ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 April 2008, 05:26 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 469
|
Detailed comparison GMTII & GMTIIC
Hi everyone!
I know I know a lot talks and threads about differences between 16710 & 116710 but I wanted to put my own observations and fine details about differences mostly in looks and feel of the watch. In no way I'm trying to put GMTIIC above older GMTII! Please, the holders of 16710 do not think that way! I love both watches and it is the best GMT's in the world, I just want to put my observations on how Rolex made the best GMT even better! First of all these are the updates I knew even before I bought 116710: Updated 3186 movement and parachrom-blu spring, new thicker case with triplock crown, Ceramic bezel, ROLEXROLEX rehaut, Maxi Dial, New bracelet with polished full center links, New clasp with easy link. So these are the updates as we all know... NOW THE FINE DETAILS I REALLY LOVE ABOUT GMTIIC : THE BRACELET: The new bracelet is AWESOME!!! It is great not because it's new but because of the updates it has. I like to wear my watch tight and it was always hard for me to adjust the clasp evenly on the other side. On my previous GMT II and DJ I couldn't make the clasp perfectly center. Now on my GMTIIC I can finally adjust the clasp perfectly in the center as it allows me to have four links on the side of 6o'clock! The feel of the bracelet is great. Although there is no noticeable difference in the feel when the watch is on the wrist except the weight, but huge difference when you hold both of the watches side by side, the older one rattles MUCH more and feels cheaper due to hollow center links. Even though the center links are polished and scratches much easier than brushed links I'd say I really like the look. Especially at night the difference between brushed and polished links is so cool! It gives different dimension to the look of the bracelet. Also I don’t think there is a possibility to stretch as easy as hollow links, so it makes it much sturdier bracelet in functionality as well. THE CLASP: The clasp itself is a piece of art in mho. It is heavy and well constructed. The old one is not near to it though the functionality part of it is identical. I always thought that clasp on Rolexes are some how cheap due to it’s construction and thin metal. I always liked my Seamaster bracelet and clasp much more due to those facts. But not anymore! The crown stamp on the new clasp is great and looks much sharper to the old one, because it looks like it is somehow attached to the bracelet. Also interestingly the clasp is not scratching the bracelet. On older ones clasp was rubbing to the bracelet leaving marks but here I can not see any, it looks like inside of the clasp (the side where easy link is) made that way so it doesn’t contact with all of the bracelet, but just small part of it rubs against each other so it gives much less scratches between and all of it happens inside of the clasp so you don’t see any scratches on the bracelet. Also the safety lock on it works great and when it’s closed you practically won’t see the seams between the clasp and it all looks as one part and when you open it won’t wobble and gives the right feel. The inside of clasp also looks different. Instead of two thin brushed metals now it has a sturdy thick metals which goes into each other when you close the clasp that way it aligns perfectly and is very comfortable. THE CASE: Well, the case is updated and a bit thicker, somehow similar to SD but very comfortable due to case back is flatter. I have never complained about older cases but the new one is definitely more comfortable. And yes, having a triplock crown is a plus, not only it looks better but it’s functions although both watches are the same 100m water proof. THE BEZEL: One word- OUTSTANDING. I love the fact that the clicks are one hour changes, so it’s really easy to change the time on it even not looking at the bezel. If you know how many hours you need to chage just simply click it that much time and that’s it. Very easy to use in mho. Also I like the fact that the bezel is thicker and almost on the same level with the crystal, which gives more protection to the crystal as there are no edges coming out. And it clicks really sweet, you know what I mean!!! Also Ceramic makes it bit more blingy but I can live with that knowing it is virtually indestructible. Lot of people don’t like the big numbers on it but I really like it and I don’t find it is too busy, of course everyone can have their own opinion and taste. After using it for a while the previous bezel looks somehow empty to me. THE DIAL: Maxi dial is a plus. Looks bold and glows longer. Once you like the maxi dial there is no turn back. It somehow completes the watch and the green 24hr hand is very nice touch, although I can’t say which one I like more red or green. I guess they are both great colors on those dials! THE CRYSTAL: Always liked the Cyclops. I think it looks great and distinguishes the Rolex, although I like SD without it as well. Now the new GMT IIC has a antireflection coating on the Cyclops so it is much easier to read the date! Not a huge thing but really nice touch!!! CONCLUSION: In my humble opinion the new GMT IIC is a great watch with all the updates and small details and it is the watch that I would never flip. As I mentioned the previous is the best GMT in the world, so Rolex made the best even better! The GMT IIC! I hope you enjoyed my observations about the watch and if you have anything to add to it please do so! Thank you very much for reading my long post! BOTH WRIST SHOTS |
29 April 2008, 05:29 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
Nice info, thanks. Nice pictures also.
|
11 November 2008, 08:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Great review. Thanks.
__________________
Ron |
29 April 2008, 05:59 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
Nice write-up! I agree with your sentiments, although it did take a while for me to warm up to the GMTc's features, including the maxi dial and supercase. Now, I love the GMTc and its looks.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
29 April 2008, 07:48 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Great review! This oughta be in the reviews section!
