The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Would you consider flipping you're DDII for the DD 40mm?
Yes, I like the DD 40mm better and would consider flipping in the future 110 50.23%
No, I like the DD II 41mm better and would never consider flipping 69 31.51%
I prefer the DD 40mm but would not flip the DDII 40 18.26%
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 March 2015, 07:50 AM   #1
Sammk
"TRF" Member
 
Sammk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: & learn
Posts: 1,013
Would you flip you're DDII for a DD 40mm

For all the DDII owners out there, would you consider flipping you're DDII for a 40mm DD sometime in the future? Once there is a large variety of dials for the 40mm out there?
Sammk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 08:02 AM   #2
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Based on pics, yes. But I want to see them side by side and in person.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:09 AM   #3
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Nope.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:13 AM   #4
Kevin.S
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Kevin.S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maine
Watch: All of them
Posts: 1,376
Come on Mike, It's only 1mm of Platinum.....
Kevin.S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:25 AM   #5
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin.S View Post
Come on Mike, It's only 1mm of Platinum.....
Yup.

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:21 AM   #6
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
No, I like the choco dial with numerals not diamond markers. If I didn't have the DDII I would take a serious look at the platinum glacier dial to see if it works in real life.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:40 AM   #7
grimmz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: amsterdam
Posts: 73
No
grimmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 09:49 AM   #8
ColRam425
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
I wish you could have the DDII but with the new DD40 movement
ColRam425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 10:00 AM   #9
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
I don't own a DD and would love to. With small wrists like mine, if I had the DDII I would seriously consider flipping it for the new one. If you have big wrists I don't think it's a good idea to sell the one you already own. My 2c.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 10:10 AM   #10
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 2,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammk View Post
Once there is a large variety of dials for the 40mm out there?
DDII and DD40 dial is the same, the variety you have in the discontinued model will be offered in the new model , and more.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 10:21 AM   #11
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
i really like the way the 36mm looked (the classic), but i felt it was too small for me.

the 40 appears to be more similar to the 36mm proportions… just when i thought the collection was satisfied… there may finally be a DD in my future


that said, from pics, not sure i like the laser etched waffle pattern on the platinum version or laser etched anything for that matter, it feels like it has become the buzz word in watches, i would take a simple porcelain dial over what feels to me like the gimmicky laser stuff… of course i may end up liking it in person, you never know?
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 10:41 AM   #12
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Purely academic for me as I don't own a DD2...if I was in the market for a DD I would probably go for a DD40 when there are a few more dial options to choose from. But if I had a DD2, I would stand pat with that.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 11:09 AM   #13
Numberjack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 160
I just bought a platinum DD11 2 weeks ago . I loved it then and I still love it now.
But....
Had I known the new version was immanent would I have waited and spent the money on the new 40 mm version?
The honest answer is ........maybe , maybe not

Ok it's got the new movement , but mine runs at less than + 2 seconds .
I don't need the increased power reserve because I wear it every day.
It's already got the ceramic pins in the links.

It's out of proportion , unwieldy in the eyes of naysayers but a thing of beauty to me.
The new smaller version seems to be a step away from the sporty /dress watch back to a solely dress watch

So in a answer to the Op, no I reckon I will keep and cherish mine

Numberjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 11:59 AM   #14
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numberjack View Post
I just bought a platinum DD11 2 weeks ago . I loved it then and I still love it now.
But....
Had I known the new version was immanent would I have waited and spent the money on the new 40 mm version?
The honest answer is ........maybe , maybe not

Ok it's got the new movement , but mine runs at less than + 2 seconds .
I don't need the increased power reserve because I wear it every day.
It's already got the ceramic pins in the links.

