|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
12 August 2015, 12:39 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Somewhere good
Watch: 116600
Posts: 64
|
Request: picture of your 15400 and Rolex 40mm side by side
Hi,
If you have AP 15400 and Rolex 40mm (subc, SD4K, etc...), can you please post side by side picture so that it shows the size difference? Thanks |
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 12:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 116515LN, 126621
Posts: 180
|
Not a Sub or a 15400, but this is 40mm vs 41mm
The AP dwarfs the Rolex in terms of pure size. |
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 01:03 PM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
Quote:
Technically, it's 38.6 bs 41. Not including the pushers of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 10:42 PM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Quote:
But the 15400 was thinner.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
|
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 01:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 116515LN, 126621
Posts: 180
|
Yea I have heard that before. Rolex lists it at 40mm so I used that.
Its worth noting that the AP is closer to the camera than the Daytona thus making it look twice as large. In reality the AP is much larger but not as large as the picture suggests. If the Daytona wears like a real 40mm, than the AP will wear like a large 42mm. Thats the best description I can give. |
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 02:03 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Somewhere good
Watch: 116600
Posts: 64
|
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 08:47 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
|
In my watch roll, FYI that 41 is one big sucker....... ultimately its why I moved on.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze |
|
|
|
|
12 August 2015, 09:52 PM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
I didn't think my 15400 wore very big at all, especially w the case being so thin. I actually thought it wore small for a 41mm.
That pic is VERY deceiving as mentioned above with the AP being closer to camera. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Best to stay silent and have the world think you're a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." SMD |
|
|
|
|
13 August 2015, 12:09 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
The AP just shines in comparison
|
|
|
|
|
13 August 2015, 02:04 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
Hm, no wonder 15300's sell so fast
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
