ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 June 2015, 05:15 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: leeds
Posts: 52
|
Have things been a bit stale until recently ?
Just sharing my thoughts with you , I may be wrong ?
But until the D blue came out and the Blnr have Rolex sports watches just lacked that extra bit of something ? Hence why we're all going nuts over the D blue and the Blnr ? Not to mention the steel Daytona which to me looks well dated . I'd love to hear your thoughts guys |
20 June 2015, 05:16 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
welcome to the forum , dont mix dated with classic ,,,,
|
20 June 2015, 05:20 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
x2
Interesting first post from a member of 4 years.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
20 June 2015, 05:22 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted |
20 June 2015, 11:44 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
|
|
20 June 2015, 05:19 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Matt
Location: FL, USA
Watch: Sub 16610T
Posts: 715
|
First post and a member since 2011! Welcome to the fray! :P
__________________
16610 |
20 June 2015, 05:31 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
|
Welcome. I'd say no classic is cool not stale.
|
20 June 2015, 05:56 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: leeds
Posts: 52
|
1 post ? I've posted around the 200 mark ? Something's up please look into this ?
|
20 June 2015, 06:50 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
I don't want a Daytona but it is a classic, no doubt about that. Rolex evolutionary designs set the bar and it's pretty hard to find anything in their line which is dated or unexciting. They do what they've always done and it works
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
20 June 2015, 07:06 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
I think you are wrong
|
20 June 2015, 08:07 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
|
20 June 2015, 07:42 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
|
If you don't like classic and elegant, there's always pop and brash with other brands. Depending on my mood, I wear one or the other.
The slow design evolution is part of the very essence of Rolex except for a few exceptions. My 2014 116622 YM looks almost identical to the 1998 16622 and to me it's a great thing, because I fell in love with it back then, and I can enjoy it today with a few extras (parachrom, better stap middle links and clasp, chromalight, 50 hrs power reserve, 120 clicks bezel, nicer end links). At first sight they're the same watches, but there's quite a few upgrades under the bonnet, and they're worth it. I find the slow evolution to contribute to building a trusted and strong image, which I find reassuring especially at this price point. |
20 June 2015, 08:40 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Wesley
Location: Austin
Watch: 214270
Posts: 630
|
|
20 June 2015, 08:15 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Not stale, but I think the design of many models peaked during the 1970s and 1980s.
|
20 June 2015, 09:17 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
|
Quote:
Many industries have evolution rather than revolution, but as new age materials, and advanced IT come to play they are really starting to challenge what we think is possible. This is starting in earnest in building where modern CAD means buildings can take different forms, floors can be different heights and shapes, etc...... If you apply that to watches, whether you like them or not many of the new age brands like Erwerk, MB&F and even established brands such as GP with their constant Escapement models are pushing cutting edges. Watches certainly are in the middle of the firing line for accelerated evolution. Rolex are trapped for mine in a world of "brand equity/legacy/classic vs change call it what you will, but it also looks a lot like to me Profit maximisation and advertising over design. The fact they have almost no models with an exposed caseback, show they are high priced tool watches that are very robust and well made. On a variation to Adam's point Rolex real evolution was in the 50-90's with the Oyster case etc..... now we all get excited about the fact that the new Yachtmaster is going to come out on a rubber strap........ I am not bagging Rolex, and nor I am seeking to ban myself from TRF, but to me it is a brand that is well and truly in profit and marketing generation over technical innovation and is falling behind smaller brands that are capitalising on materials and technologies. lets face it we can all buy a $5 digital that tells the time, I think it would be nice to see them try and innovate to show what they could do. One day they may wake up and discover they are stale, what was classic is now just the past. Porsche may have much of its brand integrity in the classic air cooled 911, but they sell more 911's today thean ever because they have to keep innovating. It seems Rolex does not see the same need. Their response lets bring out a different DJ with a different dial.....
