ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SLRdude · 31 January 2006, 02:49 PM

So... my car entry was disqualified because I used Text in my image. turns out text has its own contests.

New contest going on, same site. (worth1000.com)

Contest Regulations:

In this contest we're going to prove to the world that Samuel L. Jackson really is everywhere! Basically the idea is that you have free reign to do anything with any image (within site guidelines) so long as Mr. Jackson (any image) appears in the image in some form or another. A free-for-all with limitations. Yeah, that's the ticket! This is NOT a mating contest. You don't need to mate him with another person, simply use him in the image you create, i.e. Samuel L. Jackson as the Pope, Samuel L. Jackson as a singer, Samuel L. Jackson as a fast food worker, etc.

The rules of this game are thus: Use any image of Samuel L. Jackson somewhere in your pic. He can be edited, inserted, manipulated, cloned etc...the sky is the limit so long as any image of him is used somehow. As always, quality is a must. You'll have 48 hours for this contest, so make your submission count.

"And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to submit less than top quality."

This is what I came up with:

What do you guys think?
Don't forget... what this site is looking for "seamless".
They want entries that look real.

Launch Mini · 31 January 2006, 02:52 PM

Pretty good. I don't like to be critic ( especially when I can barely post a pic using Photobucket)...
BUT, his right foot looks like its floating. Edges to smooth??
Just that his shoes stand out so dark compared to the sandals.

SLRdude · 31 January 2006, 02:53 PM

good catch.

ralphieralph · 31 January 2006, 03:09 PM

Looks great Chip

but what about his clothes??They seem out of place for an old pic or does that even matter??

SLRdude · 31 January 2006, 03:13 PM

How about this one?

The clothes don't matter. The whole point of this is to make him be somewhere where he is not. the Ghandi photo is from 1931. Truth be told, the western male wardrobe hasn't changed much since so his clothes are ok.

SLRdude · 31 January 2006, 03:18 PM

Why can't they have a "create a watch" category??

A while ago I caught my orange PO smooching around with my Speedy pro.

Their baby is pppreeetttyyyy....

JJ Irani · 31 January 2006, 03:34 PM

Great looking watch....until Ed sees it!! LOL!!

BTW, why is Gandhi pointing to his groin?

C.J. · 31 January 2006, 04:12 PM

Looks good Chip

Gedanken · 1 February 2006, 07:09 AM

Hehehe - good one, Chip! Just noting that the lighting angles for Sam and the Mahatma are different - not that there's much you can do about that, of course, but maybe that's why the foot looks out of place.

31 January 2006, 02:49 PM	#1
SLRdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Chip Location: Dallas TX Posts: 6,194	Quick Question So... my car entry was disqualified because I used Text in my image. turns out text has its own contests. New contest going on, same site. (worth1000.com) Contest Regulations: In this contest we're going to prove to the world that Samuel L. Jackson really is everywhere! Basically the idea is that you have free reign to do anything with any image (within site guidelines) so long as Mr. Jackson (any image) appears in the image in some form or another. A free-for-all with limitations. Yeah, that's the ticket! This is NOT a mating contest. You don't need to mate him with another person, simply use him in the image you create, i.e. Samuel L. Jackson as the Pope, Samuel L. Jackson as a singer, Samuel L. Jackson as a fast food worker, etc. The rules of this game are thus: Use any image of Samuel L. Jackson somewhere in your pic. He can be edited, inserted, manipulated, cloned etc...the sky is the limit so long as any image of him is used somehow. As always, quality is a must. You'll have 48 hours for this contest, so make your submission count. "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to submit less than top quality." This is what I came up with: What do you guys think? Don't forget... what this site is looking for "seamless". They want entries that look real. __________________ Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87

31 January 2006, 02:52 PM	#2
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	Pretty good. I don't like to be critic ( especially when I can barely post a pic using Photobucket)... BUT, his right foot looks like its floating. Edges to smooth?? Just that his shoes stand out so dark compared to the sandals. __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

31 January 2006, 02:53 PM	#3
SLRdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Chip Location: Dallas TX Posts: 6,194	good catch. __________________ Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87

31 January 2006, 03:13 PM	#5
SLRdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Chip Location: Dallas TX Posts: 6,194	How about this one? The clothes don't matter. The whole point of this is to make him be somewhere where he is not. the Ghandi photo is from 1931. Truth be told, the western male wardrobe hasn't changed much since so his clothes are ok. __________________ Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87

31 January 2006, 03:18 PM	#6
SLRdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Chip Location: Dallas TX Posts: 6,194	Why can't they have a "create a watch" category?? A while ago I caught my orange PO smooching around with my Speedy pro. Their baby is pppreeetttyyyy.... __________________ Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87

31 January 2006, 03:09 PM	#4
ralphieralph "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Real Name: Ahh..."LEROY" Location: connecticut Watch: SUBMARINER Posts: 681	Looks great Chip but what about his clothes??They seem out of place for an old pic or does that even matter??

31 January 2006, 03:34 PM	#7
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Great looking watch....until Ed sees it!! LOL!! BTW, why is Gandhi pointing to his groin? __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

31 January 2006, 04:12 PM	#8
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	Looks good Chip

1 February 2006, 07:09 AM	#9
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	Hehehe - good one, Chip! Just noting that the lighting angles for Sam and the Mahatma are different - not that there's much you can do about that, of course, but maybe that's why the foot looks out of place. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)