ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 May 2016, 01:45 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: North Carolina
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 421
|
Vintage Submariner Help
I'm trying to learn my vintage subs and I could use some help.
Which are the most desirable references and dial variations? Is older always better? Is a Mark I more desirable than a Mark II and 2 more than 3 (etc)? Thanks in advance for the education! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
29 May 2016, 02:05 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
|
Welcome to the world of Vintage!!
This will give you a good introduction to Red subs and their relative rarity. And generally speaking Mark I's are more rare than II's and III's as you will see in the pie charts. http://www.watchprosite.com/?page=wf...211&pi=4075146 Oh and just to warn you....once you learn of the history of these watches and the little differences, you will become obsessed with them. It's the part I like best, learning all the little stuff. Enjoy!!
__________________
- "M" 16600 Sea-Dweller - "A" GMT 16700. -“A” 16613LB Sub - 1680 Red Sub, Mark II, "Full Set" - 116660 DSSD D-Blue, 124060, 126613LN, 116710BLNR - 116500LN White Dial - “U” 16610 “SWISS” dial |
29 May 2016, 04:06 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Vintage Submariner Help
Check out the sticky for Beaumontmiller post. In general, condition n originality r paramount in vintage. Currently of the white variety, the maxis r hot.
I blame it on the autoconnect. |
29 May 2016, 10:40 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: North Carolina
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 421
|
Thanks I read the watchprosite article very informative.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.