The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 June 2015, 05:15 AM   #1
gary3535
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: leeds
Posts: 52
Icon20 Have things been a bit stale until recently ?

Just sharing my thoughts with you , I may be wrong ?
But until the D blue came out and the Blnr have Rolex sports watches just lacked that extra bit of something ? Hence why we're all going nuts over the D blue and the Blnr ? Not to mention the steel Daytona which to me looks well dated .

I'd love to hear your thoughts guys
gary3535 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:16 AM   #2
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
welcome to the forum , dont mix dated with classic ,,,,
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:20 AM   #3
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysondiver View Post
welcome to the forum , dont mix dated with classic ,,,,
x2

Interesting first post from a member of 4 years.
__________________
----------------------
Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:22 AM   #4
rollee1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysondiver View Post
welcome to the forum , dont mix dated with classic ,,,,
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted
rollee1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 11:44 AM   #5
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysondiver View Post
welcome to the forum , dont mix dated with classic ,,,,
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:19 AM   #6
Naz737
"TRF" Member
 
Naz737's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Matt
Location: FL, USA
Watch: Sub 16610T
Posts: 715
First post and a member since 2011! Welcome to the fray! :P
__________________
16610
Naz737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:31 AM   #7
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
Welcome. I'd say no classic is cool not stale.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:56 AM   #8
gary3535
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: leeds
Posts: 52
1 post ? I've posted around the 200 mark ? Something's up please look into this ?
gary3535 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 06:50 AM   #9
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I don't want a Daytona but it is a classic, no doubt about that. Rolex evolutionary designs set the bar and it's pretty hard to find anything in their line which is dated or unexciting. They do what they've always done and it works
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 07:06 AM   #10
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
I think you are wrong
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:07 AM   #11
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
I think you are wrong
x2

Ginormous European wrist clocks and uber flashy styles of some other brands appeal to a different market segment. I'm good with timeless elegance...
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 07:42 AM   #12
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
If you don't like classic and elegant, there's always pop and brash with other brands. Depending on my mood, I wear one or the other.

The slow design evolution is part of the very essence of Rolex except for a few exceptions. My 2014 116622 YM looks almost identical to the 1998 16622 and to me it's a great thing, because I fell in love with it back then, and I can enjoy it today with a few extras (parachrom, better stap middle links and clasp, chromalight, 50 hrs power reserve, 120 clicks bezel, nicer end links). At first sight they're the same watches, but there's quite a few upgrades under the bonnet, and they're worth it. I find the slow evolution to contribute to building a trusted and strong image, which I find reassuring especially at this price point.
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:40 AM   #13
Dubarzy
"TRF" Member
 
Dubarzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Wesley
Location: Austin
Watch: 214270
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by VicLeChic View Post
I find the slow evolution to contribute to building a trusted and strong image, which I find reassuring especially at this price point.
Well said!
Dubarzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:15 AM   #14
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Not stale, but I think the design of many models peaked during the 1970s and 1980s.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 09:17 AM   #15
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Not stale, but I think the design of many models peaked during the 1970s and 1980s.
Like many threads I agree with Adam, I think this thread is perhaps more interesting and challenging for Rolex than most of us think.

Many industries have evolution rather than revolution, but as new age materials, and advanced IT come to play they are really starting to challenge what we think is possible. This is starting in earnest in building where modern CAD means buildings can take different forms, floors can be different heights and shapes, etc......

If you apply that to watches, whether you like them or not many of the new age brands like Erwerk, MB&F and even established brands such as GP with their constant Escapement models are pushing cutting edges. Watches certainly are in the middle of the firing line for accelerated evolution. Rolex are trapped for mine in a world of "brand equity/legacy/classic vs change call it what you will, but it also looks a lot like to me Profit maximisation and advertising over design.

The fact they have almost no models with an exposed caseback, show they are high priced tool watches that are very robust and well made.

On a variation to Adam's point Rolex real evolution was in the 50-90's with the Oyster case etc..... now we all get excited about the fact that the new Yachtmaster is going to come out on a rubber strap........

I am not bagging Rolex, and nor I am seeking to ban myself from TRF, but to me it is a brand that is well and truly in profit and marketing generation over technical innovation and is falling behind smaller brands that are capitalising on materials and technologies. lets face it we can all buy a $5 digital that tells the time, I think it would be nice to see them try and innovate to show what they could do. One day they may wake up and discover they are stale, what was classic is now just the past.