It's out of proportion , unwieldy in the eyes of naysayers but a thing of beauty to me.
The new smaller version seems to be a step away from the sporty /dress watch back to a solely dress watch

So in a answer to the Op, no I reckon I will keep and cherish mine

I like that dial more than the current 'waffle' dial. It doesn't do it for me, it's too... AP ? It's a Rolex come on, waffle is for APs.
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 07:08 PM   #15
DVR
"TRF" Member
 
DVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 2,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by engin33r View Post
I like that dial more than the current 'waffle' dial. It doesn't do it for me, it's too... AP ? It's a Rolex come on, waffle is for APs.
What's your point? This concentric dial will be immediately available in the DD40 together with most other dials offered today.
The laser etched dials are just a new extra offering.
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX
DVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 11:09 PM   #16
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVR View Post
This concentric dial will be immediately available in the DD40 together with most other dials offered today.
The laser etched dials are just a new extra offering.
Where'd you hear that?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 11:58 AM   #17
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
To me, precious metal watch is about statement. The only point of using PM for a watch (when you have lighter, harder, stronger ss like 904L) is about prestige (either that or you simply want to exercise your wrist muscles).

So I prefer heavier than lighter PM watch. That 1 mm doesn't do much in terms of looks, and in terms of weight it is almost guaranteed that DD40 will be lighter (less gold, less platinum). The only attraction of DD40 is the new movement. Improved accuracy is not really a big deal to me, as the 3156 movement is just as accurate as I want it to be. It's not my daily wearer so I regularly have to set the time up everytime anyway. The bigger attraction is that extra 20hrs power reserve. But that's about it.

So my answer is: no, for now I will not flip my DD2 for DD40... I wouldn't pay more for something that is actually smaller, however I want to try the DD40 on - my opinion may change, but for now I'm quite certain about it.
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 12:04 PM   #18
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
Not a chance...and I would do dirty things for a platinum DDII.. good god they are gorgeous
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 12:35 PM   #19
SUPERDOC
"TRF" Member
 
SUPERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
I flipped my 37mm for the 41mm ...

I couldn't imagine going back down...

I have never understood the proportion complaints...
I find the bigger fluted bezel to reflect so much more light...

It's magic on the wrist...
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 720
Size:  141.4 KB
__________________
@RJKAMA on Instagram
SUPERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 12:35 PM   #20
SUPERDOC
"TRF" Member
 
SUPERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 722
Size:  158.8 KB

One more

The only thing I will say, is that if discontinuing this model hurts resale...
Then I'll jump at the first discounted platinum DD2 up for grabs
__________________
@RJKAMA on Instagram
SUPERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 12:48 PM   #21
rudegar
"TRF" Member
 
rudegar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: California
Watch: DD 40 Pt
Posts: 365
I'd like to have a DD Platty in 40 to "compliment" my 41 DD in WG!
rudegar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 12:57 PM   #22
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
I'll keep my DDII.

What about you, Sam?
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 01:24 PM   #23
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
I don't think I would flip
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 02:38 PM   #24
Hkexpat183
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 267
I will be keeping mine...



__________________
PP 5980-1R / [Rolex WG Sky-Dweller] / AP 44mm RG ROO / Rolex DSSD / Rolex Pt Day Date II / AP 15202 40th Anniversary / Rolex YG GMTIIc / Rolex Sea Dweller / IWC SS Regulateur / Omega Sea Master Professional / Rolex TT DateJust
Hkexpat183 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 05:35 PM   #25
borgan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hkexpat183 View Post
I will be keeping mine...



ohhhh.. that platinum piece is naughty...
borgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 02:57 PM   #26
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
Gorgeous watches... all of them!! Especially the platinum with concentric dial.

Those who said the proportions are off, bezel too big (it's a day date, not a daytona... d'oh) and so on and so on, all those critics. Chances are that they don't have it, never really got the chance to appreciate this masterpiece.

I hope and will be glad if indeed DD2 is discontinued. It will be that much more special as we won't have more supply coming. As for resale value, I don't really care - I have stocks, bonds, for investment. I bought the DD2 for enjoyment. I can't wait to see DD2 next to DD40, and then ask any average Joe who doesn't know a thing about DD lineup - who's the big brother?
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 03:12 PM   #27
slm9555
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 617
If I already owned a ddii I would not flip for the sake of not wanting to lose money. If I was buying for the first time and had the option to choose I would pick the 40
slm9555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 04:08 PM   #28
Keith1
"TRF" Member
 
Keith1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
No way would I flip. I think the 41mm is perfect, and would not go smaller.
Keith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 04:56 PM   #29
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Funny how this thread turned into a DD2 picture thread!

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2015, 05:11 PM   #30
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
...cause nobody here owns DD40 (yet)
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.