ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 01:42 AM

Does the Sea Dweller 4K (116600) feature the glide lock clasp same as a modern SubC? TIA

REFZ · 5 September 2015, 01:46 AM

Yes

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REFZ

Yes

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk

Thank you sir!

Pretty sure this is the next watch for me now that the wife owns my SubC.

SC11 · 5 September 2015, 01:49 AM

Yep same glidelock as the Submariners

However it doesn't have the half link link the Subs it has the divers extension.

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC11

However it doesn't have the half link link the Subs it has the divers extension.

Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference?

LumpHammer · 5 September 2015, 01:52 AM

The divers link is a unit that concertinas or zigzags out in three parts. It's engineering brilliance.

nyc2la · 5 September 2015, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LumpHammer

The divers link is a unit that concertinas or zigzags out in three parts. It's engineering brilliance.

Agree that it's great engineering!

OP, many owners of the SDc on TRF (and probably many who do not use the SDc for diving) remove the divers extension to "perfect" the fit. Not all do this, but many on TRF have said they do (I did, too.) Try it both ways to see which way works better for you. Great choice!

LumpHammer · 5 September 2015, 01:57 AM

here

Bhutton · 5 September 2015, 01:58 AM

It does - it's no DSSD clasp though - you still need to remove it to adjust it.

SC11 · 5 September 2015, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bhutton

It does - it's no DSSD clasp though - you still need to remove it to adjust it.

Granted it's not as functional as the DSSD version but I have no issues adjustment mine on the wrist (be it with the clasp open)

SC11 · 5 September 2015, 04:19 AM

Also echo the above the 116600 is my favourite SS Rolex

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC11

Also echo the above the 116600 is my favourite SS Rolex

Quite a statement given you own that beautiful white Daytona.

SD4K it is! Now to reach out to DavidSW...

SC11 · 5 September 2015, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuddaLun

Quite a statement given you own that beautiful white Daytona.

SD4K it is! Now to reach out to DavidSW...

The Daytona is a great watch but from a complete package point of view the 116600 ticks all the boxes.

Ritch99 · 5 September 2015, 04:30 AM

This is the only change the SD C needs IMO.
Name: image.jpg
Views: 349
Size: 98.5 KB

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ritch99

This is the only change the SD C needs IMO.
Attachment 657275

I presume this is the DSSD clasp?

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 02:47 AM

I just want to make sure I have this understood:

The SD4K has both the glidelock and the divers extension.

Whereas my SubC (13' model) has the glidelock (which I LOVE) and the half link.

Is that accurate? TIA

El Cascarrabias · 5 September 2015, 03:01 AM

That's right.

You're going to really like the SDc.

It will appear a bit smaller than the SubC. For me (but not for a lot of others) the larger lugs take away from the proportions of the SubC.

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias

That's right.

You're going to really like the SDc.

It will appear a bit smaller than the SubC. For me (but not for a lot of others) the larger lugs take away from the proportions of the SubC.

One of the reasons I'm glad the wifey took the SubC is the lug size issue you mentioned. I am looking forward to the smaller lugs, and the SD4K also has the raised crystal which I love.

Thanks for all the help fellas!

Glidelock · 5 September 2015, 04:00 AM

Your gonna love it Buddy!

Etschell · 5 September 2015, 04:02 AM

i think the sd4k is probably the best watch rolex makes in terms of design and functionality.

Gasoil4ever · 5 September 2015, 04:32 AM

Can anyone explain how to operate the divers extension ? I don't get it...

El Cascarrabias · 5 September 2015, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gasoil4ever

Can anyone explain how to operate the divers extension ? I don't get it...

Here's a nice little YouTube video to whet your appetite regarding the SDc: VIDEO

At 3:35 he displays the Glidelock and diver's extension. It'll give you an idea as to how they work. Not a great explanation but might help.

Gasoil4ever · 5 September 2015, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Cascarrabias

Here's a nice little YouTube video to whet your appetite regarding the SDc: VIDEO

At 3:35 he displays the Glidelock and diver's extension. It'll give you an idea as to how they work. Not a great explanation but might help.

Thanks, finally figured it out !

Ritch99 · 5 September 2015, 04:34 AM

Read da manual, best way to figure it out.

Gasoil4ever · 5 September 2015, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ritch99

Read da manual, best way to figure it out.

My manual is 6500kms away from me...

fixinbones · 5 September 2015, 05:57 AM

Good info here. I always thought the SD4K has the same clasp as the DSSD. I love the clasp on my DSSD. So easy to adjust for wrist expansion in hot weather.