Thanks for sharing!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
29 April 2008, 07:52 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
Thank you, nice review
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
29 April 2008, 08:32 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3
|
Thanks for the info...about to jump in and was considering the older GMT simply for the cost savings but my heart is with the ceramic bezel. Does anyone have an opinion of going through a grey market dealer versus an AD? At this point, it looks like I'd only be saving about $800. What would I miss by not buying from an AD?
|
29 April 2008, 09:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
What a great review! Well done!!
A few pics if I may for comparison, |
30 April 2008, 01:04 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jake
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Green Submariner
Posts: 751
|
Hi Mike!!!
Superb comparison photos!!! I enjoyed them very much. Jake
__________________
Editor & Publisher of Jake's Rolex World Magazine which you can always find at: http://www.RolexMagazine.com |
29 April 2008, 11:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
There have been threads about this, but I personally prefer buying from AD, but that's just my opinion. I like to get the peace of mind, and the Rolex USA warranty. If you do buy from gray dealers, make sure you buy from reputable dealers, who may also offer the same warranty work.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
29 April 2008, 11:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Nashville, TN
Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc
Posts: 1,210
|
Great review. I loved it so much I bought one. I can't tell you how excited I get looking at that watch on my wrist. This watch will be one my son inherits from me one day as I plan on keeping it.
__________________
|
29 April 2008, 09:35 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
IMO GMT IIc would be perfect with a red 24h hand, and a brushed centre link. Anyone?
__________________
16800 Matt (1986) Avatar pic by Jocke |
5 May 2008, 04:59 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Maui Breach
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
The problem with the green hand is that it is difficult to see against the black background. |
|
5 May 2008, 05:39 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
Wonderful review. A new member was just debating with himself in another thread over whether to flip a GMT II for GMT IIc. This should be very helpful.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
5 May 2008, 05:47 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Great review. I love the watch. It is my first Rolex after wearing a Tag for many years. I love everything about the watch and have no words of criticism whatsoever. I have the TT version and am absolutely thrilled to be able to own such a fine watch. It had a price increase and, I hear another price increase is happening in June, so I got it before the 1st increase otherwise that would have probably priced me out of the watch. Here is my showoff picture:
This was an excellent review. I agree with whoever said this should be in the review section. I agree with all of your points. I don't think the center links should be brushed. I like the shininess on the SS and TT version. I also think the clasp is awesome. The watch fits much better and is more comfortable than my Submariner. Thanks for the great pictures and great review. Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
5 May 2008, 11:51 AM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Quote:
Great pic of the TT |
|
18 May 2008, 11:19 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Good review!!!
|
19 May 2008, 09:52 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 469
|
Thanks for transferring!!! Appreciate it!
I hope this info will be useful!!!! |
16 October 2008, 03:54 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: thailand / m'sia
Watch: YG DD & GMT,TT SUB
Posts: 1,265
|
GMT IIc all the way.....
__________________
Present Collections TT Date-just, TT Sub. (Bluesy), YG Date-Date, YG GMT IIc (Black dial). SS GMT IIc |
24 October 2008, 05:55 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: GMT 2
Posts: 324
|
It would appear now that the Sub and GMT are now in the same case with a different bezel ring and movement No?
|
4 January 2009, 10:31 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lkwd NY SRQ FL
Watch: GMT Ceramic
Posts: 28
|
Great comparison pictures....no longer have my pepsi but do have a new GMT II C...both handsome but different....what camera are you using....thanks.
|
26 April 2009, 03:04 AM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
12 May 2009, 04:12 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Hendri Leong
Location: Indonesia
Watch: GMT Master IIc TT
Posts: 33
|
thanks for the info... i aim for it.. TT or full gold... :D
|
2 November 2008, 06:25 PM | #24 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
Quote:
Brushed center links would be very nice. Some have done it themselves. I may be tempted to have my watchmaker do it for me --- professionally. |
|
28 November 2008, 12:45 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The War Room
Watch: 116200, 116710
Posts: 76
|
I just got a brand new GMT IIc from an AD last week and I have been thinking this exact same thing you said!
|
1 January 2009, 02:25 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
|
IMO the GMT IIc would be even better if it stayed just as it is. But thats me
__________________
Bård |
29 April 2008, 11:58 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Miguel Cornejo
Location: El Paso Tx
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 488
|
I agree with you 110%!
Here is my wristshot! and a studio photo not mine but that I love about this watch!!!
__________________
Rolex Daytona 116500LN Black, Rolex Daytona 116500LN White, Rolex TT GMTIIC, Panerai 88, Cartier Santos TT Auto, Omega Seamaster GMT Bond Co-axial, Omega Constellation SS Auto, Tag Heuer Carrera Chrono Tachy Auto |
30 April 2008, 12:32 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 469
|
Thanks guys!!!
I hope you enjoyed the detailed review!!!!!! |
30 April 2008, 12:50 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: USA, California
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 92
|
I'd like to see more pics!!
Plz |
1 May 2008, 04:58 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 469
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.