary to what the majority thinks since SDDS 's introduction and still up to now, I am 100% that - when we start getting this watch at hands and seeing it for real around - it will be a major success, an object to admire and even envy and the subject of many discussions. Just wait and see.
I liked this watch since the 1st time I saw it - even though I am one of those who like the classic Rolex looks and not necessarily the new direction where Rolex is going (I even bought last week a Pepsi GMT instead of the GMT-IIc). But I find this one being a classic as well - adjusted for the 21st century (if only the price was reasonable...)
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
27 April 2008, 09:34 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
I heard you have to be Trimix certified (per Rolex) to purchase a Deep Sea
Click here for Trimix Definition Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
27 April 2008, 09:43 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
In addition to paying 6500 euros?
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.