LumpHammer · 5 September 2015, 04:56 AM

Seems odd the Deep Sea clasp isn't on the whole range of divers. It's brilliant. If it exsists why not?

BuddaLun · 5 September 2015, 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LumpHammer

Seems odd the Deep Sea clasp isn't on the whole range of divers. It's brilliant. If it exsists why not?

Justifying the cost premium and carving out the distinguishing features/capabilities of the DSSD as compared to SD and Sub.

And because they can.

LumpHammer · 5 September 2015, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuddaLun

Justifying the cost premium and carving out the distinguishing features/capabilities of the DSSD as compared to SD and Sub.

And because they can.

Eh? Cost premium? Distinguishing capabilities?
The R&D is already done as is the tooling. Why not just make more?

KBM · 5 September 2015, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LumpHammer

Eh? Cost premium? Distinguishing capabilities?
The R&D is already done as is the tooling. Why not just make more?

I think the glidelock (at least) should be available for ALL rolex professional models, period. It's too good to be restricted to the divers.

5 September 2015, 01:42 AM	#1
BuddaLun "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: USA Watch: LV & BLRO Posts: 210	SD4K --> Glidelock equipped? Does the Sea Dweller 4K (116600) feature the glide lock clasp same as a modern SubC? TIA

5 September 2015, 01:46 AM	#2
REFZ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Martin Location: Netherlands Watch: The Rolex Way Posts: 1,471	Yes Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G920F met Tapatalk __________________ 114060 - 116520 - 126334

5 September 2015, 01:57 AM	#8
LumpHammer Banned Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Lee Location: London Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 264	here Attached Images

5 September 2015, 04:30 AM	#14
Ritch99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Mitch Location: CONUS Watch: DSSD and others Posts: 1,186	All the SDC 4000 Needs is This This is the only change the SD C needs IMO.

5 September 2015, 04:32 AM	#21
Gasoil4ever "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Cameroun Watch: GS Snowflake Posts: 1,534	Can anyone explain how to operate the divers extension ? I don't get it... __________________ 16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original.

5 September 2015, 01:49 AM	#4
SC11 Banned Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Sam Location: UK Watch: AP ☠️ Posts: 6,151	Yep same glidelock as the Submariners However it doesn't have the half link link the Subs it has the divers extension.

5 September 2015, 01:52 AM	#6
LumpHammer Banned Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Lee Location: London Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 264	The divers link is a unit that concertinas or zigzags out in three parts. It's engineering brilliance.

5 September 2015, 01:58 AM	#9
Bhutton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Toronto Posts: 197	It does - it's no DSSD clasp though - you still need to remove it to adjust it.

5 September 2015, 04:19 AM	#11
SC11 Banned Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Sam Location: UK Watch: AP ☠️ Posts: 6,151	Also echo the above the 116600 is my favourite SS Rolex

5 September 2015, 02:47 AM	#16
BuddaLun "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: USA Watch: LV & BLRO Posts: 210	I just want to make sure I have this understood: The SD4K has both the glidelock and the divers extension. Whereas my SubC (13' model) has the glidelock (which I LOVE) and the half link. Is that accurate? TIA

5 September 2015, 03:01 AM	#17
El Cascarrabias "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Frank Location: USA Watch: 16613LB Posts: 1,006	That's right. You're going to really like the SDc. It will appear a bit smaller than the SubC. For me (but not for a lot of others) the larger lugs take away from the proportions of the SubC.

5 September 2015, 04:00 AM	#19
Glidelock "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Will Zdorf Location: So. Cal. Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC Posts: 1,947	Your gonna love it Buddy!

5 September 2015, 04:02 AM	#20
Etschell "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: FL Watch: platinum sub Posts: 15,884	i think the sd4k is probably the best watch rolex makes in terms of design and functionality.

5 September 2015, 04:34 AM	#24
Ritch99 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Mitch Location: CONUS Watch: DSSD and others Posts: 1,186	Read da manual, best way to figure it out.

5 September 2015, 05:57 AM	#26
fixinbones "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: New York Watch: 118206 Posts: 911	Good info here. I always thought the SD4K has the same clasp as the DSSD. I love the clasp on my DSSD. So easy to adjust for wrist expansion in hot weather. __________________ 126719 BLRO meteorite 126660 D-blue 118206 Day Date

5 September 2015, 04:56 AM	#27
LumpHammer Banned Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Lee Location: London Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 264	Seems odd the Deep Sea clasp isn't on the whole range of divers. It's brilliant. If it exsists why not?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)