ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

timein · 5 July 2016, 11:09 AM

Which one is most likely to become a classic, the GMT ll Batman or the Deep Sea Blue?

Dusko.Popov · 5 July 2016, 11:15 AM

Too little information to provide a quality answer. Both are still in production. The dsb is arguably made in lesser numbers. But the blnr is arguably more popular. When are they going to stop production of either? That's the most critical variable with respect to future value in my estimation.

ELITEVIDEOGAMES · 5 July 2016, 11:16 AM

They are all great. It's highly unlikely one will appreciate more than the other however as they are modern pieces.

Spartacus · 5 July 2016, 11:18 AM

Neither. Go vintage now if you want appreciation. Both the DSSD-blue and BLNR are mass produced and will not be hard to come by in the next 5-10 years.

joli160 · 5 July 2016, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartacus

Neither. Go vintage now if you want appreciation. Both the DSSD-blue and BLNR are mass produced and will not be hard to come by in the next 5-10 years.

Yep

brandrea · 5 July 2016, 11:42 AM

Longer term I'd venture to guess the DBlue as it is produced and made in lower quantity.

B.B.B. · 5 July 2016, 11:55 AM

The Kermit is on it's way up

The Libertine · 5 July 2016, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B.B.B.

The Kermit is on it's way up

16710 is too.

bdex75 · 5 July 2016, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B.B.B.

The Kermit is on it's way up

As are Tudor Subs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

evlkoala · 5 July 2016, 01:38 PM

DSB, but we will find out in 40 years.

joe100 · 5 July 2016, 02:41 PM

The Kermit and batman won't be remembered, however the 16610LV and BLNR will be

daytonaTBR · 5 July 2016, 03:19 PM

If you're looking at this as an investment, you're better off elsewhere. Don't count on appreciation for a very long time, if at all. That said, long term the Deep Sea Blue will probably do better than the blnr

BigAl72 · 5 July 2016, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aw15

if you're looking at this as an investment, you're better off elsewhere. Don't count on appreciation for a very long time, if at all. That said, long term the deep sea blue will probably do better than the blnr

x2

ref1655 · 5 July 2016, 06:20 PM

rather than trying to 'guestimate' a future classic/collectible Rolex, why not simply buy one & set it aside....and wait for periodic retail price revisions to push its initial cost upwards? then you can sell it at a profit (albeit it slightly over) what you originally paid for it?

as far as striving to make a big time 'killing' on one...dream on. those days for all intents & purposes, never really existed unless you happened to buy a Rolex when they cost under $1000.00.

ajas · 6 July 2016, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigAl72

x2

X3

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Tony64 · 5 July 2016, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aw15

If you're looking at this as an investment, you're better off elsewhere. Don't count on appreciation for a very long time, if at all. That said, long term the Deep Sea Blue will probably do better than the blnr

This.

Gerardus · 5 July 2016, 03:25 PM

Personally I think that heavy and big watches (>40mm) will not go up in price compared with for example the kermit or the pepsi.

77T · 5 July 2016, 03:34 PM

If this is a real-world buying choice, my way would be to start with a BNIB DSSD Blue now and put it in the safe with all the stickers just as it came from AD. Then plan to buy the GMT BLNR BNIB the year they discontinue it and put it in the safe just the same as the DSSD.
Then let history sort out the question 50 years from now.
If you don't have 50 years to wait, like me, then wear them and enjoy!!!

TickTopia · 5 July 2016, 07:31 PM

I'd say the D-Blue, based upon the additional constraints in which Rolex, has placed upon it's production.

travisb · 5 July 2016, 07:46 PM

Both will eventually become "classic" as they are both extremely popular amongst modern references. As to which one over the other? Time will tell. As of now, the D Blue is harder to come by but the BLNR has a bigger fan following.

AK797 · 5 July 2016, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Both will eventually become "classic" as they are both extremely popular amongst modern references. As to which one over the other? Time will tell. As of now, the D Blue is harder to come by but the BLNR has a bigger fan following.

Agree with Travis, both are very popular given their production numbers, and will be in demand for years to come. As for money, as others have said look elsewhere.

HL65 · 5 July 2016, 08:57 PM

Get the D Blue...It is a tight allocation watch still and hard for even big AD's to get. I know bigger ones only getting a few per year and smaller ones lucky to see one over a few years. So it is still tight and my guess will stay that way. I will say it along with BLNR are 2 of my favorite modern Rolex and make for 2 great additions to any collection.

fskywalker · 5 July 2016, 09:32 PM

D Blue

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

beshannon · 5 July 2016, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timein

Which one is most likely to become a classic, the GMT ll Batman or the Deep Sea Blue?

