The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 June 2015, 10:16 PM   #1
dere
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 2
16800 second hand length?

Hello!

I am little confused about Submariner 16800 second hand lengths. How many different lengths are there?

For example from this thread: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=377473


Lume spot of second hand is over the "square" index


Lume spot is not even near the square index.

Also the total length varies, some have second hand as long as a minute hand and some have little bit longer second hand (hand reach the minute markers).

Sorry for my bad english.
dere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2015, 05:10 AM   #2
Wing Zero
"TRF" Member
 
Wing Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: JC
Location: Earth
Watch: 1680 ~ 16610LV
Posts: 811
I think it's the angle of the picture that is causing the confusion.
__________________
************************

************************
Wing Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2015, 06:43 AM   #3
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
This is just not inherent to the Submariner 16800 but other models as well. I have owned many GMTs and Submariners and have observed this as well. You have two varieties, one where the tritium circle is closer to the center of the hand and the other variety where the tritium circle is closer to the outer end of the hand. The most common variety is the seconds hand where the tritium is closer to the center of the hand.

I have no answer as to why the tritium was placed in two different locations on the sweep second hand, but one theory was that it was placed further back from the end of the hand so it wouldn't obscure the date as the hand rotated around the dial. Personally, I believe that it was related to who manufactured the hands for Rolex.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2015, 04:37 PM   #4
R.W.T.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,004
Both hands are correct. 100%
R.W.T. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2015, 02:54 PM   #5
dere
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 2
Some "how to spot a replica Rolex"-guides tell that a short second hand is one mark of replica, apparently this is not right?
For example this guide slide 12.
http://www.slideshare.net/dindinwato...the-fake-signs

The guide also advises that "The illuminated circle on the second hand should hit the top of the 12 o'clock triangle exactly". So if the matte dial 16800 has a larger triangle than glossy it would be natural that the second hand is also shorter?
dere is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.