The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 December 2014, 07:53 AM   #1
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
Cases 111 and 312

hello
PAM cases of Luminor 1950 are different from Luminor Base?
Seem the same but when I see photos of a 312 and a 111 I think they are different. Both are 44 mm. It seems to me or is there any difference?
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 08:25 AM   #2
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
111 is a "Bettarini" style case from the 90s for 40 and 44mm Luminors. The 1950 case is an homage to the style from, you guessed it, the 1950s.

Look at profile shots of the two and you'll notice many differences, chiefly case thickness, shape and lug angle.

The 372/422 case is 1950, too, but known to be a transitional model of some sort (a more knowledge person could give more info), with differences compared to the 312-style 1950 case.

For me, when I was trying models regularly to find one I liked, I found the 312 sat too high on my wrist and was top-heavy, while the Bettarini case sat much better. Just depends on your wrist and preferences.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 11:38 PM   #3
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
111 is a "Bettarini" style case from the 90s for 40 and 44mm Luminors. The 1950 case is an homage to the style from, you guessed it, the 1950s.

Look at profile shots of the two and you'll notice many differences, chiefly case thickness, shape and lug angle.

The 372/422 case is 1950, too, but known to be a transitional model of some sort (a more knowledge person could give more info), with differences compared to the 312-style 1950 case.

For me, when I was trying models regularly to find one I liked, I found the 312 sat too high on my wrist and was top-heavy, while the Bettarini case sat much better. Just depends on your wrist and preferences.

Thanks for the clarification. This week I'm going to visit to my local dealer to see them personally. I've read some reviews about the weight of 312 and now Forum colleague Synequano talk about the benefits of titanium in the cases 1950. Although many say the 312 is the icon of Panerai models I think I'll decide by 351 if I really like it better than the models equipped with box Bettarini
Happy New Year.
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 02:35 PM   #4
synequano
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 413
In my opinion,the 1950 case works better in lighter materials (Ti,ceramic),yet Bettarini still sits better on the wrist

AFAIK,the 1950 case on 372 is actually a new design that is also different than the 6152
synequano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 11:40 PM   #5
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by synequano View Post
In my opinion,the 1950 case works better in lighter materials (Ti,ceramic),yet Bettarini still sits better on the wrist

AFAIK,the 1950 case on 372 is actually a new design that is also different than the 6152
I'll try. Thanks and Happy New Year,
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 11:23 PM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Actually the 47mm 1950 case is as close to the 6152 design as it gets (for now). The design elements are all there. The only difference really is 3mm thickness between the two.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 December 2014, 11:41 PM   #7
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Actually the 47mm 1950 case is as close to the 6152 design as it gets (for now). The design elements are all there. The only difference really is 3mm thickness between the two.
Thanks. Happy New Year.
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.