The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 July 2015, 04:24 PM   #1
havingagoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
havingagoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jason
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610 / 16570
Posts: 276
Trading 4 for 1?

Hello friends! I've been contemplating this prospective trade for several months now and it's coming down to the wire -- I need to do it or get off the pot!

Here's the dilemma, I've got a small but modest collection consisting of:

116520 Daytona (White)
216570 Explorer II (Black)
16570 Explorer II (White)

My daily, 1st Rolex, and my son's heirloom, the 16610 Sub, is staying with me.

I am looking to trade the top 3 listed for my drooling grail, a slightly used, 116719BLRO GMT. I'll be adding another $7700 or so on top of the 3 beauties mentioned above (which is basically 4 nice watches.) I have read about 2 for 1 deals and a couple of 3 for 1 deals, but 4 for 1?

I know this is totally subjective, but would you trade what is nearly 4 excellent Rolex pieces for 1 PM GMT? I do enjoy having a GMT when traveling, and I use my sub bezel for timing things several times daily (parking, laundry, etc..) The Explorer II falls short in this regard. The 16570 white dial is stunning, but I often miss having the ability to time items on the fly. Additionally, the Chronograph of the Daytona is a bit cumbersome to me with regards to unscrewing the pushers each time I need to time an action. The 116570 is too large for me at 42mm. It will not be missed.


It seems like I made up my mind, right? I guess I need to hear it from this wise and WIS community. Should I stay or I should I go? ♫♫♪♪♫♫♪
havingagoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:27 PM   #2
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,302
IMHO, it's way way way too much to give up for the return, but, you gotta do what you gotta do.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 06:57 PM   #3
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by cru jones View Post
imho, it's way way way too much to give up for the return, but, you gotta do what you gotta do.

x2
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:31 PM   #4
mzmonzon
"TRF" Member
 
mzmonzon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Marco
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 116719, PP 5726A
Posts: 201
I'd keep the Daytona and trade the sub. I'm just biased though coz I love the Daytona.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mzmonzon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:32 PM   #5
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
How old is the GMT and what are they asking for it?
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:33 PM   #6
luvsub
2024 Pledge Member
 
luvsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
Less is more. If you like wg gmt, then go for it. I will try to keep Daytona.
luvsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:42 PM   #7
havingagoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
havingagoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jason
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610 / 16570
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvsub View Post
Less is more. If you like wg gmt, then go for it. I will try to keep Daytona.
Less watches? Less valuable watches? I'm having a difficult time deciphering this

I agree, the SS Daytona is stunning. I truly love to look at it, and if I do part with it, I will certainly add it the collection again some day.
havingagoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:37 PM   #8
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:46 PM   #9
havingagoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
havingagoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jason
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610 / 16570
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
I've thought about this as a second option. I'd sell the 216570 and just add on top to get a 1675 or 16710. Great advice Adam!
havingagoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 05:51 PM   #10
Jonnyred72
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Jon
Location: West Sussex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by havingagoodtime View Post
i've thought about this as a second option. I'd sell the 216570 and just add on top to get a 1675 or 16710. Great advice adam!
+1
Jonnyred72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 06:42 PM   #11
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
This is the right answer
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 06:53 PM   #12
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
You sound sold on it. I say yes!
Since you'd still have the 16610, that would do it for me.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 06:48 PM   #13
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
Hmmm, the only problem with my Pepsi 16710 is the twinlock crown.

Just too small.

The triplock is the way.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 06:53 PM   #14
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
As I grow older, I find the idea of reducing my collection very appealing since maintenance costs would be prohibitive in my old age.

So something like the exercise you are considering has crossed my mind many times...
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 07:25 PM   #15
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
I would do the same thing. Depends on how badly you want the BLRO though.
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 09:49 PM   #16
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
This would be me as well
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 09:58 PM   #17
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
I agree with this, one could get a really nice 16710 pepsi for the 7k. If not I would save up a bit more and just get rid of the two Explorers. A Sub, Dayotona and BLRO would make a nice collection.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 04:27 PM   #18
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by old expat beast View Post
i would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the blro anyway, imo.
x2
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 10:27 PM   #19
gummy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
This is a great idea
gummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2015, 11:12 PM   #20
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
Would agree - sounds like a far better proposition and the 16710 Pepsi is a super watch!
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 10:54 AM   #21
Saoirse32
2024 Pledge Member
 
Saoirse32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I would just use the 7k to buy a nice 16710 pepsi in mint condition. It's a better looking watch than the BLRO anyway, IMO.
Spot on, my friend
__________________
PANERAI Luminor 8 Days GMT “Dot” Dial (PAM00233)
PANERAI Submersible (PAM01055)
PANERAI Radiomir (PAM01385)
ROLEX Sea-Dweller Mk1 (126600)
ROLEX DeepSea D-Blue (136660)
OMEGA Speedmaster “Silver Snoopy Award” (310.32.42.50.02.001)
OMEGA Seamaster Diver 300M 75th Anniversary (210.30.42.20.03.003)
IWC Chronograph Top Gun Edition “Woodland” (IW389106)
Saoirse32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 12:26 PM   #22
Copasetic
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Howie
Location: Florida
Watch: Varies
Posts: 578
I've been flipping watches (virtually all high end brands/ steel and PM's) since the late 70's. Should you trade three steel and some cash for one PM? From my experience, it comes down to "who you are".