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze |
|
20 June 2015, 08:15 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
Don't think so. Looking back at the years prior to the release of the D-Blue and BLNR, there was the release of the following sport watches:
Submariner 114060 Yacht-Master II 116622 (blue dial) Explorer II 216570 Submariner Date 116610 LN I am sure I missed a couple more, but to me the above-mentioned watches garnered much excitement prior to their release. Also, the Daytona does not look dated, it is a classic and needs little or no updating. Much many other Rolex models, very little change is needed. A timeless classic.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 |
20 June 2015, 08:56 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
There are plenty of brands that "refresh" their watches every few years making previous models looks like dinosaurs. I like Rolex because they don't mess with their classics.
|
20 June 2015, 08:59 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
Milgauss blue?
|
20 June 2015, 11:36 AM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
DJII and even the now expired DDII were very different from the traditional Rolexes imho. Although I like the DD40 I think the DDII was so unique that it is a shame that it's gone.
|
20 June 2015, 11:40 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Stale? No...
Retaining a grip on the past while trying to incrementally push forward with the new? Maybe... |
20 June 2015, 11:59 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: hawaii
Posts: 175
|
I don't agree. There are a few classic models that still have appeal in the current market. There are also other new ceramic models that have great appeal. For me, the SD4000 is outstanding, and I admire it every time I look down at my wrist.
Rolex is slow to make changed to their lineup. To me, this adds to the appeal. If they came out with so many new models every year, it would water down the brand, and would become more so like "other" watch brands. Classics are classics for a reason... |
20 June 2015, 12:24 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 4,056
|
I have always viewed Rolex as similar to the Porsche brand. They have both changed little in terms of overall look, but they continue to make improvements in performance and durability. Additionally, both brands have fairly limited models; as stated before, they don't create new models every several months to be fashionable. They create timeless icons.
|
20 June 2015, 12:35 PM | #23 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Aside from design.....Compared to the late 1920s to late 1950s, when Rolex virtually invented and reinvented the modern wristwatch, then today the company is kind of treading water by comparison. But many would argue that it earned the right to do so, in those 30 years. The absence of Wilsdorf, Emile Borer, and a couple of others probably has something to do with it. A brand is only as good as its people.
|
20 June 2015, 12:48 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
... Likewise, a brand is only as good as its discipline (which is driven by exceptional leadership).
Clarity Consistency Coherence This is where Rolex excels. Most other brands get sloppy and loosey-goosey from time to time. |
20 June 2015, 04:42 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
|
"sloppy and loosey-goose "is a good way to describe Breitling IMO. Their SO line and Colt design has done a circle of terrible in the past five years it is finally back to something decent... Don't mean to be harsh, I own a couple myself.
|
20 June 2015, 02:30 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Rolex had "modern" designs in the past, but they didn't survive. They have found their market and evolved within their niche.
When was the last time you saw one of these on someone's wrist. |
20 June 2015, 08:50 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
The last time Mon posted a picture of his.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
20 June 2015, 03:51 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Probably already been said but among other points of significance, I'll add one word "Cerachrom"!!
|
20 June 2015, 05:21 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
There are very inventive and forward thinking manufacturers, but those selling the big numbers are not amongst them. Omega, Rolex and recently Tudor, are all "re-imagining" classic older designs, and doing well out of it. A mechanical watch is not a ground breaking item, for all the innovations the marketing departments come up with. It is a clockwork mechanism, admittedly honed to the state of the art.
The difference is, Rolex and to an extent are nailing it. The SD4000 is a near perfect modernising of the original (whichever original), and when the new Daytona turned up, it did the same back then so well that it still looks perfect now. I do not feel the same way about the Seamaster Master Coaxial 300. Great movement, but they missed. Although I like the Dark Side of The Moon. I have a soft spot for (non-Rado) ceramic. Tudor didn't when they did the Heritage Chrono. It looks better than the original. Stale? No. I even like the new Yachtmaster. |
20 June 2015, 07:05 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Tudor Ranger
Posts: 1,613
|
It allows you time to save up for the next one.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.