Over what time period?

kirksingleton · 6 July 2016, 09:20 AM

I would bet on the DSSD hands down, just because it is more of a specialty piece. There is a ton of gmts out there on the street.

Lordofrolex · 6 July 2016, 09:40 AM

DSSD if you had to make an educated bet will be worth more in the future once it discontinues.

Speed · 6 July 2016, 10:31 AM

Define "Classic"

5 July 2016, 11:09 AM	#1
timein "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: south carolina Posts: 14	Future appreciation Which one is most likely to become a classic, the GMT ll Batman or the Deep Sea Blue?

5 July 2016, 02:41 PM	#11
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	The Kermit and batman won't be remembered, however the 16610LV and BLNR will be __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

5 July 2016, 03:25 PM	#17
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,147	Personally I think that heavy and big watches (>40mm) will not go up in price compared with for example the kermit or the pepsi. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

5 July 2016, 03:34 PM	#18
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 42,024	If this is a real-world buying choice, my way would be to start with a BNIB DSSD Blue now and put it in the safe with all the stickers just as it came from AD. Then plan to buy the GMT BLNR BNIB the year they discontinue it and put it in the safe just the same as the DSSD. Then let history sort out the question 50 years from now. If you don't have 50 years to wait, like me, then wear them and enjoy!!! __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

5 July 2016, 08:57 PM	#22
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 64,009	Get the D Blue...It is a tight allocation watch still and hard for even big AD's to get. I know bigger ones only getting a few per year and smaller ones lucky to see one over a few years. So it is still tight and my guess will stay that way. I will say it along with BLNR are 2 of my favorite modern Rolex and make for 2 great additions to any collection. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

5 July 2016, 11:15 AM	#2
Dusko.Popov "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: DC Posts: 829	Too little information to provide a quality answer. Both are still in production. The dsb is arguably made in lesser numbers. But the blnr is arguably more popular. When are they going to stop production of either? That's the most critical variable with respect to future value in my estimation.

5 July 2016, 11:16 AM	#3
ELITEVIDEOGAMES "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Tom Location: Long Island NY Watch: me sell games Posts: 1,898	They are all great. It's highly unlikely one will appreciate more than the other however as they are modern pieces.

5 July 2016, 11:18 AM	#4
Spartacus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DC Watch: Daytona Posts: 2,745	Neither. Go vintage now if you want appreciation. Both the DSSD-blue and BLNR are mass produced and will not be hard to come by in the next 5-10 years.

5 July 2016, 11:42 AM	#6
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,132	Longer term I'd venture to guess the DBlue as it is produced and made in lower quantity.

5 July 2016, 11:55 AM	#7
B.B.B. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Emmanuel Location: California, USA Watch: submariner lv m Posts: 764	The Kermit is on it's way up

5 July 2016, 01:38 PM	#10
evlkoala "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Sub Posts: 862	DSB, but we will find out in 40 years.

5 July 2016, 03:19 PM	#12
daytonaTBR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: N/A Posts: 1,466	If you're looking at this as an investment, you're better off elsewhere. Don't count on appreciation for a very long time, if at all. That said, long term the Deep Sea Blue will probably do better than the blnr

5 July 2016, 06:20 PM	#14
ref1655 Banned Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: SF Bay Area Watch: 1655/MkI Posts: 1,100	rather than trying to 'guestimate' a future classic/collectible Rolex, why not simply buy one & set it aside....and wait for periodic retail price revisions to push its initial cost upwards? then you can sell it at a profit (albeit it slightly over) what you originally paid for it? as far as striving to make a big time 'killing' on one...dream on. those days for all intents & purposes, never really existed unless you happened to buy a Rolex when they cost under $1000.00.

5 July 2016, 07:31 PM	#19
TickTopia 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: Wild West, USA Posts: 1,418	I'd say the D-Blue, based upon the additional constraints in which Rolex, has placed upon it's production.

5 July 2016, 07:46 PM	#20
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Both will eventually become "classic" as they are both extremely popular amongst modern references. As to which one over the other? Time will tell. As of now, the D Blue is harder to come by but the BLNR has a bigger fan following.

5 July 2016, 09:32 PM	#23
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,183	D Blue Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

6 July 2016, 09:20 AM	#25
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	I would bet on the DSSD hands down, just because it is more of a specialty piece. There is a ton of gmts out there on the street.

6 July 2016, 09:40 AM	#26
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	DSSD if you had to make an educated bet will be worth more in the future once it discontinues. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

6 July 2016, 10:31 AM	#27
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	Define "Classic"

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)