Porsche may have much of its brand integrity in the classic air cooled 911, but they sell more 911's today thean ever because they have to keep innovating. It seems Rolex does not see the same need. Their response lets bring out a different DJ with a different dial.....
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:15 AM   #16
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Don't think so. Looking back at the years prior to the release of the D-Blue and BLNR, there was the release of the following sport watches:

Submariner 114060
Yacht-Master II 116622 (blue dial)
Explorer II 216570
Submariner Date 116610 LN

I am sure I missed a couple more, but to me the above-mentioned watches garnered much excitement prior to their release. Also, the Daytona does not look dated, it is a classic and needs little or no updating. Much many other Rolex models, very little change is needed. A timeless classic.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:56 AM   #17
Seaswirl
"TRF" Member
 
Seaswirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
There are plenty of brands that "refresh" their watches every few years making previous models looks like dinosaurs. I like Rolex because they don't mess with their classics.
Seaswirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:59 AM   #18
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Milgauss blue?
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 11:36 AM   #19
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
DJII and even the now expired DDII were very different from the traditional Rolexes imho. Although I like the DD40 I think the DDII was so unique that it is a shame that it's gone.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 11:40 AM   #20
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Stale? No...

Retaining a grip on the past while trying to incrementally push forward with the new? Maybe...
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 11:59 AM   #21
jernigan78
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: hawaii
Posts: 175
I don't agree. There are a few classic models that still have appeal in the current market. There are also other new ceramic models that have great appeal. For me, the SD4000 is outstanding, and I admire it every time I look down at my wrist.

Rolex is slow to make changed to their lineup. To me, this adds to the appeal. If they came out with so many new models every year, it would water down the brand, and would become more so like "other" watch brands.

Classics are classics for a reason...
jernigan78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 12:24 PM   #22
Headshrinker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 4,056
I have always viewed Rolex as similar to the Porsche brand. They have both changed little in terms of overall look, but they continue to make improvements in performance and durability. Additionally, both brands have fairly limited models; as stated before, they don't create new models every several months to be fashionable. They create timeless icons.
Headshrinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 12:35 PM   #23
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Aside from design.....Compared to the late 1920s to late 1950s, when Rolex virtually invented and reinvented the modern wristwatch, then today the company is kind of treading water by comparison. But many would argue that it earned the right to do so, in those 30 years. The absence of Wilsdorf, Emile Borer, and a couple of others probably has something to do with it. A brand is only as good as its people.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 12:48 PM   #24
Tseg
"TRF" Member
 
Tseg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
A brand is only as good as its people.
... Likewise, a brand is only as good as its discipline (which is driven by exceptional leadership).

Clarity
Consistency
Coherence

This is where Rolex excels. Most other brands get sloppy and loosey-goosey from time to time.
Tseg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 04:42 PM   #25
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tseg View Post
... Likewise, a brand is only as good as its discipline (which is driven by exceptional leadership).

Clarity
Consistency
Coherence

This is where Rolex excels. Most other brands get sloppy and loosey-goosey from time to time.
"sloppy and loosey-goose "is a good way to describe Breitling IMO. Their SO line and Colt design has done a circle of terrible in the past five years it is finally back to something decent... Don't mean to be harsh, I own a couple myself.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 02:30 PM   #26
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Rolex had "modern" designs in the past, but they didn't survive. They have found their market and evolved within their niche.

When was the last time you saw one of these on someone's wrist.
Attached Images
 
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 08:50 PM   #27
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abdullah71601 View Post
Rolex had "modern" designs in the past, but they didn't survive. They have found their market and evolved within their niche.

When was the last time you saw one of these on someone's wrist.
The last time Mon posted a picture of his.
__________________
----------------------
Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 03:51 PM   #28
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Probably already been said but among other points of significance, I'll add one word "Cerachrom"!!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 05:21 PM   #29
jagwap
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
There are very inventive and forward thinking manufacturers, but those selling the big numbers are not amongst them. Omega, Rolex and recently Tudor, are all "re-imagining" classic older designs, and doing well out of it. A mechanical watch is not a ground breaking item, for all the innovations the marketing departments come up with. It is a clockwork mechanism, admittedly honed to the state of the art.

The difference is, Rolex and to an extent are nailing it. The SD4000 is a near perfect modernising of the original (whichever original), and when the new Daytona turned up, it did the same back then so well that it still looks perfect now.

I do not feel the same way about the Seamaster Master Coaxial 300. Great movement, but they missed. Although I like the Dark Side of The Moon. I have a soft spot for (non-Rado) ceramic.

Tudor didn't when they did the Heritage Chrono. It looks better than the original.

Stale? No. I even like the new Yachtmaster.
jagwap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2015, 07:05 PM   #30
omx5o
"TRF" Member
 
omx5o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Tudor Ranger
Posts: 1,613
It allows you time to save up for the next one.
omx5o is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.