ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 May 2016, 08:33 AM | #1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: GA
Watch: Sub/Explorer
Posts: 499
|
14060m clasp problems
As commonly known the clasps on these tend to be cheap feeling. I happen to love mine and this watch, but often the clasp hangs down about a half inch and gets Caught on things and it is so frustrating. If it gets caught hard enough it will completely undo the divers extension and the watch can fall off my wrist in the matter of a second.
This issue makes me want to dump it and get the 114060 but I just don't want to let this watch go for a multitude of reasons. I like other bands and straps but wear it on the oyster 99% of the time. I've taken a link out and set the clasp on the tightest setting which helps but the watch is then slightly too tight on my wrist which gets uncomfortable. Thoughts / suggestions? |
16 May 2016, 08:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
|
Keep an eye out on the preowned market for a used glidelock clasp. Solves all your problems and comes up from time to time. It's what I use on my 16610lv with no issues.
|
16 May 2016, 08:45 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
Agree with you the clasp could be better... Just so happens the clasp of a 93250 (sub date) bracelet is better (also a 93160 from a SD)
They easily swap out with your original 93150 clasp and remove the issue with zero visual departure from stock.
__________________
|
16 May 2016, 08:48 AM | #4 | ||
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: GA
Watch: Sub/Explorer
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
Quote:
Both awesome suggestions. Any idea how much one of either would run used? I thought about the glidelock but totally forgot the clasp on the date model for whatever reason snaps the extension into place, really wish they did it that way on the OEM bracelet for the no date. |
||
16 May 2016, 08:46 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
I sourced mine on eBay.
Because of the improved design the 93250 clasp does not accidentally pop open.
__________________
|
16 May 2016, 08:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
I've seen $400-500 for the clasp in good condition, they are not so plentiful.
The glidelock would depart from stock look and feel a bit too much for me and will cost significantly more.
__________________
|
16 May 2016, 09:19 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Something is wrong, I've worn 93150's for 15 years and never had one pop open
|
16 May 2016, 09:34 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
No matter how much I like a watch, I never spend money to fix this kind of problem. Must be perfect for me all original otherwise I flip. IMHO you will be very happy with the 114060.
|
16 May 2016, 09:37 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,080
|
I have to admit, I'm much the same. Great advice from Gus though if you opt to go that route
|
16 May 2016, 09:53 AM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: GA
Watch: Sub/Explorer
Posts: 499
|
I agree too and this one is pretty much perfect for me but this one issue. I like the ceramic version but I'm not sold on the widened lugs (had a date version and wasn't huge on it) or the engraved rehaut. It's frustrating because it's just the extension piece that isn't performing to standard everything else is perfect
|
16 May 2016, 09:57 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
16 May 2016, 10:02 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,598
|
Quote:
Swapping the clasp is not as great as if Rolex sorted it at the factory and if you ever bring the watch for service to RSC, they will probably put you in front of a firing squad. That said, once you replace it with the 93250 clasp you won't think about it again. Btw, 1 important caveat the alternative clasps (both 93250 & 93160) have a half link in place of the full link of the 93150 (the permanent link attached to the clasp) so your fit may improve or worsen depending on your specific needs.
__________________
|
|
16 May 2016, 10:41 PM | #13 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
16 May 2016, 11:20 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 361
|
I took a washcloth and wrapped it around the clasp and squeezed the outer edges a little with a pair of pliers and have not had an issue in over a year. The clasp sits nice and snug without any flopping.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.