ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Would you consider flipping you're DDII for the DD 40mm? | |||
Yes, I like the DD 40mm better and would consider flipping in the future | 110 | 50.23% | |
No, I like the DD II 41mm better and would never consider flipping | 69 | 31.51% | |
I prefer the DD 40mm but would not flip the DDII | 40 | 18.26% | |
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
21 March 2015, 07:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: & learn
Posts: 1,013
|
Would you flip you're DDII for a DD 40mm
For all the DDII owners out there, would you consider flipping you're DDII for a 40mm DD sometime in the future? Once there is a large variety of dials for the 40mm out there?
|
21 March 2015, 08:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Based on pics, yes. But I want to see them side by side and in person.
|
21 March 2015, 09:09 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Nope.
|
21 March 2015, 09:13 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maine
Watch: All of them
Posts: 1,376
|
Come on Mike, It's only 1mm of Platinum.....
|
21 March 2015, 09:25 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
21 March 2015, 09:21 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
No, I like the choco dial with numerals not diamond markers. If I didn't have the DDII I would take a serious look at the platinum glacier dial to see if it works in real life.
|
21 March 2015, 09:40 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 73
|
No
|
21 March 2015, 09:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
|
I wish you could have the DDII but with the new DD40 movement
|
21 March 2015, 10:00 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
I don't own a DD and would love to. With small wrists like mine, if I had the DDII I would seriously consider flipping it for the new one. If you have big wrists I don't think it's a good idea to sell the one you already own. My 2c.
|
21 March 2015, 10:10 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 2,009
|
DDII and DD40 dial is the same, the variety you have in the discontinued model will be offered in the new model , and more.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX |
21 March 2015, 10:21 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
i really like the way the 36mm looked (the classic), but i felt it was too small for me.
the 40 appears to be more similar to the 36mm proportions… just when i thought the collection was satisfied… there may finally be a DD in my future that said, from pics, not sure i like the laser etched waffle pattern on the platinum version or laser etched anything for that matter, it feels like it has become the buzz word in watches, i would take a simple porcelain dial over what feels to me like the gimmicky laser stuff… of course i may end up liking it in person, you never know?
__________________
|
21 March 2015, 10:41 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Purely academic for me as I don't own a DD2...if I was in the market for a DD I would probably go for a DD40 when there are a few more dial options to choose from. But if I had a DD2, I would stand pat with that.
|
21 March 2015, 11:09 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 160
|
I just bought a platinum DD11 2 weeks ago . I loved it then and I still love it now.
But.... Had I known the new version was immanent would I have waited and spent the money on the new 40 mm version? The honest answer is ........maybe , maybe not Ok it's got the new movement , but mine runs at less than + 2 seconds . I don't need the increased power reserve because I wear it every day. It's already got the ceramic pins in the links. It's out of proportion , unwieldy in the eyes of naysayers but a thing of beauty to me. The new smaller version seems to be a step away from the sporty /dress watch back to a solely dress watch So in a answer to the Op, no I reckon I will keep and cherish mine |
21 March 2015, 11:59 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
|
|
21 March 2015, 07:08 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 2,009
|
Quote:
The laser etched dials are just a new extra offering.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX |
|
21 March 2015, 11:09 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
21 March 2015, 11:58 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
|
To me, precious metal watch is about statement. The only point of using PM for a watch (when you have lighter, harder, stronger ss like 904L) is about prestige (either that or you simply want to exercise your wrist muscles).
So I prefer heavier than lighter PM watch. That 1 mm doesn't do much in terms of looks, and in terms of weight it is almost guaranteed that DD40 will be lighter (less gold, less platinum). The only attraction of DD40 is the new movement. Improved accuracy is not really a big deal to me, as the 3156 movement is just as accurate as I want it to be. It's not my daily wearer so I regularly have to set the time up everytime anyway. The bigger attraction is that extra 20hrs power reserve. But that's about it. So my answer is: no, for now I will not flip my DD2 for DD40... I wouldn't pay more for something that is actually smaller, however I want to try the DD40 on - my opinion may change, but for now I'm quite certain about it. |
21 March 2015, 12:04 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
Not a chance...and I would do dirty things for a platinum DDII.. good god they are gorgeous
|
21 March 2015, 12:35 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
I flipped my 37mm for the 41mm ...
I couldn't imagine going back down... I have never understood the proportion complaints... I find the bigger fluted bezel to reflect so much more light... It's magic on the wrist...
__________________
@RJKAMA on Instagram |
21 March 2015, 12:35 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
One more The only thing I will say, is that if discontinuing this model hurts resale... Then I'll jump at the first discounted platinum DD2 up for grabs
__________________
@RJKAMA on Instagram |
21 March 2015, 12:48 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: California
Watch: DD 40 Pt
Posts: 365
|
I'd like to have a DD Platty in 40 to "compliment" my 41 DD in WG!
|
21 March 2015, 12:57 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
I'll keep my DDII.
What about you, Sam? |
21 March 2015, 01:24 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
I don't think I would flip
|
21 March 2015, 02:38 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 267
|
__________________
PP 5980-1R / [Rolex WG Sky-Dweller] / AP 44mm RG ROO / Rolex DSSD / Rolex Pt Day Date II / AP 15202 40th Anniversary / Rolex YG GMTIIc / Rolex Sea Dweller / IWC SS Regulateur / Omega Sea Master Professional / Rolex TT DateJust |
21 March 2015, 05:35 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 115
|
|
21 March 2015, 02:57 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
|
Gorgeous watches... all of them!! Especially the platinum with concentric dial.
Those who said the proportions are off, bezel too big (it's a day date, not a daytona... d'oh) and so on and so on, all those critics. Chances are that they don't have it, never really got the chance to appreciate this masterpiece. I hope and will be glad if indeed DD2 is discontinued. It will be that much more special as we won't have more supply coming. As for resale value, I don't really care - I have stocks, bonds, for investment. I bought the DD2 for enjoyment. I can't wait to see DD2 next to DD40, and then ask any average Joe who doesn't know a thing about DD lineup - who's the big brother? |
21 March 2015, 03:12 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 617
|
If I already owned a ddii I would not flip for the sake of not wanting to lose money. If I was buying for the first time and had the option to choose I would pick the 40
|
21 March 2015, 04:08 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
No way would I flip. I think the 41mm is perfect, and would not go smaller.
|
21 March 2015, 04:56 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Funny how this thread turned into a DD2 picture thread!
|
21 March 2015, 05:11 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
|
...cause nobody here owns DD40 (yet)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.