ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

syahriltaher · 10 March 2015, 08:32 PM

Guys,

Which one will you choose?

Personally, I prefer this classic....

superdog · 10 March 2015, 08:37 PM

Always Preffered the newer styles.

But my preference is changing.

Starting to prefer their predecessors lately.

Cockyteal · 10 March 2015, 09:24 PM

I like both - classic Pepsi / Coke and Batman.

So voted for both.

Go GMTs.

kilyung · 10 March 2015, 10:28 PM

They're really two different watches imo.

Onikage · 10 March 2015, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

They're really two different watches imo.

Indeed. Two very different looks.

fishingbear · 11 March 2015, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

They're really two different watches imo.

Agree. I prefer the 5 digit reference GMT but I consider them to be separate watches altogether. And as the same goes for the Subs, SD, Exp II and so on as Rolex developed the 6 digit references they are all really different watches designed for the same purposes as their predecessors.

Psmith · 10 March 2015, 10:58 PM

116710

Too many nice improvements, especially the clasp

ronricks · 10 March 2015, 11:10 PM

I like both but went with the 116710 because of the upgraded bracelet and clasp. I like the trip lock crown also. Can't go wrong with either though.

samson66 · 10 March 2015, 11:09 PM

16710

I like the new ceramic dial, but I just can't get past the PCL's. They just don't belong on this watch IMHO.

AK797 · 10 March 2015, 11:13 PM

New ceramics for me.

Annan · 10 March 2015, 11:17 PM

I never seriously considered a 16710 but did try one on (Pepsi). It was preowned, in fairly good shape and beautiful. I was struck however by how light it felt and passed. A few years later I got the 116710 and really appreciated the upgrades. I had the same experience when I flipped my 16570 for a 216570.

wdin · 10 March 2015, 11:24 PM

coke for me.

gmt-C don't do it for me... the lugs and the bezel numeral size make it look too big for my small wrist.

Dan Pierce · 10 March 2015, 11:27 PM

This one = these.
dP

Britexpat76 · 10 March 2015, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

This one = these.
dP

I have shamelessly copied you and purchased a 2001 16710 Coke.

Pepsi Bezel ordered she's having 2 extra links added and a spa, should be rocking my wrist by Thursday. Do you swap the Bezels yourself? If so is it easy to do without completely screwing them up? I have the coordination of a money on drugs and the gentle touch of an elephant in musth

jcd · 10 March 2015, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

This one = these.
dP

This ^^^^ is, in part, why I prefer the older one. I'm waiting for the coke insert to arrive and I'll have all 3. I'd really like to get a jubilee for it to. It's such a versatile piece. Like having several watches in one.

I just don't know how difficult it will be to source a super jubilee and the correct spring bars.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Britexpat76

I have shamelessly copied you and purchased a 2001 16710 Coke.

Pepsi Bezel ordered she's having 2 extra links added and a spa, should be rocking my wrist by Thursday. Do you swap the Bezels yourself? If so is it easy to do without completely screwing them up? I have the coordination of a money on drugs and the gentle touch of an elephant in musth

I just tried swapping the inserts for the first time last week. It went great! I'm not good with this kind of stuff either, but check out Jocke's tutorial as well as a couple youtube vids and give it a go.

I'm typically a moron when it comes to this stuff and I did it in under 5 minutes.

Just be careful of the click spring!

Dan Pierce · 10 March 2015, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcd

This ^^^^ is, in part, why I prefer the older one. I'm waiting for the coke insert to arrive and I'll have all 3. I'd really like to get a jubilee for it to. It's such a versatile piece. Like having several watches in one.

I just don't know how difficult it will be to source a super jubilee and the correct spring bars.

I just tried swapping the inserts for the first time last week. It went great! I'm not good with this kind of stuff either, but check out Jocke's tutorial as well as a couple youtube vids and give it a go.

I'm typically a moron when it comes to this stuff and I did it in under 5 minutes.

Just be careful of the click spring!

