The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: WWYD
Option 1 33 32.04%
Option 2 4 3.88%
Option 3 7 6.80%
Option 4 44 42.72%
Option 5 13 12.62%
Option 6 2 1.94%
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 March 2015, 11:32 AM   #1
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
WWYD? - What would you do?

Just bored and thinking out loud. Pictures seemed more fun.
So, what would you do....???

My State of the Collection
16610, 116610lv, 79220r, pam 232 - aka the keepers
116520, 214270, pam 111g - aka the sacrifices


Option 1.


Option 2.


Option 3.


Option 4.


Option 5.


Option 6.

I'm open to more options that involve the "sacrifices" and a up to 4k cash. YG is not considered as of now. Non-Rolex suggestions allowed also.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:36 AM   #2
mjm800
"TRF" Member
 
mjm800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
I would pick four you move two very nice watches for one super watch and don't bring any cash to the table.
__________________
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=39890&dateline=128330  1854
mjm800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:37 AM   #3
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
This must have taken a lot of time!

Option 4 for me. Don't trade the Daytona!

It looks like you want to get rid of the Exp!
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:38 AM   #4
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
Option 4. No way would I trade the Daytona.
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:40 AM   #5
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
What about option 1, but keep the Daytona and move the Tudor?
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:42 AM   #6
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
What about option 1, but keep the Daytona and move the Tudor?
That would be nice if the Tudor was worth 10,000!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:41 AM   #7
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjnd08 View Post
This must have taken a lot of time!

Option 4 for me. Don't trade the Daytona!

It looks like you want to get rid of the Exp!
It was more fun this way.

The "sacrifices" are all nice, just don't get enough wrist time.

Also, for anyone thinking this, this post is not a shill to sell my watches. I plan on consigning my watches with a dealer. I'm not up for private sales.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:47 AM   #8
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
It was more fun this way.

The "sacrifices" are all nice, just don't get enough wrist time.

Also, for anyone thinking this, this post is not a shill to sell my watches. I plan on consigning my watches with a dealer. I'm not up for private sales.
If they aren't getting wrist time, let them go.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:40 AM   #9
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Option 3 or 4 for me.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 01:26 AM   #10
PoderEsBueno
"TRF" Member
 
PoderEsBueno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: peb
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogman4me View Post
Option 3 or 4 for me.
X 2
__________________
Instagram• ~ poderes.bueno
PoderEsBueno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:41 AM   #11
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Get that Smurf.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:42 AM   #12
SwissFan99
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Florida
Watch: Explorer II, DJ
Posts: 41
Option 4
SwissFan99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:42 AM   #13
fania123
"TRF" Member
 
fania123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,726
Option 2, because I did it and still have no regrets
fania123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:43 AM   #14
rangercadre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: singapore
Posts: 189
sell 116520, 214270, pam 111g and get an AP ROO. you need some diversity of brands.
rangercadre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:45 AM   #15
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangercadre View Post
sell 116520, 214270, pam 111g and get an AP ROO. you need some diversity of brands.
Nice option 6. While the ROO is beautiful, don't think it fits my 6.5" wrist. The 232 is the limit for me. It works because of the wire lugs and thinness of the watch. I'm open to other options. I had been considering a 15300, but the bezel scratch magnet concerns me.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:46 AM   #16
B.B.B.
"TRF" Member
 
B.B.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Emmanuel
Location: California, USA
Watch: submariner lv m
Posts: 764
Seems your about to let go the pam
B.B.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:47 AM   #17
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.B.B. View Post
Seems your about to let go the pam
I don't like to say never, but the 232 is not going anywhere. Probable my favorite watch.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:53 AM   #18
sixfignig
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
I'd go with option 4
sixfignig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 11:56 AM   #19
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,671
To me option one would streamline the collection nicely with a top end piece keeping a nice diving theme.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:04 PM   #20
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Mik,
I voted for option 1 b/c my thought is for you're going through all the trouble to make a move, you need to come out of it with something really special...however, to be honest you have a spectacular collection. If not doing anything and just enjoying your SOTC was an option, I would have voted for that.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:08 PM   #21
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Mik,
I voted for option 1 b/c my thought is for you're going through all the trouble to make a move, you need to come out of it with something really special...however, to be honest you have a spectacular collection. If not doing anything and just enjoying your SOTC was an option, I would have voted for that.


I have actually thought about just logging off from the forums for a bit and be happy with what I have. To be honest, I can't believe at times I have amassed such a collection. If you would have told me 7 years ago, I'd have 7 stellar watches like this, I would have told you no way. That first $5,000 on the 16610 was hard to spend. But since then......well, it gets easier!
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:14 PM   #22
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post


I have actually thought about just logging off from the forums for a bit and be happy with what I have. To be honest, I can't believe at times I have amassed such a collection. If you would have told me 7 years ago, I'd have 7 stellar watches like this, I would have told you no way. That first $5,000 on the 16610 was hard to spend. But since then......well, it gets easier!
Letting the crack dealer to give you the first taste is hard, after that the rest is easy.

Option 4

Though - I think you should try a vintage character watch. If after 6 months you are not head over heels (you will be) then you'll most likely make most of your money back.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:25 PM   #23
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by linesiders View Post
Letting the crack dealer to give you the first taste is hard, after that the rest is easy.

Option 4

Though - I think you should try a vintage character watch. If after 6 months you are not head over heels (you will be) then you'll most likely make most of your money back.
Yeah, I have a friend who is into high end vintage. They are amazing, but I'm a little OCD. I'd be so scared of flaking, dial damage, etc. If there would be a flaw in the dial or hands, I'd focus on it. If I'd get a vintage, I'd have to get a top top top condition one to make my OCD at ease. Then, it would probable be so nice, I'd be scared to wear it.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:15 PM   #24
Naples09
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Jim
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post


I have actually thought about just logging off from the forums for a bit and be happy with what I have. To be honest, I can't believe at times I have amassed such a collection. If you would have told me 7 years ago, I'd have 7 stellar watches like this, I would have told you no way. That first $5,000 on the 16610 was hard to spend. But since then......well, it gets easier!
You have a great collection. Can't go wrong no matter what you pick. I like option 1 & 3. Best of luck to you!
Naples09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 01:07 AM   #25
MikelSS
"TRF" Member
 
MikelSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mikel
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post


I have actually thought about just logging off from the forums for a bit and be happy with what I have. To be honest, I can't believe at times I have amassed such a collection. If you would have told me 7 years ago, I'd have 7 stellar watches like this, I would have told you no way. That first $5,000 on the 16610 was hard to spend. But since then......well, it gets easier!
Without me taking into account any indication of what gets wrist time or not, I think you have an amazing collection and "in paper" I wouldn't change a thing (except maybe add more and more and more)

Now, taking into account what gets wrist time and what doesn't, I would go with option 4

MikelSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:13 PM   #26
707soldier
"TRF" Member
 
707soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: 707soldier
Location: California, USA
Watch: ROLEX USA
Posts: 522
4
__________________
707soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:18 PM   #27
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Just for what I'm into, other watches I've been pondering....(non-Rolex)

__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:20 PM   #28
Naples09
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Jim
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Just for what I'm into, other watches I've been pondering....(non-Rolex)

Those four would make a fantastic collection!

Naples09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:45 PM   #29
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Just for what I'm into, other watches I've been pondering....(non-Rolex)

5711 is a game changer.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 March 2015, 12:49 PM   #30
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjnd08 View Post
5711 is a game changer.
Yeah, take option 1, add the Tudor to the left side and swap the smurf for the 5711.

I recently passed on one. I didn't even want to try it on. Scared I'd love it.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.