Meaning, if you can make this trade and your new grail continues to be your grail after a few years, it was a smart move. Regardless of whether you paid a couple grand too much or got a great deal. Time will even that out. And your love for the piece will soon trump what you paid.

But, if you're like me, and every watch you get is a keeper forever going in, but after a few weeks, few months, or occasionally a few years it turns out it isn't, than it will be harder for you to come out. The more expensive the watch (like everything else in life), the fewer the buyers. So if your grail ceases to be your grail, it may be harder to sell and you may loose more when you go to sell it.

So, do you know yourself well enough to decide if you're a flipper or a keeper?

Just my two cents from my experience with this crazy passion.

Last edited by Copasetic; 22 July 2015 at 12:44 PM.. Reason: add additional thoughts
Copasetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2015, 01:36 PM   #23
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copasetic View Post
But, if you're like me, and every watch you get is a keeper forever going in, but after a few weeks, few months, or occasionally a few years it turns out it isn't, than it will be harder for you to come out. The more expensive the watch (like everything else in life), the fewer the buyers. So if your grail ceases to be your grail, it may be harder to sell and you may loose more when you go to sell it.

So, do you know yourself well enough to decide if you're a flipper or a keeper?

Just my two cents from my experience with this crazy passion.
Sound advice! Applies to everything in life (watches, cars, houses, spouses...)
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:42 PM   #24
Verdi
"TRF" Member
 
Verdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
No way Jose. But at the end of the day always do whatever makes you happy!
Verdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 04:47 PM   #25
Tank0040
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 85
Two explorers ain't gonna do anything much for you so they can go easily. As for the Daytona, if you fell out of love with it vs the 16610, then I guess you have your answer.

Many might make this trade for the WG sub, but not sure if they would do the same for the WG Pepsi considering that it's just the bezel that has the colours with a black dial. Might be a lot to give up for the bezel. But well, if it's the piece that makes you drool, then go for it!
Tank0040 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 05:04 PM   #26
havingagoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
havingagoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jason
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610 / 16570
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tank0040 View Post
Two explorers ain't gonna do anything much for you so they can go easily. As for the Daytona, if you fell out of love with it vs the 16610, then I guess you have your answer.

Many might make this trade for the WG sub, but not sure if they would do the same for the WG Pepsi considering that it's just the bezel that has the colours with a black dial. Might be a lot to give up for the bezel. But well, if it's the piece that makes you drool, then go for it!

You've made some valid points. My reasoning for the WG Pepsi is that it seems to check off all the boxes for me. GMT, rotating bezel, PM, and the weight and feel that accompanies. I think I need to enjoy a GMT II for a while before I revisit this decision.

Everyone has really helped me rationalize this decision, even if it wasn't what I was leaning towards
havingagoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 10:00 PM   #27
Tseg
"TRF" Member
 
Tseg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by havingagoodtime View Post
You've made some valid points. My reasoning for the WG Pepsi is that it seems to check off all the boxes for me. GMT, rotating bezel, PM, and the weight and feel that accompanies. I think I need to enjoy a GMT II for a while before I revisit this decision.

Everyone has really helped me rationalize this decision, even if it wasn't what I was leaning towards
One of the things holding me up from buying more watches is I always want to wear my favorite... which would be one I already own (BLNR) or the next one I get (??). In the world I live I'm not some fashionista needing just the right watch for the right occasion... I find most (sport) Rolex capable of being worn in nearly any setting, from The Beach to The Boardroom. I certainly would consider consolidating to a PM do-anything watch like the BLRO. Clearly my views of world order are different from many on this forum.

When I was very big into photography it always bothered me I had multiple cameras and many, many lenses. The more 'equipment' I accumulated the less value I extracted from each piece. I ended up selling off everything but my Sony RX1 full-frame 35mm (can't even zoom) and diverted to proceeds to my watch hobby. I'm much happier for it and have extracted much, much more value out of that 1 camera than the $3K I spent on it.

I think I would be happy with the watches you already have... and would also be happy with just a BLRO and Sub. If you consolidate to the BLRO than you have a bird-in-hand exquisite watch and you can always go back to accumulating back the 'lesser' pieces. But I think you will find once you have the BLRO you'll have much less interest in re-acquiring the SS pieces you let go. Ask Dr. Tom.
Tseg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 05:11 PM   #28
Verdi
"TRF" Member
 
Verdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
Trading 3 watches is generally bad business for you. It's better to sell the watches one by one and go and negociate with cash in your pocket.
Verdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 05:39 PM   #29
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
This hobby is anything but a logical decision. Go with your gut. If do the trade and have several times such that I don't have many steel watches anymore
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2015, 10:16 PM   #30
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
This hobby is anything but a logical decision. Go with your gut. If do the trade and have several times such that I don't have many steel watches anymore
Same here, once I tried PM, SS lost some of its allure. If you are keeping the Sub then I'd def go for the BLRO, best of both worlds.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.