Well done, Jack!

dP

capote · 10 March 2015, 11:30 PM

The 5 digit one

Chris B · 10 March 2015, 11:42 PM

16710

I seem to have a preference for older things these days ..

Dan Pierce · 10 March 2015, 11:44 PM

James,

I'm honored to have been an influence, mate! Your GMT has the best of both modern and classic, SELs & lug holes.

Yes, I replace the inserts myself. Very easy with just a few proper precautions. I did scratch a lug the first time but nothing my watchmaker couldn't fix quickly. Check the tutorials in the library section.

Good luck & congrats,
dP

Britexpat76 · 11 March 2015, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

James,

I'm honored to have been an influence, mate! Your GMT has the best of both modern and classic, SELs & lug holes.

Yes, I replace the inserts myself. Very easy with just a few proper precautions. I did scratch a lug the first time but nothing my watchmaker couldn't fix quickly. Check the tutorials in the library section.

Good luck & congrats,
dP

Thanks Dan, I Can't wait to start experimenting with it, I shall keep you posted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcd

I just tried swapping the inserts for the first time last week. It went great! I'm not good with this kind of stuff either, but check out Jocke's tutorial as well as a couple youtube vids and give it a go.

I'm typically a moron when it comes to this stuff and I did it in under 5 minutes.

Just be careful of the click spring!

Thank You for the Advice - Looks like tonights entertainment is watching Youtube!

SeminarianMike · 10 March 2015, 11:50 PM

id stick with the ceramic

rainbowmax · 11 March 2015, 12:03 AM

5 digit hands down

Eric Chan · 11 March 2015, 02:09 AM

Voted for 116710. Love the upgrades to the bracelet.

presario · 12 March 2015, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric chan

voted for 116710. Love the upgrades to the bracelet.

+1

Speed · 11 March 2015, 02:13 AM

I'll say it again...advice from my RSC re bezel insert swapping.

Eventually you will wear down the tight connection your bezel has with your case. Switch your inserts judiciously and not too often.

watchwatcher · 11 March 2015, 03:38 AM

For me, just about anything versus the IIc is going to lose.

bbressler · 11 March 2015, 04:24 AM

I chose both!

You can read a short comparison I did here

Long story short:
16710: I prefer the case shape, brushed center links, red GMT hand, and ability to change inserts

116710: I prefer the comfort of the bracelet/clasp, ceramic insert, movement of the bezel, AR coating on date window, and larger dial markers

Both are fantastic watches, try them both on and see which one sings to you more. Can't really go wrong.

SWISSAHOLICS · 11 March 2015, 04:27 AM

Classic 16710

watchabout · 11 March 2015, 04:28 AM

16710 all the way.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

franzy · 11 March 2015, 04:48 AM

Like others have said they are really different. The 116710LN is very flashy and can be a bit much in certain settings. It's something to think about.

View Poll Results: GMT Master II 16710 vs GMT Master II 116710
GMT Master II 16710	121	54.50%
GMT Master II 116710	104	46.85%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

10 March 2015, 08:32 PM	#1
syahriltaher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Real Name: Syahril Location: Bogor, Indonesia Watch: Rolex, Omega Posts: 650	GMT Master II 16710 vs GMT Master II 116710 Guys, Which one will you choose? Personally, I prefer this classic.... Attached Images __________________ - Rolex RG Daytona 116505 - Rolex SS Submariner "Hulk" - Rolex SS Sky Dweller "Black Dial" - Rolex SS GMT Master II 16710 "Coke" - Rolex GMT Master II CHNR "Rootbeer" TT - Rolex SS Daytona Ceramic 116500LN "Black Dial" - Rolex 126710 "New Batman" 2022 - Rolex SS/WG Datejust 41 126334 "Blue Roman" - Panerai "PAM 88" GMT - Omega New Moonwatch 3861

10 March 2015, 08:37 PM	#2
superdog 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,834	Always Preffered the newer styles. But my preference is changing. Starting to prefer their predecessors lately. __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

