The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 November 2015, 07:21 AM   #1
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Watch getting slower after 20 days

Hi all,

I started measuring my Pelagos Blue and the first five days it was running ~ -0.1s/day, the next 5 days -0.3s/day, next 5 -0,6s/day and the last 5 days -0,8s/day...

I guess -0,8s/day is really good, however was kind of getting used with the -0,1-0,3 measurements :)

Is it normal the watch gets slower and slower when wearing longer or (sort of running in time?) should I expect it to get even worse or will it stabilize?

Average since I owned the watch is -0,5s/day

Thanks!
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:31 AM   #2
JSI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 116610
Posts: 108
Is that -0.8 seconds per day, not -8 seconds per day. If its -0.8 seconds per day be happy. That is pretty awesome.
JSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:48 AM   #3
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSI View Post
Is that -0.8 seconds per day, not -8 seconds per day. If its -0.8 seconds per day be happy. That is pretty awesome.
I guess so, not too worried about the -0,8s/day (now) but more that the watch loses 8x as much per day in the last 5 days vs. the first 5 days...

If that continues it will be at 6 hours / day in a 3 months :)
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:34 AM   #4
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
So how are you measuring the fractional seconds?
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:46 AM   #5
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR View Post
So how are you measuring the fractional seconds?
Using an App.. but: losing 0,5s in the first 5 days is -0,1s/day and losing 1,5sec in 5 days = 0,3s/day
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:36 AM   #6
themaninblack
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,058
They get tired after a while!
themaninblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:46 AM   #7
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
I take it you have a Timegrapher if you're measuring that precisely? Is it similar in all positions?

Based on several anecdotes here it's not unusual for new watches to adjust a bit after some "break-in" and keeping time within one second is excellent by any standard.

Sent from my 0PM92 using Tapatalk
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:53 AM   #8
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerfunk View Post
I take it you have a Timegrapher if you're measuring that precisely? Is it similar in all positions?

Based on several anecdotes here it's not unusual for new watches to adjust a bit after some "break-in" and keeping time within one second is excellent by any standard.

Sent from my 0PM92 using Tapatalk
Not using timegrapher but NTP synched app... measurements pretty steady day-by-day and these are the averages over 5 days (lost total ~0.5 the first 5 days, lost ~1.1 the next 5 days, ~2.0 the next 5 days and ~3.8 the last 5 days.)

So I guess it is the break-in... I hope it stops "breaking in" soon :)
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:59 AM   #9
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerfunk View Post
Is it similar in all positions?
Wearing and sleeping with it 24/7 I guess stuff also depends on what position i sleep in..
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:51 AM   #10
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
I've yet to use a measuring app that can actually measure watches that accurately, regardless of what kinds of numbers they spit out.
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:53 AM   #11
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
I've yet to use a measuring app that can actually measure watches that accurately, regardless of what kinds of numbers they spit out.
X2 If he's using an app, its margin of error is likely larger than the reported difference in timekeeping altogether.

Sent from my 0PM92 using Tapatalk
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:56 AM   #12
evdwal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Almere
Watch: Pelagos Blue
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
I've yet to use a measuring app that can actually measure watches that accurately, regardless of what kinds of numbers they spit out.
Fair enough, It did loose 9 seconds since I set it compared to time.gov in the last 22 days. I wasn't stressing about .2 more or less on a single measurement (that is user inaccuracy anyways) but over 5 days or 20 days it should average out.

I will stop obsessing, and be happy with the sub 1 second...
evdwal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 07:57 AM   #13
nibbl3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Nashville
Posts: 60
funny, i thought my new SubC was losing time. I started checking it regularly, almost neurotically some may say. It seemed to be keeping with my iphone just fine. I picked up my ipad and discovered that IT was in fact losing time, not the watch

Best of luck fixing your problem though!
nibbl3s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 08:03 AM   #14
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
+/-7 seconds is about right. You can always get it check at a RSC.

I would be happy with what you got once it loses more time then i would take it in
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.