ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
18 March 2016, 11:44 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
Black Bay vs Black Bay 36
I think many of them are confused the reason Black Bay 36 is even named Black Bay and should have been named something else(including me). Do you think its the same dial, hands, markers and possibly case from the older 41mm to new 36 version? 36 does have a flatter crystal compared to domed one on 41mm and a smaller crown(should have been more smaller). So, basically the same watch minus the bezel? Hence the association with the name of Black Bay? Your thoughts?
|
18 March 2016, 11:51 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
|
I like the watch, but agree it should be called something else. Without the bezel, what does it really have to do with their diver models of the past that the Black Bay is modeled after?
Marketing probably wanted to tie in to the success of the Black Bay in launching a new model. |
18 March 2016, 11:52 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Simon
Location: Essex
Posts: 530
|
It's not a BB in my eyes. It's quite a nice looking watching in its own right, but it is not a BB. You'd think the people at Tudor would have thought of something better.
|
18 March 2016, 11:52 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
|
To me, calling the 36mm a Black Bay would be like calling the Explorer a smaller Submariner
|
19 March 2016, 12:28 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
IMO, this is what the Heritage Ranger should have looked like, but I guess the name was already taken... We can call it Shirley for all I care, it is still a wonderful watch in its own right. I would certainly buy one ! |
|
19 March 2016, 12:46 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Carlos
Location: Eivissa
Watch: Rolex, Tudor....
Posts: 1,635
|
I love the size! 36mm is my favorite but makes me feel strange... Is like looking the BBB without insert...rare!
|
19 March 2016, 12:50 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
Actually I like that. Without the insert makes the dial appear bigger. Guess will have to see a live one first (just hope it's not as thick as BB41).
A few good points: - BB36 is a good catchy name so we don't need to come up with some silly nickname - seems like Tudor kept the same bracelet (not the riveted one) - smaller crown (proportionate to the case) |
19 March 2016, 03:13 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: n/a
Location: SE, Michigan.
Watch: Tudor BB Blue
Posts: 62
|
Waiting for a live one.
Quote:
|
|
19 March 2016, 03:23 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
|
19 March 2016, 03:24 AM | #10 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
Quote:
Thank God! |
|
19 March 2016, 01:01 AM | #11 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
Quote:
It's a field watch in the style of the Black Bay, from which it takes it's name. It's size will appeal to those who are tired of huge watches, but are still attracted to a highly visible dial with a nod to Tudor's past.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
19 March 2016, 01:19 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk |
|
19 March 2016, 01:28 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,726
|
I like it
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women." |
19 March 2016, 01:26 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
Quote:
More pertinent question in my post was - if its the same dial, hands as of 41? which no one seems to answer or give thoughts about. |
|
19 March 2016, 01:32 AM | #15 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
Quote:
Sorry. Sent from my SM-G900V
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
19 March 2016, 01:44 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 629
|
|
19 March 2016, 01:16 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
Is the bezel in the BB36 domed (like oyster perpetual) or straight (like explorer)?
|
19 March 2016, 01:29 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
|
19 March 2016, 03:42 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
|
19 March 2016, 06:32 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
|
|
19 March 2016, 01:30 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Strange to name it that yes, but it is a really simple and beautiful watch. Too small for my preference but I love it.
|
19 March 2016, 03:39 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Erich
Location: -5
Posts: 742
|
reminds me of the old tudor prince oyster (no date) except for the snowflake hands
- love it but I like the larger Heritage Ranger even more as I have gotten used to the bigger watches (but 43mm may just be too much...) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.