10 March 2015, 10:58 PM	#7
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	116710 Too many nice improvements, especially the clasp __________________

10 March 2015, 11:17 PM	#11
Annan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Ron Location: Arizona, USA Watch: 116233 Posts: 3,180	I never seriously considered a 16710 but did try one on (Pepsi). It was preowned, in fairly good shape and beautiful. I was struck however by how light it felt and passed. A few years later I got the 116710 and really appreciated the upgrades. I had the same experience when I flipped my 16570 for a 216570. __________________ *so many Rolexes.....so little time*

10 March 2015, 09:24 PM	#3
Cockyteal "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Australia Watch: & be amazed! Posts: 87	I like both - classic Pepsi / Coke and Batman. So voted for both. Go GMTs.

10 March 2015, 10:28 PM	#4
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	They're really two different watches imo.

10 March 2015, 11:10 PM	#8
ronricks 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: ATL Watch: 126610LV Posts: 2,753	I like both but went with the 116710 because of the upgraded bracelet and clasp. I like the trip lock crown also. Can't go wrong with either though.

10 March 2015, 11:09 PM	#9
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,793	16710 I like the new ceramic dial, but I just can't get past the PCL's. They just don't belong on this watch IMHO.

10 March 2015, 11:13 PM	#10
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	New ceramics for me.

10 March 2015, 11:24 PM	#12
wdin "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: N/A Posts: 679	coke for me. gmt-C don't do it for me... the lugs and the bezel numeral size make it look too big for my small wrist.

10 March 2015, 11:27 PM	#13
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	This one = these. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

10 March 2015, 11:30 PM	#17
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	The 5 digit one

10 March 2015, 11:42 PM	#18
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,631	16710 I seem to have a preference for older things these days ..

10 March 2015, 11:44 PM	#19
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,217	James, I'm honored to have been an influence, mate! Your GMT has the best of both modern and classic, SELs & lug holes. Yes, I replace the inserts myself. Very easy with just a few proper precautions. I did scratch a lug the first time but nothing my watchmaker couldn't fix quickly. Check the tutorials in the library section. Good luck & congrats, dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

10 March 2015, 11:50 PM	#21
SeminarianMike "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Mike Howard Location: Pittsburgh Pa Watch: Skydweller, GMT Posts: 309	id stick with the ceramic __________________ God bless you Mike Howard

11 March 2015, 12:03 AM	#22
rainbowmax "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: rome italy Watch: 14060M Posts: 165	5 digit hands down

11 March 2015, 02:09 AM	#23
Eric Chan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Eric Chan Location: Vancouver, BC CAN Watch: Day-Date 118238 Posts: 8,798	Voted for 116710. Love the upgrades to the bracelet. __________________ Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016

11 March 2015, 02:13 AM	#25
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	GMT Master II 16710 vs GMT Master II 116710 I'll say it again...advice from my RSC re bezel insert swapping. Eventually you will wear down the tight connection your bezel has with your case. Switch your inserts judiciously and not too often.

11 March 2015, 03:38 AM	#26
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	For me, just about anything versus the IIc is going to lose.

11 March 2015, 04:24 AM	#27
bbressler "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Texas Watch: Exp, GMTII, Sub Posts: 1,184	I chose both! You can read a short comparison I did here Long story short: 16710: I prefer the case shape, brushed center links, red GMT hand, and ability to change inserts 116710: I prefer the comfort of the bracelet/clasp, ceramic insert, movement of the bezel, AR coating on date window, and larger dial markers Both are fantastic watches, try them both on and see which one sings to you more. Can't really go wrong.

11 March 2015, 04:27 AM	#28
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	Classic 16710 __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

11 March 2015, 04:28 AM	#29
watchabout "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Dave Location: miami Watch: Submariner Posts: 374	16710 all the way. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

11 March 2015, 04:48 AM	#30
franzy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: USA Posts: 1,264	Like others have said they are really different. The 116710LN is very flashy and can be a bit much in certain settings. It's something to think about.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)